Connect with us

Tech

Twitter Bans Popular Conservative Account On Christmas Eve For Criticism of Pedophilia

Published

on

In yet another act of anti-Conservative bias by Twitter, Breck Worsham, a popular Conservative woman with nearly 83,000 Twitter followers has been permanently suspended by Twitter.

Worsham’s account was banned on Christmas Eve after she posted tweets critical of pedophiles and Twitter’s decision to allow for pro-pedophile accounts to still remain active while deeming Conservative accounts to be “violations of terms of service”.

Trending: President Donald Trump to Hold “Tremendous” MAGA Rally in Georgia for GOP Senators

On Christmas Eve, Worsham received the following email from Twitter informing her that her anti-pedophile tweet “violates rules against hateful conduct”.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The tweet which Worsham posted said:

“Kill ’em all…Let God sort ’em out…”

Worsham said her tweet was in direct reference to violent pedophiles.

While Twitter claims it is a violation of their terms of service to call for people who rape children to be killed, it is worth noting that Twitter doesn’t consider assassination threats against President Donald Trump or genocidal calls to murder the Jews and white people as violations of their terms of service.

SEE ARCHIVED EVIDENCE OF VERIFIED LEFT-WING & JIHADI TWITTER HATE HERE:
Worsham released a statement on her Instagram about her ban:
“I was notified this morning, December 24, 2018, that Twitter had suspended my account on the grounds of “hate speech” because I spoke out against pro-pedophile accounts on the platform and called for the death penalty to pedophiles.
Bans are nothing new to me, as I have been here many times before. What is troubling, however, is the ongoing war on Conservatives and those who seek to shine light upon the truth.
I’m not the first account to be banned for telling the truth, and I certainly will not be the last. Laura Loomer was famously banned from most social media platforms just this past Thanksgiving for doing no more than that.”

Like me, Worsham was also banned from Twitter during a holiday, which poses the question: Is big tech banning large and popular Conservative accounts on holidays to draw attention away from their silencing of Conservatives?

While Worsham, who is pro-Trump, has been banned for criticizing pedophilia, it is worth noting that Twitter has not banned famous left wing celebrities who have themselves been accused or charged with pedophilia, and even encouraged acts of pedophilia against small children.

Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey have both been accused of sexually assaulting minors, yet both of them still have verified Twitter accounts and access to Twitter, despite Twitter’s claim that verification and access to Twitter would also depend on users’ “off platform behavior”.

In June of 2018, Peter Fonda, a left wing actor, tweeted, in reference to Donald Trump’s 12-year-old son:

“WE SHOULD RIP BARRON TRUMP FROM HIS MOTHER’S ARMS AND PUT HIM IN A CAGE WITH PEDOPHILES AND SEE IF MOTHER WILL STAND UP AGAINST THE GIANT A—HOLE SHE IS MARRIED TO. 90 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE STREETS ON THE SAME WEEKEND IN THE COUNTRY. F—.”

 

Fonda’s tweet was so violent that it prompted an investigation by the US Secret Service. Not only did Twitter not make Fonda delete the tweet, but he remains on Twitter and still has a verified account.

However, in November 2017, Twitter removed verified status from both me — Laura Loomer — and Tommy Robinson for our reports about Islamic terrorism.

By banning both me and Robinson while refusing to punish Fonda, Spacey, and Weinstein, Twitter is signaling that reporting the truth about Islamic terrorism is worse than raping and sexually abusing children, or calling for children to be attacked by pedophiles.

Various Conservative commentators and content creators have chimed in on Twitter’s bizarre support of pedophiles and blatant bias of Conservatives.

https://twitter.com/MarkDice/status/1077322782038544385

Mark Dice said,

Twitter suspended me for “hate speech” after I told Kevin Spacey to “burn in Hell” and called him a scumbag after the previous allegations surfaced. Such great terms of service Twitter has these days. Meanwhile, they allow admitted pedophiles to have accounts. That’s liberalism.”

https://twitter.com/GodOfDeathirl/status/1075480422111432705

While Conservatives continue to be silenced and de-platformed for their views and support of President Trump, Twitter has become a safe haven for pedophiles and sexual predators who go unpunished by the left leaning tyrants in Silicon Valley who continue to use their terms of service as a form of political warfare to silence and quell political opposition.

On September 5, 2018, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey testified before Congress under oath and said Twitter does not have a bias against Conservatives. The next day, Dorsey banned Alex Jones and Infowars from Twitter. Jones, along with being one of the most popular Conservatives on the Internet, was also an outspoken critic of pedophilia.

With the evidence presented, one thing is clear:

Either Jack Dorsey is pro-pedophilia, he is bias against conservatives, or both.

Regardless of what the answer is, it certainly isn’t a good look for Twitter.

Laura Loomer is a conservative investigative journalist and activist. Originally from Arizona, Laura began her career working as an undercover journalist for Project Veritas from 2015-2017. She covers politics, anti-Semitism, immigration, terrorism, the Islamification of the West, and voter fraud. Loomer’s investigations have been broadcasted on every major national mainstream media outlet in the United States, as well as many international publications. Support Laura Loomer’s Independent Journalism here: PayPal.me/lauraloomer

 
Subscribe to lauraloomer.us today.
Follow Laura Loomer on Facebook.

Follow Laura Loomer on Instagram.

 

 

 

Free Speech

YOUR NEW MASTER: Twitter’s Head of Conversational Safety, a “Young, Queer Asian-American Businesswoman,” is “Rethinking” the Concept of User Safety

Do you trust someone like her to make Twitter “a safer place”?

Published

on

The media company Protocol, a sister site of Politico, recently published an article about Twitter’s new “head of product for conversational safety,” Christine Su. It claims that Su, a “young, queer Asian-American businesswoman,” is revolutionizing what “user safety” on social media means.

Twitter hired Su around six months ago to be in charge of “what might be the most difficult task on Twitter,” despite having no apparent experience in politics, programming, and media relations. But Twitter seems to like her for her “creative” and “somewhat radical new ideas” about user safety.

“As a queer woman of color who is an Asian American in tech in rural America, that experience is a very intersectional one. I’ve had plenty of experiences moving through spaces where I wanted more safety,” Su said.

Protocol writes that Su’s vision incorporates “transformative and procedural justice.” Transformative justice ostensibly refers to a non-retributive form of repairing harm done to someone and preventing it from happening again; procedural justice to enacting a set of rules that “make harm rarer in the first place.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This all sounds nice and dandy—but beware. So-called transformative and procedural justice will not benefit you, but will crush you. Anything that’s perceived as “harmful” against “women and people from marginalized groups” can and will be used to censor you. Christine Su may reassuringly claim that “the point is not to make the entire world a safe space,” but she’s open about the fact that she will help give the Coalition of the Fringes more control over what people are allowed to do and say on Twitter.

Examples from the article:

  • Creating an audio hangout feature called “Spaces,” which will allow users to determine who is allowed to participate, as well as who can speak and when. (Note that it’s being tested on “women and marginalized groups of people” first.)
  • Potentially doubling down on functions that “encourage people to read content before reposting it.” (Which is exclusively done to censor or limit the reach of conservative and other right-wing content.)
  • Building tools that “create private pathways for apologies, forgiveness and deescalation.” (The finer details are still a work in progress according to Su.)
  • Defining what a “meaningful conversation” is. (Would people like Su think that anything right-wingers say or believe belongs in a “meaningful conversation”? Let’s just say I wouldn’t bet money on it…)

You know full well that a company like Facebook would shortly follow suit. After all, it’s not just Twitter that Su is “revolutionizing,” but the concept of social media itself. Figure out where all this is heading.

Now is as good a time as ever to plug our Parler:

Follow Big League Politics on Parler: @BigLeaguePol

Follow Evan James on Parler: @CatholicEJames

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending