Connect with us

Snowflakes

UNC Wants to Spend $5.3 Million in Taxpayer Funds to Build ‘Silent Sam Education Center’

Published

on

The University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill proposed Monday spending millions of taxpayer dollars to build an education center to house the Confederate “Silent Sam” monument that was illegally toppled by students in August.

“The University of North Carolina Board of Trustees proposed a new $5.3 million construction project to create a history and education center to house Silent Sam monument,” said ABC11

“UNC’s Board of Trustees proposed building a new area in Odum Village to place the Confederate monument, ” the report said. It will have at least one smart classroom and, potentially, shuttles to link it to campus.”

Trending: Stanford University Babies Demand “Removal” of College Republicans from Campus

“[UNC Chancellor Carol] Folt said the construction would cost an estimated $5.3 million. She said the building will place Silent Sam into context and help teach a more full history of the university,” the report continued.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

North Carolina laws that protect historical monuments dictate that Silent Sam must, in some capacity, be returned the UNC Campus. The school’s board of trustees put Monday’s meeting off for several months, but were forced to reckon with the no-win situation that their own radical communist students put them in when they lawlessly brought Silent Sam down.

“Highly pertinent aspects that we thoroughly considered included: public safety; preservation of the Artifacts; cost-effectiveness; potential disruption of University functions; input from the community; legal issues; linking the solution to other key mission-specific historical initiatives already underway; and more,” the Board’s report said. “We also did a preliminary examination of off-campus options. However, because they are not currently allowed by law, we are not able to offer them as part of a path that is lawful and lasting.”

The school already failed in its response to rioting communists by telling police to stand down while the monument was destroyed. Now, they want the North Carolina taxpayer to pay for poor decision making. It is a perfect case of how the government works for nobody.

Snowflakes

Stanford University Babies Demand “Removal” of College Republicans from Campus

A new low of intolerance.

Published

on

Left-wing crybabies at Stanford University are demanding that the school’s College Republicans chapter be wholly removed from campus in a new article for the campus newspaper, citing a laundry list of violations against the liberal religion. The appeal for deplatforming was made in an article in the Stanford Daily.

Stanford CR’s are known as a strong America First chapter of the organization, refusing the bow before the establishment College Republicans’ modus operandi of insider connections and backroom deals with political power brokers.

California College Republicans are pledging to fight back, refusing to cave as the Stanford Daily’s Claire Dinshaw demands the Stanford College Republicans be purged from campus. Dinshaw describes herself as a senior at the elite university minoring in political science and feminism, gender and sexuality studies.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Stanford Republicans responded to the display of intolerance on Friday.

Dinshaw cites the standard university-liberal schpiel of “racist, misogynistic and hateful rhetoric” in her censorship demand, in addition to claiming supposed “transphobic rhetoric.” Dinshaw also refers to incidences of the Stanford College Republicans fighting back against Antifa-style thugs who have attempted to disrupt their events, claiming that publicizing the identities of left-wing militants who have tried to destroy their materials and presentations represents some sort of mortal threat to their lives.

Dinshaw’s political purge demand may be facilitated by Stanford’s status as a private university, where left-wing managerial elites are free to silence and censor anyone who they deem a threat to liberal hegemony. However, the academic integrity of Stanford will be revealed as little more than a sham if university administrators cave to her demands, with free expression reserved for recitations of left-wing ideas.


Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending