News
The British Government is Surrendering to the Wuhan Flu
On March 12, 2020, the British government announced that it will be pursuing a strategy of “herd immunity” to fight off the Wuhan flu.
According to ITV, herd immunity is “what happens to a group of people or animals when they develop sufficient antibodies to be resistant to a disease.”
Raheem Kassam, the Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes that the British government’s herd immunity strategy would “let everyone get infected.”
The UK government response to #coronavirus is "herd immunity", or in other words, let everyone get infected.@realDonaldTrump might wanna rescind that travel exemption…https://t.co/9PjZK6TGMc
— Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) March 12, 2020
He even suggested that President Donald Trump “might wanna rescind that travel exemption.”
Kassam was referring to the Trump administration’s decision to suspend all travel between the U.S. and continental Europe, with the exception of the UK and Ireland.
The British government thinks that it can allow the Wuhan flu to sweep across the entire population so that it can obtain herd immunity, albeit at a slower rate so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms can actually receive the urgent medical care they need. In doing so, the country’s health infrastructure would not be overwhelmed and depleted by the total volume of cases it has to attend to at any given moment.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has effectively capitulated on the issue by stating at a press conference that “I must level with the British public… many more families are going to lose loved ones before their time.”
⚠️ UK PM Boris Johnson appears to capitulate to #coronavirus.
Says in press conference tonight: "I must level with the British public… many more families are going to lose loved ones before their time". https://t.co/vqjQ61OND7 pic.twitter.com/ooJycqcED8
— Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) March 12, 2020
From here on out, it appears that the UK government is pursuing a strategy of herd immunity to fend off the Wuhan flu, which goes to show that prost-Brexit is off to a rocky start.
Big League Guns
Merrick Garland Suggests that Getting Rid of Lawsuit Protections is Not a Second Amendment Violation
Garland as AG will be a disaster for the right to bear arms.
If Merrick Garland is nominated as Attorney General, the Second Amendment is in big trouble.
Based on his comments at a Senate hearing on February 22, 2021, Garland made a suggestion that the repeal of lawsuit protections for gun manufacturers is not unconstitutional.
AWR Hawkins of Breitbart News reminded his readers that President Joe Biden campaigned on a platform of repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shielded lawful gun manufacturers from lawsuits.
In a previous Breitbart News report, Biden spoke at an MSNBC forum in 2019 alongside gun control organizations such as March for Our Lives where he expressed his support for gun manufacturers to be subject to lawsuits.
At the speech, Biden suggested that the PLCC be repealed. He declared, “No other outfit in history has gotten this kind of protection” and asserted that the legal actions would bring about “change overnight.”
In a subsequent occasion on February 7, 2020, Breitbart News covered Biden’s remarks to a New Hampshire crowd, in which he stated that it was a “mistake” to shield firearms manufacturers from lawsuits. He continued, “The first thing I’m going to do as president is work to get rid of that.”
Later that month, Breitbart News recalled how Biden called out gun manufacturers at a South Carolina rally and boasted, “I’m going to take you down.”
According to a report by The Salt Lake Tribune, Utah Senator Mike Lee asked Garland about his views on removing protections for gun manufacturers. Garland responded, “I have not thought myself deeply about this. I don’t think it raises a Second Amendment issue.”
When he was questioned if he is in favor of Biden’s plans to ban so-called “assault weapons”, Garland responded, “Where there is room under the law for the president’s policies to be pursued, then I think the president is entitled to pursue them.”
Biden’s track record as a gun control proponent is well-documented. From his support of gun-free zones at schools to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, Biden is Gun Control Inc.’s guy. With Democrats in control of the House and the Senate, there will most certainly be attempts to ram gun control down our throats. If they can’t beat us legislatively, they will most certainly use the courts to undermine the Second Amendment. Pro-gun organizations should be ready to lawyer up and use whatever means possible to keep courts from destroying our rights.
-
White House2 days agoSecret Service Members Confirm That Joe Biden’s Mental Faculties are Indeed in “Bad Shape,” Dan Bongino Says
-
Around The World3 days agoBiden Authorizes Attack on Syria, Kamala FURIOUS It Wasn’t Her Call
-
White House4 days agoSLEEPY? Biden Yet to Deliver First State of the Union Amid Confused Public Appearances
-
Free Speech2 days agoWikipedia’s Founder is Creating New Free Speech Competitor to Website, Citing Leftist Domination
-
Free Speech3 days agoTrump Preparing Case Before “Facebook Supreme Court” to Restore Platform Access
-
States4 days agoSICK: California Bill Proposes to Fine Retailers That Maintain Separate Clothing and Toys Sections for Boys and Girls
-
States4 days agoMichigan Republicans Demand Inquiry Into Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s Murderous COVID-19 Nursing Home Policies
-
Congress1 day agoArizona’s Paul Gosar Proposes Amending Coronavirus Package to Replace Pork with $10,000 Stimulus Checks
