Connect with us

Border Security

‘There Can Be No Retreat’: Dan Bongino Urges President Trump To Fight

Published

on

Dan Bongino implored President Donald Trump not to back down Saturday in Trump’s quest to do whatever it takes to build the southern border wall. Trump can build the wall by declaring a national emergency to access Department of Defense funds for the mission.

“He shouldn’t back down…This is it. To all the Republicans up in Congress, and the senators up there. This is it. This is the fight. There can be no retreat, there can be no backing down,” Bongino said.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IfUdgvhsWA

Trending: Dr. Anthony Fauci Plotted ‘Global Vaccine Action Plan’ with Bill Gates Before Pushing COVID Panic and Doubts About Hydroxychloroquine Treatments

President Donald Trump has no reason to hesitate in declaring a national emergency to build the southern border Wall. The national emergency is real and it’s hitting us hard.

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Formally declaring a national emergency is not a big deal, especially if you look at all the foreign-focused situations that prompted President Trump’s predecessors to use the emergency option — including Barack Obama, who declared 13 national emergencies, 11 of which are still active. Did the mainstream media call Obama a dictator for using this strategy?

President Trump has declared three national emergencies himself. Surely the systemic destruction of the United States through open-borders crime and drug proliferation warrants a fourth push on the “emergency” button. If you look at all the dimensions of this issue — the drugs, the human trafficking, the cartel violence, the suspected terrorists routinely apprehended — the Border Crisis merits several national emergencies, at least.

Here are the 31 national emergencies that are in effect right now. Are these situations making you panic at all times? Are these problems bigger than the existential threat of losing our borders? You decide.

  1. 1979: Blocking Iranian Government Property

Our oldest still-running national emergency comes from the Iran hostage crisis. Does the existence of the Ayatollah constitute a national emergency? Yes. Should Barack Obama have sent the Iranians $1.7 billion in cash pallets? No, that should have been another national emergency right there.

2. 1994: Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 

Bill Clinton regulated WMD’s.

3. 1995: Prohibiting Transactions With Terrorists Who Threaten To Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process

This bans any dealing with Hamas and Hezbollah, but again it does not seem like the spirit of this national emergency has been upheld very well by some of our recent leaders. The Obama White House stifled anti-Hezbollah efforts to make it easier to finalize their disastrous Iran deal.

4. 1995: Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources

Some regulations on the oil business.

5. 1995: Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers

Does building a Wall count as “Blocking Assets” for drug dealers?

6. 1996: Regulations of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels With Respect To Cuba

The Cuban Missile Crisis was no laughing matter, and the Communist threat close to our shores has not gone anywhere.

7. 1997: Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan

This national emergency did not prevent Bill Clinton from bombing a Sudanese medicine factory during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which prompted Christopher Hitchens’ greatest ever anti-war headline in The Nation: “Close But No Cigar.”

8. 2001: Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans

How about blocking migration of persons who threaten national stabilization efforts of the United States?

9. 2001: Continuation of Export Control Regulations

Something to do with exports.

10. 2001: Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks

9/11 was a national emergency. How Bush and Cheney responded to 9/11 left us in perpetual national emergency.

11. 2001: Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism

This national emergency is a no-brainer. But it didn’t stop Barack Obama from making transactions with persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism.

12. 2003: Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe

This is not more important to the United States than the security of our own border.

13. 2003: Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq Has An Interest

In 2013, Reuters pegged the total U.S. taxpayer cost of the Iraq War at $1.7 trillion, not including outstanding veteran benefits.

14. 2004: Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods To Syria

Bashar al-Assad has been a longtime target of the national security establishment in Washington, which does not seem to care quite as much about the national security threat on our southern border.

15. 2006: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus

Belarus is a country in Europe.

16. 2006: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Too bad this Bush-era national emergency is not called “Blocking Access of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Texas and Arizona.”

17. 2007: Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or its Democratic Processes and Institutions

Lebanon is a country with borders, much like the United States.

18. 2008: Continuing Certain Restrictions with Respect to North Korea and North Korean Nationals

Nobody ever made any real progress in North Korea until President Trump.

19. 2010: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia

Some pirate-related sanctions on Somalia.

20. 2011: Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related To Libya

Hillary Clinton took out Muammar Gaddafi and now there is an active slave trade in Libya.

