The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the international body tasked with ruling over the 47 member states of the Council of Europe, made a ruling this week that effectively criminalizes telling the truth about the Islamic faith by essentially affirming a ruling made by the Austrian courts against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff after she derided the prophet Muhammad’s for having a six-year-old child bride.
It was decided that Sabaditsch-Wolff’s comments “were likely to disturb the religious peace”so her freedom of speech had to be curtailed, to satisfy the desires of the third-world invaders prone to violence. These are the predictable end results of Europe’s embrace of diversity and acceptance of multiculturalism.
Sabaditsch-Wolff was censured by the Austrian government for speaking at an event in Vienna organized by the Austrian Freedom Party ten years ago. She wanted to speak out for human rights on behalf of the women who are being oppressed in Islamic dictatorships throughout the world, but to the Austrian government and ECHR, this is considered hate speech worthy of condemnation.
“A 56-year-old and a six-year-old? What do we call it, if it is not pedophilia?” she asked while giving her presentation to a small audience of about 30 people. According to the Koran, Mohammad was engaged to Aisha when she was six and waited until she was nine to consummate the marriage.
A fake news peddler at the event snitched to law enforcement, and Sabaditsch-Wolff was charged with “disparagement” as a result. After being initially found guilty in 2011, she was ordered to pay a 480-euro fine or be locked up for up to 60 days in jail. She decided to fight the unjust ruling with assistance from the European Center for Law and Justice (ECLJ).
“This was not about defending a right to the expression of blasphemous obscenities, but to preserve the faculty of telling the truth and denouncing the errors, even if that displeases,” the ECLJ stated in a press release about the case.
After waiting for many years, the European High Court did not even refer the appeal to the Grand Chamber for consideration. Her appeal was simply ignored and tossed aside by the unelected, unaccountable globalist bureaucrats. The ECLJ claims this sets a new precedent of forcing European states to ensure “the peaceful co‑existence of all religions and those not belonging to a religious group by ensuring mutual tolerance.”
“I see it as a shift towards multiculturalism, willing to sacrifice freedom of expression to the demands of the ‘living together’. Such a judgment renounces the ideal of truth-based justice and prefers to it the arbitrary one of tolerance’,” the ECLJ wrote in their summation of the decision made by the European Court, which they claim is persisting on a “liberticidal path.”
“In doing so, it is the judge who decides what can be said according to his own conception of the ‘living together’, and to his fear of the reactions of those who might feel offended by these remarks,” the ECLJ added.
The European High Court actually had the audacity to defend Mohammad’s wedding to the nine-year-old girl, making the twisted justification that, because he stayed with his child bride until after she was 18, his acts of pedophilia were somehow less wrong.
“The court concluded that the applicant had intended to wrongfully accuse Muhammad of having pedophilic tendencies. Even though criticizing child marriages was justifiable, she had accused a subject of religious worship of having a primary sexual interest in children’s bodies, which she had deduced from his marriage with a child, disregarding the notion that the marriage had continued until the Prophet’s death, when Aisha had already turned 18 and had therefore passed the age of puberty,” the ECHR stated.
The globalists will apparently even justify pedophilia in their blind push to create a multicultural Europe. Freedom of speech is not the only core principle under assault by these international interests and the third-world barbarians who they enable with their genocidal ideology.
Hostilities Explode As Armenia, Azerbaijan Fight Over Disputed Nagorno-Karabakh Region
Dozens have been killed.
Intense combat broke out between the military forces of Armenia and Azerbaijan over the weekend, with the two west Asian countries intensifying a conflict over the disputed territory known of Nagorno-Karabakh.
Reports indicate that more than thirty fighters between the two sides were killed over the weekend.
Nagorno-Karabakh’s (also known as Artsakh) pro-Armenian local government claimed that the Armenians had destroyed 20 UAV’s, 3 helicopters, and thirty tanks or fighting vehicles of the Azerbaijani armed forces.
— Artsakh Security Council Office (@secco_artsakh) September 27, 2020
The Armenian ministry of defense has confirmed that more than 200 of its personnel fighting in the conflict have been wounded. It’s possible casualties could explode over the week if Azerbaijan continues its attempt to conquer towns and villages administered by the Artsakh government.
An Azerbaijan Army T-72 tank getting destroyed by Armenian Army
2 Helicopters, 3 UAV, 3 Tanks were destroyed by 🇦🇲pic.twitter.com/YbAxM47upE
— SPADEX (@SpadeX95) September 27, 2020
The small territory is inhabited by a majority Armenian population, who wholly support the region’s integration into Armenia. Ethnic warfare over the area first erupted in 1988 as the two nations separated from the collapsing Soviet Union, and has flared up intermittently since then.
The region is largely internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and Azeri attempts to assert sovereignty over the mountainous region have been met with fierce resistance from the local population before. The fighting exploded over the weekend when Azerbaijan attempted to move its military personnel into the area, and it appears that the latest round of fighting has been the most vicious so far.
The warfare escalated when Armenia accused Azerbaijan of deploying artillery and airstrikes against pro-Armenian fighters in the region, with Azerbaijan claiming it only used the weapons in response to Armenian attacks of the same variety.
Armenia is Christian, and Azerbaijan is Muslim. The former has conditional backing from the Russian Federation, while Azerbaijan is staunchly supported by neighboring Turkey. Many Armenians are staunch in their defense of the region as an Armenian territory, citing the legacy of the Ottoman Empire’s genocide of the Armenian population of Anatolia following World War I.
— Armenia 🇦🇲 (@armenia) September 27, 2020
Big League Wellness4 days ago
CDC Admits There is No Proof COVID-19 is Airborne Virus and They Have Been Misleading the Public All Along
Deplorables4 days ago
Sarah Palin Considering Primary Challenge to RINO Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski
Culture4 days ago
Left-Wing Scholar Pushes to Censor Social Media Accounts Opposing Child Sex Trafficking by Tying Them to QAnon Movement
Videos4 days ago
VIDEO: Slow Joe Calls U.S. Troops ‘Stupid Bastards’ After They Refused to Clap for His Remarks
Campaign 20203 days ago
WATCH: Joe Biden Reads Teleprompter Incorrectly: “I Got to the Senate 180 Years Ago”
Black Lives Matter4 days ago
‘Their Goal is Terror’: Sen. Rand Paul Tells the Truth about Black Lives Matter Agenda
Tech3 days ago
Facebook Directly Censoring Tucker Carlson in Advance of November Election
Black Lives Matter3 days ago
Man Who Shot Two Louisville Police Officers ONLY Charged With Assault, Wanton Endangerment