Connect with us

News

Supreme Court Issues a Ruling with Mixed Results for Pro-Life Activists

Published

on

Clarence Thomas Takes Advantage of this Case to Drop Major Truth Bombs about Abortion’s Racist Origins

LifeSiteNews.com reports that a U.S. Supreme ruling on Tuesday will not hold a ban on abortions that are based on child’s race, sex, or disability.

This ruling dealt with pro-life law signed in 2016, which had provisions that required the humane disposal of fetal remains and banned racist, sex-based abortions. The ruling kept the former provision intact, while the Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s decision to strike down the latter provision.

Before becoming President Donald Trump’s running mate, then Indiana Governor Mike Pence signed House Enrolled Act 1337 which banned abortions that were pursued on the grounds of a preborn child’s race, sex, ethnicity, or potential disabilities. Further, it required abortionists to bury or cremate fetal remains instead of treating them like medical waste.

Trending: Tennessee’s Marsha Blackburn Calls on Ilhan Omar to Resign After Minnesota Democrat Calls to “Dismantle” U.S. “System of Oppression”

Pro-abortion interests sued, using the argument of  the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Ken Falk that every woman has an “absolute right as part of her privacy interests” to abort a child she deems undesirable. A district judged agreed with Planned Parenthood, and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals would later uphold these injunctions.

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Last October, Indiana’s Republican Attorney General Curt Hill requested that the Supreme Court hear HEA 1337, contending that “right to abortion declared by our Supreme Court protects only the decision not to bear a child at all, not a right to decide which child to bear,” and remind the high court that “our nation knows only too well the bitter fruits of such discrimination.”

On Tuesday morning, the Court issued an unsigned order which reversed the Seventh Circuit’s decision that scrapped the fetal burial provision. However, the Court rejected the state’s request to reverse the previous lower court’s judgement on the portion of law which banned discriminatory abortions.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas took advantage of this decision to drop some inconvenient truths about abortion’s racist history.

The justice argued, “This law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.”

Thomas expanded on abortion’s ties to eugenics:

The use of abortion to achieve eugenic goals is not merely hypothetical. The foundations for legalizing abortion in America were laid during the early 20th-century birth control movement.

The birth control movement largely grew along with the American eugenics movement.

Thomas also exposed some unsavory truths about Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, “who recognized the eugenic potential of her cause.” The Supreme Court justice detailed some of Sanger’s views on race, which have generally been kept away from the public eye, and how these views shaped the history of the abortion movement.

Thomas concluded:

This case highlights the fact that abortion is an act rife with the potential for eugenic manipulation. Although the Court declines to wade into these issues today, we cannot avoid them forever. Having created the constitutional right to an abortion, this Court is dutybound to address its scope.

News

A Week After Getting Kicked Off YouTube, Stefan Molyneux Gets Booted from Twitter

Published

on

On July 7, 2020, right wing social media philosopher Stefan Molyneux received a suspension from Twitter, a week following his ban from YouTube. This move comes at a time when many people are questioning Big Tech’s influence on political discussion on the Internet

The ban was implemented without even so much as a warning, according to a report by RT. Molyneux explained the situation during a livestream. “It’s nice to see that Twitter is talking to tech journalists before they would talk to me,” he commented. The right-wing pundit asserted that he was suspended from the platform following the promotion of a new essay that details his values and beliefs. “It’s not hard to understand why powerful people might not want you to read what I wrote below,” Molyneux wrote in a note detailing his suspension from Twitter.

Molyneux is of the opinion that the campaign to deplatform conservative influences has begun to “energize” conservatives. He believes that his ban shows “who has the power and who doesn’t have the power.”

Twitter disputed the idea that he was kicked off for ideological reasons. Twitter provided a statement to CNN in which it contended that Molyneux “was suspended for spam and platform manipulation, specifically operating fake accounts.”

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

But others condemned Twitter’s decision and warned of a growing assault on free speech, expecting “the purge” to “accelerate.”

Fellow commentators such as Mike Cernovich were critical of this decision. He took it a step further by predicting that the group of renowned public figures who recently signed on to an open letter calling out cancel culture would not bother to defend Molyneux.

Cernovich tweeted,”The Venn diagram of people who just signed that Against Cancel Culture letter and those who will mention Stefan Molyneux being banned will be two wholly non-intersecting circles.”

Molyneux is the host of Freedomain Radio and was permanently unpersoned from YouTube on June 29 after supposedly being in violation of the site’s “hate speech” policies.

Molyneux’s removal comes at a time when Big Tech is putting the clamps on all forms of right-wing dissent.

BLP previously reported on Big Tech attacking pro-gun groups as part of their plan to muzzle any form of right-wing expression.

As the 2020 elections approach, this kind of censorship will likely increase against figures who actually stir the pot.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending