Connect with us

Deep State

STONE INTERVIEW: Release My Transcript To Public To Prove My Innocence!; Democrats Broke Law

Published

on

Longtime President Trump political adviser Roger Stone is demanding that the full transcript of his interview with the House Intelligence Committee be released to the public to prove once and for all that Stone did not collude with the Russians during the 2016 presidential election.

The Intelligence Committee — chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes until the new Congress convenes Thursday — voted to release the transcript of Stone’s behind-closed-doors interview to Robert Mueller’s office, but the transcript has still not been provided to the public, and the clock is ticking for the outgoing Republican majority to publicize the document. (READ: How Deep State ‘Journalist’ Michael Isikoff Has Been Setting Up Mueller’s Enemies For Years).

“Nunes has not released the transcript. I am not allowed to inspect it. They are not allowed to take notes. It’s four and a half hours long and is maintained in a secure room in the US House of Representatives,” Stone told Big League Politics in an interview.

Trending: Grassroots Leaders Send Final Warning to GOP Establishment: Rejecting Trump Means Death of Republican Party

“Mueller’s request for a copy is the result of a one year campaign of distortion and disinformation by Adam Schiff and the Schiff-heads. Portions of my testimony have been linked to by Natasha Bertrand of the Atlantic which is a direct violation of law,” Stone said.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“My testimony is entirely accurate and truthful and to the extent that I made errors in memory they are all memories to my benefit — meaning, I failed to recall information that was entirely exculpatory,” Stone said. Stone asserts that Randy Credico was his source on the story that Julian Assange planned to leak Democrat emails, not Assange himself. Stone has released his text messages with Credico.

Stone actually turned down a set-up attempt in 2016 against him during the heat of Operation Crossfire Hurricane.

“By way of example, as you know, back in June I sent this Committee a letter regarding a longtime FBI informant named Gennadiy Vasilievich Vostretsov who, under the alias “Henry Greenberg”, was sent to approach my client in May 2016 with claims of having access to information that could impact the election,” writes Stone’s attorney Grant Smith in a letter to Nunes. “Mr. Stone not only immediately and forcefully declined to participate in anything this FBI informant was proposing, but never saw or spoke to the informant again. Mr. Stone believes it highly likely that Mr. Vostretsov/Greenberg’s status as an FBI informant was not “former”, and that Vostretsov/Greenberg was, in fact, actively working on behalf of the FBI at the time of their meeting, acting upon a calculated effort to entrap Mr. Stone and, further, to infiltrate and compromise the Trump effort. Notably, Vostretsov was admitted to the country nine separate times on an FBI Informant’s visa.”

Stone wanted to testify publicly, but the Intelligence Committee would not let him do so. It is highly unlikely that Mueller will publish any information that vindicates Stone, due to the special counsel’s determined crusade to keep the “Russia” collusion narrative going without any evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians.

Stone recently passed a lie-detector test regarding the Russia-themed allegations against him.

Here is Stone’s interview with Big League Politics in which he walks through the entire case and asserts that he never communicated with Julian Assange, who also has never been found to have colluded with the Russians when leaking Democrat emails during the 2016 campaign.

 

 

Deep State

Source: Feds are Purging National Guard Members Based on Ties to NRA, TPUSA, Patriotic Groups

It’s unclear if there’s any due process.

Published

on

According to an alleged White House source, the feds are purging National Guard members based on their association with conservative patriotic groups such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) or Turning Point USA (TPUSA).

The extreme paranoia within the deep state has been taken to a new level following the U.S. Capitol siege on Jan. 6. The feds have succumbed to conspiracy theories that there are disloyal ranks within the military who must be purged and cannot be trusted to protect President-imposed Joe Biden.

Journalist Jack Posobiec of the One America News Network made the announcement in a tweet:

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The FBI has released a baseless report, countering intelligence from the Pentagon, that QAnon supporters are planning to “infiltrate” the National Guard during inauguration. This irresponsible propaganda from the FBI has fueled the police state in Washington D.C.:

 

The Capitol has been turned into an occupied military zone as the America transitions back to establishment rule:

Big League Politics has reported on the fake news that Trump supporters were planning armed demonstrations in Washington D.C. and elsewhere during Biden’s inauguration:

Mainstream media figures have claimed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is warning of imminent “armed protests” at every state capitol in the country on January 20th, the day on which Joe Biden is slated to be inaugurated as President…

In a development seeming to contradict with claims of imminent armed marches on state capitols, the special agent in charge of the FBI Boston office revealed that the agency had no reason to believe a threat of criminal activity was at hand in the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island.

We are currently not in receipt of any credible information regarding violent activity in or around the capitol buildings, or anywhere else for that matter, connected to the events of Jan. 6 or the upcoming inauguration,” said Special Agent in Charge Joseph R. Bonavolonta.

Armed protests occasionally happen- almost always peacefully- in states with pro-Second Amendment gun laws. But it’s all but impossible to imagine states such as New Jersey, Massachusetts and New York legally allowing armed protests, with open carry being all but outright illegal.

Some protests supposedly planned at state capitols are being organized by individuals affiliated with “Boogaloo” subculture, a juvenile anarchist movement that largely opposes President Trump, let alone supports election protests. Thin sourcing for the legitimacy of these events seems to rely on little more than amateuristic online fliers, as opposed to real organization and permit processing usually required for protest events at sensitive areas such as state capitols.

The feds are looking to inflame tensions even further to justify their unconstitutional crackdown after Biden seizes power. America is hanging by a thread, and the globalists are pulling out all the stops to destroy the nation for good.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending