Connect with us


State of Michigan Busybodies Claim Hillsdale’s Graduation Ceremony “Broke the Law”



Despite complying with Michigan’s Wuhan virus order at its graduation ceremony last weekend, Hillsdale College was accused of breaking the law when it decided to host celebrations in person.

Greg Piper of the College Fix reported that Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Attorney General Dana Nessel delegated enforcement responsibilities to local police.

According to The Detroit News, Hillsdale “required everyone to wear a mask,” took guests’ temperatures and had them seated six feet apart, and instructed them not to walk around at “some events” during the three-day event.

Trending: North Carolina Police Officer Viciously Beaten as Onlookers Laugh, Film for 11 Minutes

Graduate Arena Lewis, was caught by surprise by the event’s strict guidelines:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I hardly ever see kids without masks on. I think everyone’s being very compliant and obeying out of Christian charity and love for everyone else.

Whitmer declared that she was “gravely concerned” that Hillsdale was holding this event, while Nessel’s office asserted that the college was in violation of local restrictions on “organized” gatherings of more than 100 people, according to a report from the News. Nessel’s spokesperson stated that the college demonstrated a “lack of consideration” with the celebration, and that “we trust the local law enforcement agencies to exercise their authority and discretion in their enforcement efforts.”

Hillsdale County Sheriff Tim Parker did not bother to enforce this order then and beforehand. Parker informed the News his office has never enforced Whitmer’s Wuhan virus orders and would not give people at the graduation ceremonies citations.

The college released at least four press releases highlighting Wuhan virus precautions that should be taken during graduation and the legality of the in-person ceremonies under the governor’s orders and the federal and state constitutions.

The first release on July 16 said that the university had talked with “health officials, epidemiologists, city officials, state government, and law enforcement officials,” including Whitmer’s office beginning on June 12, over a month before the rescheduled commencement.

In addition, the county’s prosecuting attorney informed the university that its commencement activities were “protected by the U.S. Constitution and Michigan Constitution,” and that Whitmer’s order outlines a specific exemption for “constitutionally protected conduct” such as attending commencement, Hillsdale stated.

Another release from that same day broke down the First Amendment justification for holding the commencement and the many health and safety precautions Hillsdale was taking:

Hillsdale College’s Commencement is an ‘expressive activity’ protected by the First Amendment. It is a ceremony rich with symbolism and meaning. Since 1856, the College has exercised those rights by holding annual commencement exercises–including during the Civil War, World War I, the 1918 Pandemic, the Great Depression, and World War II. Despite the trauma of those times, which have been particularly severe on this campus, Hillsdale College has stood by the ceremony as the culminating meaning of the work of the College and as indispensable to its mission.

On July 17, it said four “renowned epidemiologists” had talked with the college about its commencement plans, including Stanford University’s Jay Bhattacharya, whose early research indicated that the Wuhan virus was far less lethal than originally prognosticated and who has criticized testing practices for their tendency to overestimate the death counts.

“If the private benefits of the event are important enough relative to the public health risks and care is taken by event organizers to minimize those risks by adhering to the extent possible to safe practice guidelines promulgated by public health authorities, then the event should receive approval by public health experts,” Bhattacharya stated.

“The Hillsdale plan adheres to [CDC and WHO] guidelines to a much greater extent than other similar gatherings,” he added.

Hillsdale took a shot at Whitmer by pointing to the governor’s participation in a June 4 Black Lives Matter march where she obviously broke from any social distancing practices by kneeling close to other participants:

The governor took part in one herself (which did not comply with CDC guidelines), and afterwards, her spokesperson said that was an appropriate thing for the governor to do because it had been an expressive First Amendment event. We agree.

The News said Whitmer’s march had very “little social distancing,” as witnessed in the photos that show Whitmer staying close together with other participants.

However, her spokesperson asserted that the governor was not in violation of her own order due to the fact that she “took precautions for engaging in an outdoor activity, including wearing a mask even though it is not required outdoors under the order.”

It is amusing to see how right-wing groups get placed under the microscope for violating Wuhan virus related guidelines, while the Left can get away with doing whatever it wants.

Right wingers will need to forge alliances with local law enforcement and bureaucratic bodies to ensure that their activities don’t get shutdown.

Campaign 2020

Thanks to Spineless, Establishment Republicans, Senate Panel Delays Vote to Subpoena Big Tech CEOs

Republicans Continue to Show Pathetic They are on the Issues that Matter Most



America First nationalist’s hopes of having Big Tech CEOs testify before Congress about allegations of censorship directed towards the Right were temporarily dashed on October 19, 2020.

Politico reported that the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed plans to vote on subpoenas to force the CEOs of Twitter and Facebook to go before the Senate and be questioned about their anti-Right wing censorship policies.

Some Republicans ended up having cold feet and decided to postpone the vote much to the disappointment of right wing activists who have complained about Big Tech’s anti-free speech policies.

President Donald Trump and a number of nationalist Republicans have sharply criticized Facebook and Twitter over their censorship of a controversial New York Post report that exposed Hunter Biden, Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son, and his corrupt behavior.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Originally, GOP officials in the Judiciary Committee announced plans to hold a markup on October 20 to determine if they would subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to get his perspective on allegations concerning his company’s policies that muzzle conservative viewpoints. Twitter denies claims regarding Twitter’s censorship policies.

South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who is the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, revealed that the planned vote would also call on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify.

The panel stated on October 19 that it would determine whether they would issue subpoenas during a executive session on October 22 where it will also allegedly approve Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. The committee declared in a statement that it will maintain negotiations with the companies “to allow for voluntary testimony” by the CEO. However, if an agreement cannot be reached, the panel will proceed to take a vote on the subpoenas “at a date to be determined.”

The subpoenas would compel the tech big wigs to testify on the reports of “suppression and/or censorship” of New York Post stories and on “any other content moderation policies, practices, or actions that may interfere with or influence elections for federal office,” according to a committee document released on October 19.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz, who is the chair of the Judiciary’s Subcommittee on the Constitution said to reporters that he’s expecting the committee to preside over testimonies from the Twitter and Facebook chiefs “shortly” regardless of whether they come to the decision on their own volition.

“One way or another, either voluntarily or pursuant to subpoena, they will testify and they will testify before the election,” Cruz stated.

In a separate hearing for the Senate Commerce Committee, Zuckerberg and Dorsey will join Google CEO Sundar Pichai on October 28 for a hearing on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which generally shields Big Tech companies from a liability.

Cruz, who is a member of both Judiciary and Commerce committees, wants each panel to carry out their own hearings with the tech chiefs before election day. “I believe we need a separate hearing in Judiciary because the issues being discussed in the two committees are different,” Cruz remarked.

Big Tech has become too powerful, especially during a time when social media has become the de facto public square. Republicans will need to get serious about making online speech receive the same treatment as general political speech.


Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!