21: 2011: Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations

Does this apply to the Clinton Foundation?

22. 2012: Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security or Stability of Yemen

Yemen is not known for its peace, security or stability, and neither is the United States in the age of open-borders mass migration.

23. 2014: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine

Ukraine and the United States of America are different countries located in different parts of the world.

24. 2014: Blocking Property of Certain Persons with Respect to South Sudan

Sudan is a place fraught with emergency, granted, but so is the United States in our borderless present.

25. 2014: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic

Drug cartels are contributing to the conflict in the American Republic.

26. 2015: Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela

The “suspending entry” part is good.

27. 2015: Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities

The criminal cartels in the United States are more tech-savvy than they let on, and pose serious threats to the American people.

28. 2015: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi

Burundi is in Africa.

29. 2017: Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption

President Trump’s first national emergency.

30. 2018: Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States election

President Trump won fair and square, it had nothing to do with the Russians.

31: 2018: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Nicaragua

The situation in Nicaragua is presenting itself at our southern border.

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

Border Security

Dan ‘McCain 2.0’ Crenshaw Outlines His Plan to Give Amnesty to Millions of Illegal Aliens

Crenshaw is a faux-conservative.

Published

on

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) recently outlined his plan to give amnesty to millions of illegal aliens while appearing on a podcast.

A clip is going viral on social media of Crenshaw detailing his plan to flood the U.S. with third-world migrants and crowd native workers from well-paying jobs in the marketplace.

“I put it in simple terms, uh, ya know, zero tolerance on illegal immigration. We truly lock down the border, and then we can have a conversation about a more streamlined legal immigration system that is based on merit rather than familial connections,” he said.

While Crenshaw may want to lock down the border (or so he claims), he is open to schemes that would allow the low-income workers to flood into the U.S. from desolate countries and squeeze Americans out of quality employment.

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“I’m willing to have a conversation about a more streamlined version of work visas,” he said.

Crenshaw noted that after the U.S. has “plugged the leak,” conservatives should embrace giving amnesty to the millions of illegal aliens that have broken the law to come into the country.

“I think restitution might be an option there… Here’s generally what I think. If you’ve committed a crime, a crime other than your VISA overstay or crossing the border illegally, I have zero tolerance for that. ICE should deport you,” Crenshaw said.

He went on to explain that conservatives need to recognize that amnesty is inevitable and surrender to the Left on the issue.

“If you’ve just been here working, we can’t deport 15-20 million people. That’s not feasible. Conservatives have to, like, recognize that fact,” he said.

The clip from Crenshaw on the podcast can be seen here:

In addition to being an amnesty lover, Crenshaw also supports red flag laws that eliminate due process and make a mockery of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution:

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) has revealed a bombshell, perhaps accidentally, that he supported red flag gun control since before he started his run for Congress, showing that he lied on the campaign trail about his firm support of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution.

“I’ve been thinking seriously about this policy for years. It was not something I recently heard of. The NRA supported well-crafted GVRO,” Crenshaw told Kaitlin Bennett of Liberty Hangout, referring to a gun violence restraining order that would allow a judge to order the seizure of firearms from an individual deemed a public safety risk.

Crenshaw has gone further than supporting GVROs. He publicly endorsed pre-crime legislation such as red flag laws and The Threat Assessment, Prevention, and Safety (TAPS) Act following mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton earlier this month.

After Bennett, an Infowars reporter and avid 2nd Amendment supporter, criticized Crenshaw on social media as a gun grabber, he sent a series of demeaning private messages to her on Twitter criticizing her activism and unwillingness to accept his excuses for infringing upon the 2nd Amendment. She exposed Crenshaw’s untoward behavior in a YouTube video.

“I hope you rethink your tactics in the future, because they are only effective at alienating people on both sides. You won’t ever persuade anyone, and you’ll drive out your allies,” Crenshaw wrote condescendingly to Bennett.

“When you alienate people, you remove yourself from any productive conversations. As you move forward as an activist, you should ask yourself if that’s really what you want,” he added.

Crenshaw was recently photographed having one of these “productive conversations” with gun confiscation activists from Moms Demand Action, a front group funded by billionaire former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg.

Crenshaw has picked up where the late songbird John McCain left off, continuing his predecessor’s promotion of globalism wrapped in the U.S. flag to unsuspecting Republicans.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending