Connect with us

Border Security

Trump Threatens Citizenship Prospects for Those Using Government Benefits, Feds See Instant 20% Drop in Enrollment

It turns out illegal aliens are using government benefits after all.

Published

on

President Donald J. Trump is working on another plan to put America First, as he promised on the campaign trail.

“Immigrants are turning down government help to buy infant formula and healthy food for their young children because they’re afraid the Trump administration could bar them from getting a green card if they take federal aid,” said Politico.

When Politico says immigrants, they really mean illegal aliens. (More on that in a second).

Trending: Supreme Court Rules That Foreign Soros-Backed Operatives Do Not Have First Amendment Rights

“Agencies in at least 18 states say they’ve seen drops of up to 20 percent in enrollment, and they attribute the change largely to fears about the immigration policy,” said Politico. “The Trump administration hasn’t officially put the policy in place yet, but even without a formal rule, families are already being scared away from using services, health providers say.”

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This was clearly a difficult piece for Politico to write. They had to walk a tightrope, trying not to admit that illegals receive government benefits (a decades-old liberal lie) while still painting Trump as an evil man.

“The immigration proposal, which White House officials are working on ahead of the midterms as a way to energize the Republican base, would primarily affect legal immigrants already in the U.S. who are seeking a green card and people applying for legal admission to the U.S.,” the piece said.

That is clear double-speak. If a person is already living in the United States but does not hold a green card, he or she is likely here illegally. Politico veils that fact in the article, though, for obvious political reasons.

In reality, there are very few scenarios in which someone legally residing in the United States would not already have a permanent resident status (a Green Card) or citizenship. Such examples would be asylum seekers or those granted “temporary protected status,” according to AllLaw.

“[The policy] could also affect undocumented immigrants if they want to seek legal permanent residency in the future — a change that would represent a substantial expansion of the definition of public charge,” according to Politico. 

So illegals are using government benefits? Who could have guessed?

Politico said that the primary government program which has seen a decline in enrollment is WIC.

“The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides Federal grants to States for supplemental foods, health care referrals, and nutrition education for low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and non-breastfeeding postpartum women, and to infants and children up to age five who are found to be at nutritional risk,” according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

If anyone is going to be using such services on the American taxpayer dole, it should be American citizens.


Follow Peter D’Abrosca on Twitter: @pdabrosca

Border Security

Supreme Court Rules President Trump Cannot Touch DACA with John Roberts Casting the Deciding Vote

SCOTUS stands for amnesty.

Published

on

The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) determined on Thursday via a 5-4 ruling that President Donald Trump cannot end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which protects some 800,000 illegals from being deported from the country.

Trump had sought to reverse an executive order made by former President Barack Obama which granted amnesty to the illegals, believing Obama’s order was unconstitutional. Although it is well-understood that presidents have the authority to reverse executive orders, SCOTUS arbitrarily revoked that power for Trump because he did not give them a reason they found satisfactory for doing so. Trump is now effectively banned from revoking DACA until he can give an explanation that the courts and left-wing special interests determine as acceptable.

This is an example of the activist judiciary at its worst, and the man who flipped is yet again Chief Justice John Roberts, the same despicable individual who protected Obamacare and abortion rights.

Far-left lawyers seized on the coronavirus pandemic to make their case to keep the privileges for illegal immigrants, claiming that DACA recipients included “dentists, pharmacists, physician assistants, home health aides, technicians.”

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Termination of DACA during this national health emergency would be catastrophic,” the immigration attorneys claimed in their April 2 filing.

However, hospitals were letting personnel go throughout the COVID-19 pandemic as nurses danced in TikTok videos due to lack of activity on the job. The lack of logic behind their argument did not seem to matter to SCOTUS, who bought it hook, line and sinker.

The SCOTUS ruling comes after a bipartisan push by corporate Republicans and Democrats who have backed widespread amnesty to push down the cost of labor and increase their massive profits:

Billionaire heirs Charles and David Koch are gearing up to wage a public influence campaign in favor of granting amnesty to ‘dreamers,’ illegal immigrants brought to the United States at a young age.

TIME magazine reported that the inheritors of the massive Koch family fortune plan to use their extensive political infrastructure to exert muscle with the hopes of securing a legal status for the approximately 700,000 DACA illegals. The political move would come as the latest effort in the Kochs’ long history of seeking to increase levels of immigration to the United States even higher, further than the current record-breaking annual flow.

Formerly holding a prominent role in national Republican politics, the Koch brothers fell into disrepute among conservatives and Republicans for a series of policy views at odds with the everyday citizen, including financial support for wage-sinking mass immigration. The Kochs declined to support Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, although they had previously been among the most extensive and prolific political donors in the United States…

While fashioning themselves as “free market capitalists,” the family fortune that the eponymous Koch brothers use to advance their political ideals was obtained through methods foreign to their own conception of free markets, to put it mildly. The founder of the family business, Fred Koch, became a multi-millionaire after accepting a partnership with the Soviet Union under its leader Joseph Stalin to build oil refineries. Somewhat shockingly, the overseas business activities of Fred Koch also included the construction of a plant in National Socialist Germany under Adolf Hitler in the 1930’s.

The notion of reclaiming the judiciary is looking more like a pipe dream with rulings such as this and the LGBT mandate against private businesses being approved by so-called conservative justices.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending