Connect with us

Videos

VIDEO: BLP’s Sonny Joy Nelson Calls Out Feminist Supporters of Christine Ford

Published

on

https://youtu.be/oxSH5gccz8w

In the wake of the Ford/Kavanaugh hearing yesterday, one thing has become evident: Democrats are doing what they do best – using women.

Dr. Ford has gained a tremendous amount of support across the country and from members of the Committee – she’s even making bank from her GoFundMe.  Members of the Committee praised her for having the courage to step forward and report the sexual encounter she allegedly faced all those years ago.

While her story has many holes and is not likely to convict Kavanaugh of any crimes, her supporters – mostly feminists – argue that we should “believe all women.”

Trending: As Black Lives Matter Terrorists Burn Down America, Ben Shapiro Endorses Gun Control

But, where does that end? Do we believe all women simply because they’re female?  Last time I checked, being a woman doesn’t give you a free pass to falsely accuse men of sexual assault.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

One thing to keep in mind: women lie too.

There has been a lot of pressure on Kavanaugh to prove his innocence of these allegations, but that’s not how it works.  Do the words “innocent until proven guilty” ring a bell to anyone?

Kavanugh does not have to prove his innocence, Ford has to prove her assault.  These third-wave feminists that are advocating a war on men want that changed. The mere mention of sexual assault obviously means the accused is guilty. Because women never lie – right?

Another thing to keep in mind: accused does not equal guilty.

This idea that all women deserve to be believed simply for “coming forward” is a joke. Since when does a woman’s testimony hold more weight than a man’s?

Let the evidence talk for itself, not a emotional retelling of stories.  Let the evidence be the deciding factor in cases and not base them off a woman’s ability to manipulate – because, yes, they do that!

All this being said, I do believe that Christine Ford was sexually assaulted in her life and she does deserve a fair investigation. However, one thing is clear, Brett Kavanaugh is not at fault. I hope that when this is over with, Christine will give the entire Kavanaugh family the apology that they deserve.

WATCH:

Videos

VIDEO: Slow Joe Calls U.S. Troops ‘Stupid Bastards’ After They Refused to Clap for His Remarks

Published

on

Former vice president Joe Biden once called the U.S. troops “stupid bastards” when they didn’t immediately clap for his incoherent remarks during an address back in 2016 that was largely ignored by the fake news media.

“And I want you to know, notwithstanding what you hear about me, I have incredibly good judgment,” Biden said.

“One, I married Jill. And two, I appointed Johnson to the academy, I just want you to know that,” he added.

After there was a silence from the audience, that is when Biden became ornery and showed the troops his lack of respect for them.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Clap for that, you stupid bastards!” Biden exclaimed.

The clips of Biden losing his cool and disrespecting the military can be seen here:

Recently, there has been fake news about President Trump denigrating military personnel. Trump allegedly, according to unnamed sources, called dead war heroes “losers” and “suckers.” The controlled media has run with the story despite its dubiousness.

Big League Politics reported about how the disgraced propagandist behind the fake news hit piece was one of the architects of the main lies used to sell the public on the Iraq War:

The latest phony media controversy to malign President Donald Trump and impede his “America First” agenda is pertaining to comments he allegedly made to disparage military personnel in 2018.

The claim, published in The Atlantic, is that Trump called fallen soldiers “suckers” and “losers” when opting not to attend an American military cemetery in France. The article is based off of nothing but anonymous sources and has been rebutted on the record by many individuals who were on the trip with Trump.

The author of the article is long-time journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, a notorious war hawk who has a vested interest in keeping U.S. forces deployed overseas. He opposes President Trump’s non-interventionist foreign policy to bring the troops home and stop being the world policeman.

Goldberg was one of the chief propagandists who duped the American public into supporting the Iraq War. He was responsible for publishing the fake news that Iraq had connections with Al Qaeda.

He wrote an article in the New Yorker back in 2002 arguing that Iraq was the “great terror,” Saddam Hussein was guilty of genocide, and Iraq had “possible ties” to Al Qaeda.

“The allegations include charges that Ansar al-Islam has received funds directly from Al Qaeda; that the intelligence service of Saddam Hussein has joint control, with Al Qaeda operatives, over Ansar al-Islam; that Saddam Hussein hosted a senior leader of Al Qaeda in Baghdad in 1992; that a number of Al Qaeda members fleeing Afghanistan have been secretly brought into territory controlled by Ansar al-Islam; and that Iraqi intelligence agents smuggled conventional weapons, and possibly even chemical and biological weapons, into Afghanistan,” Goldberg wrote in his lengthy diatribe meant to convince the U.S. public to support an aggressive, unprovoked war with Iraq.

“There is some debate among arms-control experts about exactly when Saddam will have nuclear capabilities. But there is no disagreement that Iraq, if unchecked, will have them soon, and a nuclear-armed Iraq would alter forever the balance of power in the Middle East,” he continued, citing no sources to justify his claim that Saddam was on the verge of getting nukes.

“There is little doubt what Saddam might do with an atomic bomb or with his stocks of biological and chemical weapons,” Goldberg added.

While Trump is attacked over words he never even uttered, Biden gets a pass for insulting the troops directly to their faces on camera. These are the types of double standard that prove that the fake news media is the enemy of the people.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending