A sweeping study of Britons found that every demographic – from age, to ethnicity, to political party – wants less immigration.
“Findings by the new Tory think tank Onward revealed majority backing for controlling numbers even among 18-24 year-olds – who back it by 38 to 36 per cent,” according to The Sun. “An even higher proportion of Remainers back cutting immigration – with 40 per cent in support and 34 per cent against – the same numbers among Asian voters.”
“Remainers” are those who voted for Britain to stay a member of the European Union. They are considered liberal, and would be expected to support immigration.
The study sampled 10,000 Britons.
“The findings come as Britain faced its highest rate of non-EU migration for 14 years,” Breitbart said. “In 2018, net immigration from non-EU countries stood at over 248,000, equivalent to the population of Southampton arriving in just one year. The demographic shift helped push the non-UK born population of the country to 9.4 million, around one in seven people nationwide.”
The United States, too, is having a fierce debate about the merits of immigration – both legal and illegal. President Donald J. Trump has proposed building a wall on the Southern border to discourage illegal immigration, but has been stymied by both political parties.
As illegal border crossings surge, Democrats blocked a meaningful amount of wall funding in the 2019 federal budget. President Donald J. Trump declared a National Emergency to address the issue, with plans to diver Department of Defense funding for the project, for which several heavily-blue states immediately sued his administration.
In addition to failing to deliver wall funding during 2017 and 2018, 12 Republican Senators voted against the president’s emergency wall funding, including Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Mike Lee (R-Utah), and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.).
Follow Peter D’Abrosca on Twitter: @pdabrosca
Like Peter D’Abrosca on Facebook: facebook.com/peterdabrosca
Preorder Peter D’Abrosca’s Book: “Enemies: The Press vs. The American People”
W.H.O. Creates Bailout Fund for Vaccine Consortium Distributing Novel COVID-19 Shots in Poor Nations
Globalists are throwing money at the humanitarian crisis they created.
This is the first ever vaccine injury compensation program that has been offered on an international scale, as the WHO attempts to paper over the havoc caused by Big Pharma’s warp speed shots.
“By providing a no-fault lump-sum compensation in full and final settlement of any claims, the COVAX programme aims to significantly reduce the need for recourse to the law courts, a potentially lengthy and costly process,” the WHO said in a press release, contending that the hush money will be doled out to victims in “a fast, fair, robust and transparent process.”
The leaders of the COVAX program, which is a partnership set up by the WHO and the Gavi vaccine alliance, are happy that their inefficient disastrous program will be given a bailout to facilitate even more atrocities throughout the third world.
“It helps those in countries who might have such effects, manufacturers to roll out vaccines to countries faster, and is a key benefit for lower-income governments procuring vaccines through (COVAX),” said Seth Berkley, who works as the chief executive for Gavi.
While individuals in these poor countries are at least receiving compensation after being violated by these shots, residents of first-world nations are not so lucky.
Big League Politics has reported on how Big Pharma is exempted from liability in the U.S. when their COVID-19 vaccines cause damages:
The US government has granted Pfizer and Moderna immunity from liability in case people develop severe side effects from their COVID-19 vaccines.
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act allows the Department of Health and Human Services to provide liability immunity for “certain medical countermeasures,” such as vaccines, except in cases of “willful misconduct.”
According to CNBC, someone who develops severe side effects from a COVID-19 vaccine can neither sue the FDA for authorizing the vaccine, nor one’s employer for mandating it.
And although it is theoretically possible to receive money from the government to cover lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses following “irreparable harm” from a vaccine, only 29 claims—6 percent of all claims—have received compensation over the past decade.
In short, don’t count on compensation for a COVID-19 vaccine gone wrong. And don’t count on seeing any of those “you may be entitled to financial compensation” commercials for it either.
The United Nations is already scapegoating first-world nations that are objecting to this insane and backward vaccine regime. The globalist technocracy is taking shape, and the horrors are outpacing the terrifying vision outlined by George Orwell in 1984.
Congress2 days ago
An America First Patriot is Challenging Dan Crenshaw in Next Year’s GOP Primary. Here’s Why.
Two Americas3 days ago
Black Teen Travels to White Suburb to Commit Mass Shooting, Mainstream Media Remains Silent
White House1 day ago
NOT MENTALLY FIT: Three Dozen House Democrats Demand Biden Relinquish Control of Nuclear Codes
Tech1 day ago
BETRAYED: How Parler Sold Out to the Globalist Establishment to Get Back Online
Opinion3 days ago
Opinion: CPAC’s Incompetency and Hypocrisy on Full Display in Their Handling of the Young Pharaoh Situation
Big League Economics2 days ago
Globalists are Planning ‘Climate Lockdowns’ to Finish Off Economic Prosperity in the West
Big League Economics4 days ago
Gas Prices Have Exploded Since Biden Entered Office
Congress3 days ago
RINO ALERT? David Perdue Sat on Millions in Campaign Cash as Democrats Took Georgia Senate Seats