Connect with us

News

Texans are Being Denied their Second Amendment Rights if They Acquire Medical Marijuana

Published

on

The Dallas Morning News reported about the case of Joshua Raines and his battle with epilepsy and PTSD.

Five years of service in the military made Raines develop these conditions.  For years, Raines used marijuana illegally to treat these ailments.

Raines, has been eligible for a legal prescription of medical marijuana since 2015, the year when Texas lawmakers enacted the Compassionate Use Program for patients with uncontrolled epilepsy.

Trending: Trucking Industry Leaders Expect Biden’s Policies to Crush Small Trucking Companies

However, the veteran and Purple Heat recipient has resisted seeking a prescription, because doing so would have him forfeit his right to buy a firearm.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Raines said, “Why am I going to give up one of my rights because I found an organic plant that some are uncomfortable with?”

The veteran added, “I’m not going to do that. I’m not going to trade my rights like baseball cards.”

Across the country, states have gradually embraced legalizing medical marijuana despite being classified as a Schedule 1 controlled substance. Federal law enforcement has generally let these state actions slide.

For guns, it’s a different story. Under federal law, it’s illegal to buy guns if you use marijuana.

Many Texan gun owners who have conditions that make them eligible to acquire medical marijuana are now thinking twice about getting medical marijuana prescriptions due to the threat of having their gun rights stripped.

Rachel Malone, the Texas director for Gun Owners of America, said “To tell Texans you can’t purchase a firearm if you have a compassionate use card is unconscionable. We should not force people to choose between gun ownership and taking care of themselves.”

Firearms application forms explicitly ask buyers if they’ve ever used “marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance.” It also makes clear that marijuana is still illegal under federal law.

The application has a warning section:

Warning: The use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under Federal law regardless of whether it has been legalized or decriminalized for medicinal or recreational purposes in the state where you reside.

Earlier this year, the state legislature expanded the Compassionate Use Act, thus making marijuana more accessible to Texans. The law Governor Greg Abbott signed Friday, which allows specialty doctors to give out cannabis prescriptions that contain 0.5 percent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for certain conditions such as epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, ALS, terminal cancer, autism, incurable neurodegenerative disease and spasticity.

Raines said that he would illegally use marijuana if he had to, because of how effective it has been in treating his seizures.

He finished off by saying that “I fought for the right to bear arms. It’s literally in our Constitution for me to be able to own a gun. For the state of Texas that is the most pro-gun, I think it’s ridiculous I would have to trade one of my rights.”

This demonstrates how connected the drug reform and gun issues are. Gun activists will have to form coalitions with drug reformers and vice versa if they want to expand their supporter base and create long-lasting policies that enhance liberty.

Big League Guns

White Pill: Montana House Moves Constitutional Carry Bill Forward

Constitutional Carry is one ray of hope for the Right.

Published

on

On January 20, 2021, the Montana House of Representatives passed Constitutional Carry legislation, HB102.

Dean Weingarten of Ammoland.com reported that the bill passed by a 66 to 31 margin.

Weingarten provided some context to the significance of this bill’s progress:

The bill is the accumulation of a decade and a half of struggle against Democrat Governors, who have repeatedly vetoed reform legislation passed with large majorities in the legislature. Numerous sections in the bill show the Montana legislature has learned the lesson from other states as they restore the right to keep and bear arms.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Montana’s Senate is made up of 31 Republicans and 19 Democrats and Governor Greg Gianforte is a Republican, so the passage of this bill augurs well.  If passed, HB102 would make Montana the 17th Constitutional Carry state.

Montana is already a very gun-friendly state, and represents a low-hanging fruit for Second Amendment activists to tap into.

Constitutional Carry has been one of the most successful movements on the Right over the past twenty years. It’s easy to complain about the corrupt status quo, but there are still plenty of ways right-wingers can score victories. Constitutional Carry is one of them.

It would behoove the Right to analyze existing trends and build off movements that are already producing results. There’s no need to embark on quixotic campaigns that end up being total fools’ errands. Find what’s already working and run with it.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending