An aspiring “comedian” took abortion jokes too far last week in attempt to gain retweets.
Marcella Arguello tweeted that she looks “breathtaking” while having an abortion because she is literally “taking someone’s breath”, and it is “beautiful”.
This attempt at awful humor is the polar opposite of funny. Arguello fully admits that abortion is taking a child’s breath. Not caring that abortion is taking the life of a pre-born child, Arguello jumped at the chance to make a “joke”. While her attempt was to normalize abortion, she actual gave humanistic qualities to the pre-born by labeling the baby as “someone”.
Apparently, this is the low that wannabe comedians have gone to, to try and bring their name into the spotlight. Congrats Marcella, you’re in the spotlight. But it’s not for your jokes. Numerous outlets have highlighted Arguello’s beyond offensive tweet as going way too far. LiveAction described that the tweet “revealed a truth: that abortion takes the life of an actual human being”. The Daily Wire stated that the tweet “was obviously meant for shock value, but was also a litmus test for abortion supporters to see how radical they are.”
Of course, Arguello tried to use the coverage of her vile tweet to her advantage – thanking her “perfect abortion tweet”.
But, let’s not forget the backlash that comedian Kevin Hart received after using the word “gay” in some of his stand-ups and tweets from years ago. In lighthearted comedy, Hart described telling his son not to play with girly toys because “that’s gay”. Hart’s tweets from 2009 were labeled as ‘homophobic’, resulting in him stepping down from hosting the Oscars. Cosmopolitan Magazine described his tweets as “really, really awful”. Hart, after facing so much hate for simply using the word, has apologized yet continues to face resentment from Hollywood.
Interestingly, Cosmopolitan – amongst other Hollywood insiders – have not demanded an apology from Arguello for her overly offensive tweet. Her verbally abusive tweet is being labeled as “comedy”, giving it a pass.
Apparently, jokes about literally taking away a baby’s breath are more accepted than jokes about a certain group of people.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
President Trump Rejects Paying For Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Private Security
The royal celebrities will foot the bill.
President Trump made it clear on a Sunday tweet that British royals Prince Harry and Meghan Markle would have to pay for their own security costs upon moving full-time to the United States, clarifying that they wouldn’t receive federal security under an existing arrangement that covers British royals temporarily visiting the US.
I am a great friend and admirer of the Queen & the United Kingdom. It was reported that Harry and Meghan, who left the Kingdom, would reside permanently in Canada. Now they have left Canada for the U.S. however, the U.S. will not pay for their security protection. They must pay!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 29, 2020
The royal celebrities have distanced themselves from the Queen, apparently viewing themselves as victims of relentless paparazzi and media attention.
Harry and Markle initially moved to Canada after resigning from the royal family, but they’ve recently moved to Hollywood just before the Canadian border was closed to nonessential travel due to the Chinese coronavirus epidemic. The elitist couple apparently plans on reinventing themselves as American-style celebrities, and have hired a small army of media consultants and public relations agents to market their image.
When information of their move to Los Angeles became public knowledge, many began to speculate if they’d recieve taxpayer-funded security in a manner akin to British royals visiting the United States on official state vists. President Trump’s Sunday tweet appears to eliminate that possibility.
The thirteen colonies that became the United States rebelled against the yoke of the British monarchy for a reason. President Trump’s decision to cut off the wannabee celebrities from publicly-funded security is a deeply American decision. The UK’s monarchy is one of the wealthiest legacy institutions in the western world, and it would be absurd to imagine that it can’t afford to hire private security for the ‘former’ royals, who are set to fully renounce their royal obligations at the end of the month.
Trending on BLP
Big League Wellness3 days ago
POLL: 95% of Americans Support Coronavirus Travel Bans, Trump Approval Highest in Three Years
Tech2 days ago
National Center For Sexual Exploitation: Snapchat and Teen Vogue are Telling Kids to Make Child Porn!
News3 days ago
America First Patriot Kris Kobach Believes Democrats are Using the Wuhan Virus Crisis to Push Socialism
News4 days ago
Epidemiologist Behind Famous Wuhan Virus Model Lowers Original Projection
News4 days ago
Georgia State Rep. Wants to Suspend Enforcement of Concealed Carry Laws During Chinese Virus Crisis
Campaign 20204 days ago
Joe Rogan Takes Joe Biden To Task: “Trump Will Eat Him Alive”
Big League Wellness3 days ago
FLASHBACK: NYC Health Commissioner Said Coronavirus Risk Was “Low” Last Month
States3 days ago
California Lets Convicted Murderers of Children and Pregnant Woman Out of Jail Amidst Coronavirus Panic