Connect with us

White House

Trump’s Top Trade Advisor Rips Dr. Anthony Fauci as the White House Stands by Fauci

Why is the White House standing by this weasel?

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s top trade advisor Peter Navarro took aim at Dr. Anthony Fauci in a USA Today op/ed on Tuesday.

“In late January, when I was making the case on behalf of the president to take down the flights from China, Fauci fought against the president’s courageous decision — which might well have saved hundreds of thousands of American lives,” Navarro wrote.

“When I warned in late January in a memo of a possibly deadly pandemic, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases was telling the news media not to worry,” he continued.

Trending: Ex-Soviet Leader Gorbachev: US Capitol Riot “Planned in Advance, And It Is Clear by Whom”

“When I was working feverishly on behalf of the president in February to help engineer the fastest industrial mobilization of the health care sector in our history, Fauci was still telling the public the China virus was low risk. When we were building new mask capacity in record time, Fauci was flip-flopping on the use of masks,” Navarro added.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Navarro warned the public in his op/ed that Fauci “has been wrong about everything I have interacted with him on.”

“And when Fauci was telling the White House Coronavirus Task Force that there was only anecdotal evidence in support of hydroxychloroquine to fight the virus, I confronted him with scientific studies providing evidence of safety and efficacy. A recent Detroit hospital study showed a 50% reduction in the mortality rate when the medicine is used in early treatment,” Navarro wrote.

“Now Fauci says a falling mortality rate doesn’t matter when it is the single most important statistic to help guide the pace of our economic reopening. The lower the mortality rate, the faster and more we can open,” he added. “So when you ask me whether I listen to Dr. Fauci’s advice, my answer is: only with skepticism and caution.”

The White House is distancing themselves from Navarro’s scathing op/ed against Dr. Fauci, with the White House spokesman claiming that President Donald Trump values Dr. Fauci’s supposed expertise.

“To the notion that there’s opposition research and that there’s Fauci versus the president, it couldn’t be further from the truth,” White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said to reporters during a Monday press briefing. “Dr. Fauci and the President have always had a very good working relationship.”

Big League Politics has reported on how Dr. Fauci may have funded the research that caused the COVID-19 pandemic to begin with:

Dr. Anthony Fauci, leader of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), is denying the possibility that the coronavirus pandemic could have originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats, and what’s out there now is very, very strongly leaning toward this [virus] could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated-the way the mutations have naturally evolved. A number of very qualified evolutionary biologists have said that everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that it evolved in nature and then jumped species,” Fauci said during an interview with National Geographic that was published on Monday.

After Fauci was asked about whether a virus that was wild could escape from a lab, he continued to spin and deflect blame.

“But that means it was in the wild to begin with. That’s why I don’t get what they’re talking about [and] why I don’t spend a lot of time going in on this circular argument,” said Fauci…

Big League Politics reported last week about how Fauci’s bureaucracy sent money to the Wuhan Institute for the stated purpose of funding coronavirus research in bats shortly before the pandemic shook the world.

It was revealed that the NIAID supported the $3.7 million grant in 2019 which was approved by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to the Wuhan Institute after another project costing the same figure expired. The federal bureaucracy has subsidized this kind of research with the taxpayer footing the bill to the tune of $7.4 million.

Even U.S. intelligence is beginning to admit that it is possible that the virus emerged from a laboratory. Big League Politics has been reporting on this possibility for months, and now even mainstream fake news outlets like the Washington Post are acknowledging this could be the case.

Condemning Dr. Fauci for his role in the pandemic may not be enough. Criminal charges may be in order for this mad scientist who wants to keep the public under lockdown for as long as possible.

White House

President Donald Trump Pledges “Orderly Transition” on January 20th

“The greatest first term in Presidential history.”

Published

on

President Donald Trump pledged an orderly transition of power in a statement released early Thursday morning, appearing to recognize that Democrat Joe Biden would be sworn in as President in January.

Even though I totally disagree with the outcome of the election, and the facts bear me out, nevertheless there will be an orderly transition on January 20th. I have always said we would continue our fight to ensure that only legal votes were counted. While this represents the end of the greatest first term in presidential history, it’s only the beginning of our fight to Make America Great Again!

The President’s announcement came minutes after the Senate certified electoral college slates voting for Joe Biden’s history. Vice President Mike Pence recognized Biden as the winner with 306 electoral college votes.

Twitter had temporarily silenced President Trump’s personal Twitter in the wake of a protest outside of the Capitol in which demonstrators entered. the halls of Congress. Longtime Trump aide Dan Scavino released the statement just before 4AM.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The recognition of a transition now heralds the end of President Donald Trump’s first term, with the President alluding to the possibility of securing the second term he was denied in his statement in a future campaign. Joe Biden will be inaugurated as President.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending