Connect with us

Culture

White Coat Waste fights taxpayer-funded animal testing

Published

on

When one thinks of animal rights activism they generally think of extremist groups on the left, but a new group is taking the lead from the right in the fight against taxpayer-funded animal experimentation.

The organization, White Coat Waste Project, pride themselves on being both dog lovers and liberty lovers. Their goal, according to their website, is to “STOP taxpayer-funded experiments on dogs, monkeys, cats and other animals, we must stop wasteful government spending. Our approach? Drain the swamp: cut federal spending that hurts animals and Americans.”

The organization points out that the vast majority of “wasteful, duplicative, and cruel animal experiments are paid for with taxpayers’ money — and without taxpayers’ approval.” They also note that the problem is so massive that nobody really knows how much money our government is spending on this form of testing — or how many animals are used and killed since there is nearly no transparency regarding these programs.

Trending: COVER-UP: Whitmer Admin Says ‘Records Do Not Exist’ Pertaining to $25 Million Dominion Contract Set Up by Democrat Official

To solve the problem, White Coat Waste hopes to shine a bright light on the more than $15 billion that goes into these studies each year and pressure the government to defund the wasteful projects — which would save the animals.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The White Coat Waste Project’s team of seasoned issue advocates, scientists, doctors and political strategists combines grassroots tactics, media campaigns, diverse coalitions, open records laws and lobbying to shake up how and how much government spends on wasteful animal experiments. We’re the only group focused on bringing together waste hawks, science advocates, animal-lovers and liberty-lovers to cut spending that hurts animals,” the organization’s website reads.

On their website, the watchdog group outlines some of the absolutely absurd and needlessly cruel experiments that our government has funded. The disheartening list includes stuffing hamsters with pizza and wine grapes to “increase the commercial value of the grapes and other specialty crops,” spending $10 million to address “lab mouse gender inequality,” and spending $2.9 million to force monkeys to run on treadmills for a quarter-mile a day — for a study which was already also being tested on human volunteers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj6Qb4C1u-Q

Retired Marine Staff Sgt. Johnny “Joey” Jones, a Fox News analyst, told Big League Politics he is working with the organization to stop animal testing at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

In an op-ed for Fox News, Jones wrote: “I’m suspicious of researchers at the Department of Veterans Affairs, an organization tasked with caring for me as a combat-disabled veteran, who view dogs merely as disposable furry test tubes, not loyal companions. This is hard for me to understand, because I worked alongside life-saving bomb-sniffing dogs in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

Jones said the program was very unsetting.

“It’s especially shameful that VA is defending spending millions of tax dollars to buy and cut up dogs for its dubious research but refuses to provide service dogs to support veterans suffering from the devastating effects of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and who are committing suicide at alarming rates,” the Marine wrote.

The VA and some groups have argued that the public should look at the dog research through the eyes of a disabled veteran — and that he would happily provide his perspective, he wrote

“So here it is: As a combat wounded Marine who’s given both legs for an idea of security and a pursuit of happiness – and as a human being who’s experienced the horrific suffering of war — I believe our government can and should do better for veterans, taxpayers and dogs,” he wrote.

The VA is currently the only agency conducting “maximum pain” experiments in which significant pain is inflicted on dogs and left unrelieved.” Only three of their facilities are still engaging in this form of experimentation.

Current experiments, according to White Coat Waste, include giving six-month-old hound puppies heart attacks, drilling into beagles’ skulls, and severing “friendly” dogs’ spinal cords.

Jones, who lost both his legs above the knee after stepping on an IED while heroically clearing a minefield in Afghanistan, explained that White Coat Waste is starting with the VA because the private sector has moved past animal testing.

“It’s a conservative principled animal rights activist effort. We’re working to get legislation passed that prohibits the government from funding this type of testing (starting with VA) because the private sector has already moved passed it,” Jones told Big League. “Rather than attacking the idea of animal testing, we’re saying it a waste of taxpayer money because there have been zero major scientific breakthroughs as a direct result of schedule E testing in 30 years.”

Jones explained that the people who are involved with and support their organization are dog lovers — which is why trying to defund the testing at the VA is their top priority. The majority of schedule E — maximum pain and pain without relief — occurs at the VA labs.

He’s not alone.

VetsFirst, The American Military Retirees Association and The Retired Enlisted Association have all come out in support of ending painful testing on dogs and moving the funds to programs that will actually help veterans.

Earlier this month, the groups penned a letter to Rep. Dina Titus (D.-Nev.) and Rep. Dave Brat (R.-Va.) in support of their efforts to stop the experimentation. Over the summer, they passed legislation to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from funding medical experiments on dogs that cause significant pain or harm.

“We are concerned by the apparent lack of evidence that the VA’s past and ongoing canine research—particularly projects involving causing dogs pain and distress, some of which is not relieved—has led to effective and accessible treatments or cures for veteran-specific illnesses,” the letter from the veteran’s groups read. “Further, any medical conclusions borne from VA research should be allowed to benefit veterans for purposes of obtaining service-connected presumptive injuries and illnesses. As such, we support your efforts to eliminate unnecessary VA canine research that is not serving the specific needs of all veterans so that these resources can be more appropriately allocated.”

Titus, Brat and Republican Florida Rep. Brian Mast also helped to introduce the PUPPERS Act, which would “prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from conducting medical research causing significant pain or distress to dogs” permanently.

“The VA’s first priority should be caring for our veterans, not harming man’s best friend,” Brat said of the dog experimentation programs in a press release.

POTUS’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump is a huge backer of the cause. In July, the long-time dog rescuer and advocate met with Brat to discuss the bipartisan bill and lend her support.

The majority of veterans also want to stop the wasteful spending on the cruel tests. In a national survey conducted in September by the research firm PulsePoint, 56% of veterans and their immediate family members responded that they support legislation to end it.

 

Last week, the White Coat Waste Project released a new television ad urging people to contact Congress and ask them to support the legislation that would permanently end the experimentation.

More information about how to get involved with the group can be found at the Prisoners of Waste website.

Snowflakes

Left-wing Snowflakes Working for Publisher Attempt Censorship Revolt Over New Jordan Peterson Book

They really hate freedom of expression.

Published

on

Shortly after news broke that individualist author Jordan Peterson would be releasing a new book, far-left staffers at the book’s publisher, Penguin Random House Canada, are attempting a revolt to get the book censored.

VICE has reported on certain staff members throwing tantrums during a recent townhall over Penguin Random House’s intended publication of Peterson’s new book, Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life. The book is scheduled to be released in March 2021.

“He is an icon of hate speech and transphobia and the fact that he’s an icon of white supremacy, regardless of the content of his book, I’m not proud to work for a company that publishes him,” a LGBT pervert who wants Peterson’s book to be censored said to VICE World News.

Another weakling employee said that “people were crying in the meeting about how Jordan Peterson has affected their lives.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The company since June has been doing all these anti-racist and allyship things and them publishing Peterson’s book completely goes against this. It just makes all of their previous efforts seem completely performative,” the employee said.

The publisher is apparently not folding to the snowflakes and will continue with their plans to publish the book despite their whininess.

“We announced yesterday that we will publish Jordan Peterson’s new book Beyond Order this coming March. Immediately following the announcement, we held a forum and provided a space for our employees to express their views and offer feedback. Our employees have started an anonymous feedback channel, which we fully support. We are open to hearing our employees’ feedback and answering all of their questions. We remain committed to publishing a range of voices and viewpoints,” the statement said.

Big League Politics has reported on how companies are beginning to ignore their left-wing employees and instead make decisions based on market demands:

A contingent of leftist snowflakes working at Spotify are demanding that certain podcast episodes of the Joe Rogan Experience be censored to their ideological demands, or they will strike.

Last week, it was reported that Spotify was undergoing a revolt of sorts because several controversial episodes of the podcast were being published on the platform. An episode featuring Abigail Shrier, author of Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, is particularly offensive to the left-wing snowflakes who hate freedom of speech and love mentally-ill individuals getting their genitals mutilated.

Rogan is already being forced to grovel for making accurate statements on his podcast, such as when he correctly claimed that left-wing terrorists are starting wildfires in places like Portland.

“I said something on the podcast with Douglas Murray about people getting arrested for lighting fires, and I got duped. It’s wrong,” Rogan said in an Instagram post.

Smelling blood in the water, the Spotify leftists are going for the jugular. They are threatening to strike if they cannot exert further ideological control over Rogan’s podcast. According to Digital Music News, New York-based Spotify employees are intending to strike with accompanying pro-censorship protests outside of Spotify’s Manhattan headquarters.

However, they report that Spotify brass is likely willing to stare down these entitled employees, considering the $100 million investment they put into Rogan’s podcast.

“It also appears that Spotify management — including CEO Daniel Ek — has a limited tolerance for the mutiny on deck… The reason for Ek’s pushback is somewhat obvious. Joe Rogan’s entire identity revolves around unfiltered discussion and opinion, and audiences could abandon the podcast if it becomes censored or controlled,” Digital Music News reported.

Companies are beginning to realize that “get woke, go broke” is a truism and adjusting accordingly by ignoring liberal tantrums.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending