Connect with us

News

YouTube is Censoring Comments in Order to Protect the Chinese Communist Party’s Image

Published

on

According to a report from The Verge, YouTube is deleting comments that feature specific Chinese-language phrases connected to criticism of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The company claims that these deletions were errors and is attempting to rectify the issue.

“Upon review by our teams, we have confirmed this was an error in our enforcement systems and we are working to fix it as quickly as possible,” stated a YouTube spokesperson. The company did not go into details on how or why this error developed, but defended itself by asserting that the change was not the result of any change in its moderation policy.

However, James Vincent of The Verge highlighted some uncomfortable facts:

Trending: Deranged Democrat Demands Prosecution of 40,000 Trump Supporters Who Were OUTSIDE Capitol

But if the deletions are the result of a simple mistake, then it’s one that’s gone unnoticed for six months. The Verge found evidence that comments were being deleted as early as October 2019, when the issue was raised on YouTube’s official help pages and multiple users confirmed that they had experienced the same problem.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Comments left during videos or live streams that feature the words “共匪” (“communist bandit”) or “五毛” (“50-cent party”) are instantly deleted around 15 seconds. However, the English language translations and Romanized Pinyin equivalents are not deleted.

The term “共匪” refers to an insult that goes back to China’s Nationalist government, whereas “五毛,” (or “wu mao”) is a vulgar slang term for internet users paid to divert criticism of the CCP in online discussions. The name comes from allegations that such commenters are receiving 50 Chinese cents per post.

These phrases appear to have been added by accident to YouTube’s comment filters, which automatically delete spam and offensive texts. Vincent noted that “The comments are removed too quickly for human moderation and are deleted even if the banned phrases are used positively (e.g., “The 五毛 are doing a fantastic job”). YouTube says it’s been relying more on its automated filters in recent months due changes to its workforce brought about by the pandemic.”

This incident of accidental censorship gets more confusing when taking into account that YouTube, as Vincent calls attention to, “is currently blocked in China, giving its parent company, Google, even less reason to censor comments critical of the CCP or apply moderation systems in accordance with Chinese censorship laws.”

US technologist and former Oculus founder Palmer Luckey brought attention to these automatic deletions in a Twitter post on May 26, 2020. However, human rights activist Jennifer Zeng spotted similar cases in the middle of the May. According to Vincent, “The Verge also found complaints on YouTube’s official help pages dated to October 2019.”

Google has received frequent criticism for  kowtowing to the CCP’s call for censorship. The tech titan attempted to set up a prototype search engine known as Project Dragonfly which complied with Chinese Communist Party censorship. That said, the project was never implemented and is part of the company’s relentless efforts to tap into the Chinese market.

When news of Dragonfly surfaced in 2018 in a report on The Intercept, Google politicians and its own employees took it to task for compromising its principles. In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing back in June 2019, the company stated it had “terminated” the project and that it had “no plans to launch Search in China.”

Given Big Tech’s globalist propensities and its desire to earn a quick buck, consequences be damned, its coddling of China illustrates its anti-nationalist outlook.

Lawmakers and journalists should continue placing the company under further scrutiny for its behavior.

 

Campaign 2020

The American Right Should Beware of Campaign Consultant Grifters

Some people want to make a quick buck with zero results to show for it.

Published

on

Heading into 2022 and 2024, America First operatives should be careful dealing with campaigns run by grifters. 

Patrick Clerbune of VDARE put out an informative post that serves as a warning to all about the rampant corruption within Republican political consultant outfits. 

He highlighted a Washington Post piece detailing how donors gave more than $8 million to Kim Klacik, a black woman running as a Republican candidate in Maryland’s 7th district. In reality, the money donated to Klacik’s campaign went straight to the fat pockets of political consultants who knew full well that she couldn’t win.

The Post went into further detail about this naked grifting opportunity:

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Her campaign is an example of how some consulting firms are profiting handsomely from Republican candidates who have robust appeal in today’s politically charged environment…

By the end of Klacik’s campaign, she would raise a staggering $8.3 million and pay nearly $3.7 million of it to Olympic Media, according to campaign finance filings.

For political veterans, this is nothing new under the sun. Political consultant parasites such as Karl Rove are notorious for enriching themselves by running failed campaigns and diverting resources from actual winnable races. Rove was also involved in the Georgia Senate dumpster fire, where the GOP dropped a whopping $1 billion and still ended up losing both seats. 

Pointing out how the managerial state is detrimental to all Americans, especially minorities, is one thing. But using failed ethnic pandering and running campaigns in districts that can never be won by Republicans is another. 

In the aforementioned case, Maryland’s 7th district has never gone Republican in its history and was the long-time home of Elijah Cummings from 1996 until his death in 2019. Democrat challenger Kweisi Mfume completely obliterated Klacik 74 to 25 in the 2020 general election. 

Intelligent nationalists would be wise to recognize that certain races are lost causes, which drain resources that could otherwise be allocated towards winnable campaigns. A large degree of skepticism should always be directed towards the political consultant class. Their money-making model does not always translate into electoral success.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending