ZeroHedge BANNED From Twitter After Posting Findings of ‘HIV’ Insertions in Coronavirus, Bioweapon Possibility
Big Tech entities are desperately trying to suppress news that the Chinese coronavirus has “HIV” insertions which indicate it is a potential bioweapon.
The free speech warriors at Gab.com pointed out that Zerohedge was removed from Twitter shortly after they posted the report from their account.
The Zerohedge report noted that researchers from India came to the conclusion about the virus after studying its genome.
“To our surprise, these sequence insertions were not only absent in S protein of SARS but were also not observed in any other member of the Coronaviridae family (Supplementary figure). This is startling as it is quite unlikely for a virus to have acquired such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time,” the Indian scientists determined.
Public health scientist Dr. Eric Fiegl-Dong noted the seriousness of the findings by the Indian researchers in a Twitter post.
This startling news fits it line what Big League Politics reported last week about the possible outbreak coming from a research facility for dangerous pathogens in Wuhan, China.
The Wuhan laboratory was opened in 2017 amidst controversy that it could cause the spread of deadly disease:
A laboratory in Wuhan is on the cusp of being cleared to work with the world’s most dangerous pathogens. The move is part of a plan to build between five and seven biosafety level-4 (BSL-4) labs across the Chinese mainland by 2025, and has generated much excitement, as well as some concerns.
Some scientists outside China worry about pathogens escaping, and the addition of a biological dimension to geopolitical tensions between China and other nations. But Chinese microbiologists are celebrating their entrance to the elite cadre empowered to wrestle with the world’s greatest biological threats.
“It will offer more opportunities for Chinese researchers, and our contribution on the BSL‑4-level pathogens will benefit the world,” says George Gao, director of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology in Beijing. There are already two BSL-4 labs in Taiwan, but the National Bio-safety Laboratory, Wuhan, would be the first on the Chinese mainland…
Many staff from the Wuhan lab have been training at a BSL-4 lab in Lyon, which some scientists find reassuring. And the facility has already carried out a test-run using a low-risk virus.
But worries surround the Chinese lab, too. The SARS virus has escaped from high-level containment facilities in Beijing multiple times, notes Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. Tim Trevan, founder of CHROME Biosafety and Biosecurity Consulting in Damascus, Maryland, says that an open culture is important to keeping BSL-4 labs safe, and he questions how easy this will be in China, where society emphasizes hierarchy. “Diversity of viewpoint, flat structures where everyone feels free to speak up and openness of information are important,” he says.
Yuan says that he has worked to address this issue with staff. “We tell them the most important thing is that they report what they have or haven’t done,” he says. And the lab’s international collaborations will increase openness. “Transparency is the basis of the lab,” he adds.
Big Tech is desperate to suppress this information that could be crucial in understanding the origin of the coronavirus pandemic that has the world in a panic.