Connect with us

Tech

Android Co-Founder, Paid $90 Million by Google After Sex Assault Claims, is Accused of Running Lurid ‘Sex Ring’

Andy Rubin claimed to ‘own’ his female victims and would ‘share’ them with colleagues, according to his wife.

Published

on

Andy Rubin, a multi-millionaire former Google Executive who co-founded Android, is being accused of running an illicit “sex ring” where he paid extravagant amounts for his mistresses to be involved in threesomes and other lurid sex acts.

The claims have come to light as apart of a divorce proceeding with his soon-to-be ex-wife, Rie Hirabaru Rubin, who is accusing him of hiding millions of dollars from her so he could use it to fund his seedy endeavors.

Rie Rubin is hoping to invalidate a pre-nuptual agreement that she signed before their 2009 marriage, based on the claims that she was lied to repeatedly by her husband who led this double life.

Trending: Twitter Suspends US Customs and Border Protection Commissioner For Celebrating the Effectiveness of Trump’s Border Wall

Adding to the possible veracity of her claims is the circumstances behind Rubin’s departure from Google. After he was accused of sexual misconduct in 2014, Google paid him $90 million dollars to leave – essentially providing a monetary incentive of sorts for abuse. This sparked outrage internally within Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent corporation. It even sparked protests in the streets.

Rubin left Google after a fellow employee accused him of forcing her to give him oral sex in a hotel room in 2013. He was still receiving payments from Google as of late 2018.

“We’re encouraged because the court’s tentative order permits the case to go forward,” said Brian Danitz, a lawyer for Rie Rubin. “Still, we’re disappointed the allegations regarding Andy Rubin’s relationships in exchange for payment has been stricken from the complaint.”

The original complaint alleged that Rubin had “affairs with multiple women.” A woman was allegedly “complicit with Rubin in running what appeared to be a sex ring” which involved him creating “‘ownership’ relationships with other women, whereby Rubin would pay for their expenses in exchange for offering them to other men.”

Rubin’s attorney Ellen Stross claims that the complaint filed by his soon-to-be ex-wife is “full of false allegations.”

“This is a garden variety family law dispute involving a wife who regrets her decision to execute a prenuptial agreement,” Stross said in a statement.

Rubin denies any culpability for anything, from the sexual assault allegations while at Google to his ex-wife’s claims of deceit and sexual impropriety. Despite his denials, the case may serve as a window into the morals and values of a depraved Silicon Valley elite that aims to become the arbiter of permissible thought for the entire world.

Tech

BANNED BY GOOGLE: #DetroitLeaks Video Showing Evidence of Electoral Fraud is Removed From Youtube

The video had received tens of thousands of views.

Published

on

A video detailing the explosive evidence of election trainers in the city of Detroit telling poll workers how to lie to voters, destroy ballots, and disenfranchise poll challengers on election day has been removed from YouTube.

YouTube, the Google-owned monopoly video platform, issued a notice to the Detroit Leaks channel claiming that the video was pulled because it violated their terms of service with regards to spam, deceptive practices and scams. This is the channel’s first strike on the platform. Continued violations could result in the removal of the page permanently.

“Content that contains spam, scams, and other deceptive practices that take advantage of the community are not allowed on YouTube. This includes titles, thumbnails, or descriptions that promises users something in the video but actually directs them on to another site,” Google wrote in their notice about the censoring of the #DetroitLeaks video.

The Detroit Leaks page has appealed the decision made by YouTube and are demanding the immediate reinstatement of the video on the platform.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The video is accurately presented and described. Please reverse this capricious censorship that could also be considered a form of electoral interference. Thanks,” the page wrote in their appeal to Google.

The violation was sent on the night of Thursday, Oct. 29, as Google’s electoral interference schemes kick into high gear:

The video can now be accessed on BitChute here.

Big League Politics reported earlier in the week on how the #DetroitLeaks revelations have resulted in the reaffirmation of the rights of poll challengers in the Michigan courts:

One day after vowing to fight a crucial voter integrity lawsuit in the courts, the Michigan attorney general’s office has conceded to demands that plaintiffs believe will clarify the role of poll challengers in the state.

The case was heard in the Michigan Court of Claims, which springs from shocking #DetroitLeaks revelations that show election workers cackling as their instructor explains how they will be able to use COVID-19 social distancing rules to disenfranchise poll challengers.

Attorneys Philip Ellison and Matt Gronda appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs, state representative candidate Stephen Carra and electoral integrity watchdog Bob Cushman. Assistant attorney general Erik Grill attended on behalf of Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel.

“At this point, your honor, I am happy to report that the parties and the attorneys have been working very diligently this morning to try and reach a resolution, and I’m happy to report that we have,” Gronda said.

He explained that the secretary of state’s office will be sending out an explicit notice before Oct. 29 at 5pm that makes clear the rights of poll challengers and watchers.

Gronda said that the new directive would be approximate to this: “Challengers and poll watchers have certain rights and responsibilities established by Michigan election law. Challengers and poll watchers are required to wear masks that cover the nose and mouth to the extent medically able to do so consistent with the MDHHS order and maintain social distancing while not performing their legal duties.”

“Challengers and poll watchers should maintain at least six feet of distance between themselves and election workers and voters as reasonably possible. However, to the extent that it is necessary to temporarily stand in closer proximity to election workers, to have a challenge heard, to observe the poll book, or perform any other legal duty, challengers and poll watchers are permitted to do so, provided close personal interaction is as brief as possible,” the new directive continues.

“Once a challenge or necessary observation is complete, challengers and poll watchers should resume remaining six feet away from voters and poll workers,” the directive concludes. Gronda noted that the state would be entering into a binding written agreement with the plaintiffs.

The #DetroitLeaks revelations have prompted many Michigan patriots to insert themselves in the process to stop fraud by becoming poll challengers. Poll challengers are needed throughout the country, and more information can be found at DefendYourBallot.com about how to become a poll challenger in your state.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending