Connect with us

Big League National Security

Tom Fitton Sues For ALL Anthony Weiner Laptop Emails

Published

on

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton is suing for all of the Anthony Weiner emails that the government possesses.

As observers in Washington look at the fading Robert Mueller investigation, one thing is clear: the Operation Crossfire Hurricane team went to great lengths to cover up Weiner and Huma’s emails during Weiner’s sex abuse trial.

Here is Fitton’s video announcement, followed by our reporting on how Peter Strzok used his FBI badge to personally cover up the Weiner investigation:

Trending: Stanford University Babies Demand “Removal” of College Republicans from Campus

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Big League Politics reported:

FBI agent Peter Strzok secretly manipulated the warrant to search Anthony Weiner’s laptop in order to protect Hillary Clinton from prosecution.

Strzok was the main operative in the Operation Crossfire Hurricane plot to doom President Donald Trump. So of course he was assigned to handle the revelation that Huma Abedin’s husband Anthony Weiner had thousands of classified Hillary Clinton emails on his laptop, which were discovered in the course of an NYPD investigation into his sexual interactions with a minor, for which Weiner is now in prison.

Chuck Marler, longtime former FBI Special Surveillance Group member and current whistleblower against Robert Mueller, explained to Big League Politics exactly how Strzok made sure to protect Hillary Clinton:

“On October 29, 2016 Strzok broke FBI policy and emailed a sealed draft warrant for the Weiner emails to his personal email. Obviously he wanted to work on the draft out of view of the FBI and most likely allow someone else to view it for their input. What did he put in the warrant that was filed the following day?

First, he limited the scope of the review to keywords and only up to two pages of each email. He only wanted to know if the email was listed with a classification, he already knew she had the markings removed before being sent. So he knew classifications wouldn’t appear.

Second, he put in language to allow outside individuals to help the FBI search. Who were the outside individuals?

Third and most importantly, he listed in the warrant what would be use to determined if a crime was committed. As in, if she knowingly transmitted secret emails or if she committed GROSS NEGLIGENCE

How convenient, that’s exactly what he changed in the exoneration draft for Comey. He knew that whatever emails they found on Weiner’s computer, they had already ruled that Clinton didn’t commit Gross Negligence in sending them.”

Marler’s explanation is accurate.

Take a look at the full Weiner warrant published by The Washington Post.

Now take a look at this CNN piece co-authored by Valerie Jarrett’s own daughter:“Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey’s earlier draft language describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” the sources said.

The drafting process was a team effort, CNN is told, with a handful of people reviewing the language as edits were made, according to another US official familiar with the matter.

The shift from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for “gross negligence.”

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.”

CNN passage co-authored by Valerie Jarrett’s daughter ends

And that is how Peter Strzok protected Hillary Clinton after it was discovered that she allowed thousands of her classified emails to end up on the laptop computer of now-incarcerated Anthony Weiner.

Big League National Security

Biden’s Syria Strikes Killed at Least 22 People – More than Both of Trump’s Strikes on the Country

Biden’s airstrike killed 22 people.

Published

on

President Joe Biden has surpassed President Trump’s body-count for US involvement in Syria’s bloody and seemingly endless civil war- killing more people in one batch of airstrikes than were killed in both of Trump’s military actions targeting Syrian government forces in the country in 2017 and 2018.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights has indicated that 22 pro-Assad militia fighters were killed in the airstrike, which reportedly struck three trucks after they crossed the Iraq-Syria border. The airstrikes were staged in response to missile attacks that killed an international contractor and injured US military service members earlier this month, with the Biden administration pointing to Iranian backing of Shia militias in both Iraq and Syria.

Trump’s first missile strike on Syrian government facilities in response to a chemical weapons incident in 2017. Ranges of causalities range from nine to 16 deaths. President Trump oversaw a far more aggressive military campaign to destroy the ISIS caliphate, while dealing with the Syrian government in a more conservative and measured fashion.

Observers maintain that President Trump’s second missile strike on the Syrian government didn’t even kill anyone, with the Syrian government describing six soldiers and three civilians as having been injured in the series of missile strikes that targeted scientific and alleged chemical munitions facilities.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

President Trump was in office for four years and avoided inflicting casualties of the kind Biden has in just over a month- on a questionable intelligence basis. Biden’s action may suggest his administration intends to further pursue aggressive action and regime change in Syria, a long-sought priority of the western globalist establishment.

This military action was by every indication more lethal and serious than anything Trump implemented in Syria or Iraq during his presidency- including the killing of Iranian terrorist leader Qassem Soleimani. The corporate-establishment media has largely glossed over the event, refusing to scrutinize the questionable intelligence behind the consequential airstrikes.


Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending