Connect with us

News

Trump Threatens to Withhold Bailout Funds from States with Sanctuary Cities

Published

on

President Donald Trump recently warned Democrats that he will be calling for “adjustments” for sanctuary cities as a prerequisite for bailing out states.

The president hinted that he might withhold funding from states that maintain “radical left” sanctuary cities in the next round of emergency Wuhan virus relief.

Democrats are demanding that the federal government drop at least $500 billion into state governments which have faced significant shortfalls since the Wuhan virus lockdowns.

Trending: Polls Reveal Americans, Liberals Dramatically Overestimate Police Killings of Unarmed Black Men

That said, Trump commented that he doesn’t want to give handouts to Democrat-run states “to recover 25 years of bad management.” “If it’s COVID-related, I guess we can talk about it,” President Trump said to reporters at the White House.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“But we want certain things also, including sanctuary city adjustments. We have so many people in sanctuary cities, which I don’t even think are popular, even by radical left folks.”

“People are being protected that shouldn’t be protected, and a lot of bad things are happening with sanctuary cities,” Trump continued.

Trump expressed favorability towards the concept of payroll tax cuts and then pivoted the discussion to the possibility of bailing out state governments. “The problem with the states is we’re not looking to recover 25 years of bad management and give them the money they lost. That’s unfair to other states,” Trump stated.

The president then indicated that for state governments to be eligible for more bailout aid, they would have to get tough on cities within their jurisdictions that refuse to work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).“If we are going to do something for states, I think they probably want something having to do with sanctuary cities and other different points that we can discuss a little bit later on,” he stated.

President Trump said he may need sanctuary cities to make “adjustments” before they receive any funding.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled back in February that the Trump administration is legally allowed to withhold millions of dollars in federal law enforcement grants from states and local governments that do not work with ICE. This ruling represented a solid victory for Trump in his fight against sanctuary jurisdictions.

These polices are solid steps in containing mass migration.

However, the Trump administration must have more comprehensive policies to handle this matter.

Which is why Trump must not only win re-election in 2020 but also have a solid America First contingent in both the House and Senate to see his vison through.

The very social fabric of the American nation state is at stake, and Trump will have to deliver on his promises to keep America in the 21st century on stable footing.

Immigration

Mara Elvira Salazar is No Friend of America First Nationalism

Republican leaders would be wise to ignore all of her political advice.

Published

on

If there’s one Republican leader that young activists should never listen to, it’s Florida Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar. 

Salazar, who is a Cuban American, has been an outspoken advocate of loosening U.S. immigration laws. In fact, she even confronted known immigration hawk and key Trump adviser Stephen Miller at a Republican Study Committee weekly lunch on February 24, 2021. She specifically criticized Trump’s immigration message and demanded that the GOP be more inclusive in its outreach.

“I told him [Miller] that the GOP needs to attract the browns,” stated Salazar. “We, for the last 30 years since Ronald Reagan, have not sent the right message to the browns,” she continued. “Reagan was the last guy who gave a path to citizenship to 3 million people … 35 years ago. It’s time for us to do the same thing that Reagan did.”

Salazar doubled down on her pro-immigration message when she went on Larry Kudlow’s show on March 2 and declared that former President Donald Trump would have done better with Hispanics by advocating for looser immigration. Journalist Ryan Girdusky noted how some of Trump’s advisers were already pushing for amnesty lite policies:

Girdusky added that Salazar was rather unhinged in her criticism of Miller’s vision for the GOP:

Salazar made a lot of noise about the Hispanic vote, despite ignoring how Trump improved his Hispanic numbers between 2016 and his re-election bid in 2020 from 28% to 32%. And he did so without much Hispandering or campaigning on passing amnesty. 

The unsavory fact that the GOP consultant class and the likes of Salazar refuse to acknowledge is that the Black Lives Matter unrest alone likely pushed significant segments of the Hispanic population into the Democrats’ arms. BLM radicalism alienated Americans of all backgrounds., but Hispanics were not having any of this kind of ruckus. Even Hispanic Democrats, of all groups, largely supported strong military action during the riots.

In reality, Hispanic support for Trump is largely based on his bluster and political bluntness, which many minority groups find comfort in. 

However, Republicans like Salazar gets it all wrong by thinking that expanding immigration both legal and illegal is a key to the Republican Party success. The Republican Party will have to concede that they can make gains with Hispanics at the margins but they cannot expect to win the majority of the Hispanic vote due to Hispanics’ propensity to support many causes ranging from gun control to more government involvement in healthcare. Data from the Pew Research Center demonstrates these beliefs among Hispanics. Nevertheless, there are some avenues for outreach with this demographic  but they must be done right. 

The key for Republican success is the white working class voters, which played a crucial role in putting Trump over the top in the Midwest back in 2016. These voters are not the most reliable in terms of turnout, but they comprise a vast segment of the American electorate. Any candidate who can activate them could potentially build a hegemonic electoral coalition for years to come. The goal for a sane Republican campaign is to maximize turnout and support among the WWC. 

Such inroads with WWC voters are more important than meeting a diversity quota the likes of Salazar and naive Republican strategists would like the party to pursue. Any nationalist campaign worth its salt would be promoting the following: Infrastructure projects targeting the Midwest, the restriction of both illegal and legal immigration, and re-shoring programs to bring jobs back. 

On the other hand, following Salazar’s program is the way that the GOP will become irrelevant and alienate many WWC voters who are already on the fence with regards to the Republican Party. These voters are not going to gravitate towards Republicans just because of the “R” next to their name. They still must be catered to and pushing for amnesty is one way to turn working class voters off.

Under Salazar’s watch, the GOP will simply be going back to the politically correct ways of the Bush administration. To tap into the sleeping giants that is the WWC, Republican leaders should ignore everything Salazar has to say and get fully behind nationalist policies such as immigration restriction, infrastructure development, and re-shoring. 

 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending