Connect with us

Campaign 2020

WATCH: Gillibrand Claims, Without Evidence, President Trump Demonizes Trans Kids

Gillibrand is already racing to the bottom.

Published

on

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), a 2020 presidential candidate, took an unwarranted and unproven jab at President Donald J. Trump Friday, claiming that he has somehow mistreated transgender children.

“When President Trump demonizes transgender children it breaks my heart,” she said, “because I know a transgender boy in my school community and we watched him cut his hair short, we watched him dye his hair blue, we watched him change his name, we watched him tell his parents he wanted to identify as a boy.”

To be perfectly clear, there is zero evidence that Trump has ever “demonized” any transgender child. Gillibrand made that up to pander to her audience.

Trending: Judge Amy Coney Barrett Recently Approved Democrat COVID-19 Lockdown Policies

“That young man is the exact person who should not be demonized by the President of the United States,” she continued. “That young man is a person who the President of the United States should protect. That young man is a vulnerable young adult. He needs our love, he needs our protection, he needs us to stand by him. And this President chooses to demonize him and any other transgender person by telling them what bathroom they can go in, when he looks at our service members who ware serving bravely, and sacrificing, and putting their lives on the line, telling them their service is not needed – a service he was unwilling to give – is an outrage.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In this pat of the faux outrage, Gillibrand continued to lie (surprise!) and totally took the speech off the rails. There is no federal law about bathroom access. That has been left to the states to decide, as it should be. The federal government has no business regulating where people do their business.

As for the the dig at Trump’s lack of military service, this reporter doesn’t remember Gillibrand suiting up in camouflage and fighting any wars for corporate America. Chalk that up to female privilege.

“So that’s one of the reasons I’m running against President Trump,” she finished. “I’m so angry that he has divided this country, demonized so many people, divided us on every racial line, religious line, socioeconomic line, harming the fabric of our soul. He’s literally tearing the fabric of this country.”

Why do I get the feeling that the upcoming Democratic Primary race is going to involve each candidate trying to prove that he or she is more hysterical than the last?


Follow Peter D’Abrosca on Twitter: @pdabrosca

Like Peter D’Abrosca on Facebook: facebook.com/peterdabrosca

Campaign 2020

WATCH: Lois Frankel is Exposed for Fomenting Black Lives Matter Terror in New Pro-Laura Loomer Ad

The American Liberty Fund created the campaign ad.

Published

on

A new powerful advertisement released by a pro-liberty super PAC is making a strong case that Rep. Lois Frankel (D-FL) is fomenting the black lives terror movement and excusing their destructive actions in West Palm Beach.

The campaign ad released by the American Liberty Fund calls the Democrats “the party of violence” because of their embrace of extremism in recent years due to their intense hatred of President Donald Trump.

“As our law enforcement officers are gunned down, Lois Frankel and her Democrat Party sit back and literally cheer them on,” the advertisement stated.

“After a night of riots, Lois Frankel literally thanked the violent protesters. Lois Frankel isn’t on your side. Frankel is on the side of an extremist group that wants to de-fund our police,” it continued.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The ad went on to state that Frankel’s opponent – banned journalist turned GOP rising star Laura Loomer – would support law and order if she defeats Frankel in the race for Florida’s 21st U.S. House district.

“Laura Loomer is running for Congress, and she puts the safety of our community first. She will work with law enforcement to keep them funded and responsive to protect the lives of Floridians. On November 3rd, vote to stand with our police. Vote for Laura Loomer for Congress,” the advertisement concluded.

The entire video can be seen here:

Loomer’s trailblazing campaign strategy is having a great deal of success, as she raises an incredible amount of funds while breaking through the widespread censorship that got her booted from every major social media platform.

Big League Politics has reported on Loomer’s fight against Big Tech tyranny as her lawsuits against the Silicon Valley monopolists continue in the courts:

Banished journalist and Florida U.S. House candidate Laura Loomer’s lawsuit against Big Tech will be heard in the court of law following an order in the D.C. Circuit on Thursday.

Loomer is accusing tech giants such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter of conspiring to suppress conservative voices on their platforms. The lawsuit is challenging these monolithic corporations for allegedly violating antitrust law as well as the 1st Amendment of the Constitution.

Her lawsuit had been previously tossed out by U.S. District Judge Trever N. McFadden, a Trump appointee to the bench, who stated that “while selective censorship of the kind alleged by the plaintiffs may be antithetical to the American tradition of freedom of speech, it is not actionable under the First Amendment unless perpetrated by a state actor.” However, Loomer was able to use a recent court ruling to resurrect her lawsuit despite the initial setback.

Loomer’s legal team, led by the right-wing political interest group Freedom Watch, used the precedent of Packingham v. North Carolina, a ruling which determined that it was unconstitutional to ban sex offenders from social media. The case essentially set the precedent that social media is a 1st Amendment right.

“Many of the principles set forth by the Supreme Court in Packingham lead to what appellants believe is the natural progression of the law to hold that social media companies are liable for First Amendment violations, given the progression of technology and its infiltration into the daily lives of nearly every single person,” Loomer’s team said in their final brief presented to the court.

Loomer points to Twitter banning her from the platform at the end of 2018 after she said that Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) adheres to a religion in which “women are abused” and “forced to wear the hijab.” She was similarly banned from Instagram for her assertion that Islam is “a cancer on humanity,” and Facebook, which owns Instagram, quickly followed suit and banned her even though the offending post was not made on that platform.

Loomer still cannot get her accounts restored despite the fact that she is running for the U.S. House in Florida’s 21st Congressional District, which could be considered a form of electoral interference.

Loomer intends to capitalize on the Democrat Party’s descent into radicalism and embrace of anti-American terror to go to Congress.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending