Brookings Institute/Flickr/Creative commons http://bit.ly/2rcrabI
The House Intelligence Committee has issued subpoenas for information regarding unmasking requests made by former national security adviser Susan Rice, former CIA Director John Brennan and former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power.
The subpoenas were sent to the National Security Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Central Intelligence Agency requesting information about how and why intelligence community intercepts of those close to the Donald Trump campaign were unmasked and ultimately leaked to the press.
Normally, the identities of US citizens who are not the targets, but sometimes get caught in the government spying, are redacted to protect their privacy. The process of “unmasking” the identities of people whose conversations were intercepted can only be requested by a select few within the intelligence community.
In March, White House lawyers learned that Rice was behind unmasking names of people within the Trump team, such as General Mike Flynn, whose conversation with a Russian ambassador was later leaked to the media.
Appearing on “PBS NewsHour” in March, Rice was asked about Trump and his team being caught up in incidental intelligence collection, and she denied having any knowledge of it happening.
“I know nothing about this,” Rice said. “I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that account today.”
After it was revealed that she was personally behind the unmasking of Flynn, Rice claimed in an interview with MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell that the Obama administration did not abuse intelligence surveillance for political purposes.
“The allegation is that somehow, Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes,” Rice asserted. “That’s absolutely false. Let me explain how this works. I was the national security adviser. My job is to protect the American people and the security of our country. That’s the same as the secretary of state, the secretary of defense, the CIA director.”
Rice also denied being behind the leaking of unmasked phone conversations to the media. The former national security advisor is married to ABC News Executive Producer Ian Cameron.
“I leaked nothing to nobody,” Rice said, laughing, “and never have and never would.”
Following the interview, White House Director of Social Media Dan Scavino tweeted, “lyin’, leakin’ Susan Rice stammered through her soft ball interview with Dem PR person Andrea Mitchell.”
In May, Rice rejected an invitation to testify before the Senate committee on Russian interference — which Trump referred to as “not good!”
“Susan Rice, the former National Security Advisor to President Obama, is refusing to testify before a Senate subcommittee next week on allegations of unmasking Trump transition officials. Not good!” Trump tweeted.
Rice, Power, and Brennan were not personally subpoenaed by the committee.
View Comments
Someone needs to grow a pair and get this party going. This glacial pace sucks.
I'm pretty sure I know how this will play out. They will all claim they were legitimately concerned about the Russians and apparent collusion with the Trump campaign, based on what they happened to stumble across while routinely monitoring foreign communications. They were so concerned about the potential grave threat to the nations security, that they felt it imperative that the names of US citizens be unmasked. Conveniently, and purely coincidentally, Obama and Lynch decided this was a great time to allow dissemination of intelligence data on a mass scale between intelligence agencies, just as they were both about to leave office. Unfortunately, one of the many members of the intelligence community let the names slip to the MSM, which was definitely not the intention of such an intelligence sharing order.
In response to the sad excuse for corrupt and dangerous behaviour, outraged congressional leaders will chastise them in typical toothless fashion for their poor judgment, and life will go on for all.
Who's on Dancing With The Stars this week??