Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

DC Whispers

Wikileaks Published SAME Number of Emails That Seth Rich Reportedly Gave Them



Slain Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich reportedly provided Wikileaks the exact same number of DNC emails that Wikileaks ended up publishing in its historic July 2016 release.

Fox 5 DC’s original report naming Rich as the Wikileaks source reported that Rich handed over “more than 44,000 emails” to Wikileaks.

Now, on its index page for the DNC emails, Wikileaks includes a note at the top stating that the group published exactly 44,053 emails. Wikileaks states (emphasis added):

“Starting on Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks released over 2 publications 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee — part one of our new Hillary Leaks series. The leaks come from the accounts of seven key figures in the DNC…”

Trending: DOCUMENT: Peter Strzok Was CIA And FBI At The Same Time, Say Experts

Seth Rich’s role as the Wikileaks source proves that the Russians did not hack the DNC. That false claim has provided the basis for the entire “Russian collusion” narrative that senators and the mainstream media have been pushing for months.

Wikileaks, which has a policy of not outing sources — alive or dead — is sending strong signals regarding Seth Rich.

Seth Rich, Facebook

Big League Politics Senior Reporter Cassandra Fairbanks reported that Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh said in an audiotaped conversation that Rich was the Wikileaks source. Hersh said that Rich leaked “juicy” DNC emails to Wikileaks, according to an FBI document that Hersh saw. That audiotape has been widely disseminated in alternative media, but the Mainstream Media is blacking out any coverage of the tape.

Wikileaks tweeted out the tape following publication of our report.

Wikileaks also tweeted out a video of Seymour Hersh with deceased Wikileaks operative Gavin Macfayden, who reportedly coordinated Rich’s leak of the DNC emails.

Malia Zimmerman’s article — which was pulled off the website with no clear reasoning — identified Rich as Wikileaks’ source, citing a federal investigator who reviewed an FBI forensic report. Zimmerman reported that the FBI dropped the case, despite holding evidence showing that Rich leaked the emails.



Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

DC Whispers

Prominent GOP Attorney Says Jim Jordan Accuser Admitted He Was ‘Hoping’ to Get Money



A prominent GOP attorney wrote a long defense of Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) on her personal Facebook page yesterday, in which she claimed that one of Jordan’s accusers has admitted to making his accusations on false pretenses.

Cleta Mitchell wrote the following:

“My friend Rep Jim Jordan is under attack by some very disreputable sources. To suggest that Rep Jordan would turn a blind eye to any injustice, wrongdoing, immoral or illegal act is absolutely laughable. Anyone who has known and worked with Jim Jordan, as I have, for nearly a decade knows that Rep Jordan never shies from a fight and that he leads the charge whenever there is a hint of something wrong – even to his own political detriment where others prefer that he remain silent, as they do. He never does.

The question I ask is why are these spurious allegations from disreputable sources being fomented against him now? Who is really behind this? It appears to me to be a concerted effort to smear one of the most honorable gentlemen ever to have served in the US House of Representatives. That is what NBC and other news outlets should be investigating…who is behind this? Can it be sources close to those in the Mueller investigation and the Department of Justice who are uncomfortable with Rep Jordan’s relentless pursuit of the truth behind what they have been doing for the past two years? That is much more likely than that these bizarre accusations are based in any facts whatsoever. We know Jim Jordan. We are only now learning about his accusers and there is something smelly about this entire episode. And yesterday, one of Jordan’s accusers admitted that they were “hoping” to get money … that’s a federal crime. Will the FBI arrest them?”

Mitchell did not specify which accuser was hoping to use the scandal for financial gain, but she is a GOP legal insider.

She confirmed her statement for Big League Politics but did not provide further details at this time.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×

Thanks for sharing!

We invite you to become a Big League Politics insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend