On July 31st, The Independent reported that President Trump is considering withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. The leftist UK publication presented the story as bad news – as though Trump was defying his top military advisors.
The military officers who serve the President chose to serve him voluntarily, understanding that his position on war is not nearly as hawkish as those of his establishment Democrat and Republican predecessors, some who have profited off of the very wars that we’re still fighting. Looking at you, Dick Cheney.
President Trump campaigned on utterly destroying ISIS, and a foreign policy that he described as “peace through strength.” He was openly adversarial regarding the invasion of Iraq during his campaign, and questioned whether or not our taxpayer dollars could be spent more effectively in other areas besides endless conflicts in the Middle East.
“It’s not like we had victory. It’s a mess. The middle east is totally destabilized – a total and complete mess. I wish we had the $4 trillion dollars or $5 trillion dollars; I wish it were spent right here in the United States on our schools, hospitals, roads, airports, and everything else that are all falling apart,” he said during a debate on CNN.
His campaign message was a popular one among war-weary Americans, particularly those who are currently serving in the military. The Military Times reported in late 2016 that in a poll of 2200 active duty troops, 55% “strongly oppose” or “somewhat oppose” nation-building activities, defined as “establishing democracies in the Middle East and North Africa.” In a similar exercise, CNN, in collaboration with ORC International, a polling company, found in 2013 that 64% of Americans were “very reluctant” to use military force around the world.
So with President Trump mulling over the removal of the troops from Afghanistan – potentially ending the longest war in U.S. history – one might think that mainstream media would be supportive of the measure. Instead, we have deafening silence. It’s almost as though they have an anti-Trump agenda to protect! The American people want this. They want peace in the Middle East. They recognize the futility of putting boots on the ground to fight an enemy that continues to regenerate itself after 16 years of nonstop fighting.
The same goes for the recent announcement of the end of the United States’ covert arming of “moderate” Syrian rebels who were seeking to overthrow the Syrian president, Bashar Al-Assad. It’s the same tactic that our government has used to topple other regimes in the Middle East, including the Gaddafi regime in Libya.
It is well-known that the “moderate” rebels that we’ve been supporting are not moderate at all. In fact, they’re not even rebels. Rather, they’re radical terrorists.
Professor Joshua Landis, the director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma, points out that “every rebel group in Syria has been affiliated with Al Qaeda at some point.” Historically, the “rebel” groups in the Middle East are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, and Al Qaeda. Often they go by different names – al-Nusra, Boko Haram, al-Shabab – but they’re not inherently different. They’re one in the same. They fight for the same purpose of establishing an Islamic caliphate. They worship the same warped radical Islamic ideology. They behead, rape, and pillage in the name of Allah, no matter where they are located geographically, or what they call themselves.
Why would our elected representatives choose to arm these dubious groups in the first place, especially with taxpayer funding? It deserves intense public scrutiny. It is decidedly opposed to the idea that framers of our Constitution had in mind regarding how America would conduct itself in foreign affairs. The Jeffersonian crowd would be appalled. Our founders were true nationalists. They believed in America keeping to itself unless it was directly provoked. That has not been our policy in the Middle East for quite some time. It’s refreshing to see an administration that is genuinely interested in finishing the never-ending Middle Eastern quagmire.
Instead of hailing the new “dis-arm the rebels” policy that will save countless lives and help to prevent the spread of terror in the Middle East, the media has spun it as a victory for Vladimir Putin. The suggestion is that the President Trump is working on Russia’s behalf, as Putin is aligned with Assad. It’s a small amount of life-blood for their rapidly deteriorating Russian election influence conspiracy theory.
President Trump is insistent on destroying our enemies, rather than arming them. Victories against ISIS have been overwhelming under the Trump presidency.
In early July, Iraq’s Prime Minister declared victory against ISIS in a “liberated” Mosul. ISIS is quickly losing control of it’s headquarters in Syria, which is located in the city of Raqqa. They have been driven out of 40% of the city since June. The militants have not been able to leave or enter the city, and are subject to daily airstrikes from the U.S. Military.
Consider the significance of these events: ISIS stands for the “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Their goal is to set up a Muslim caliphate in the land that makes up the two nations, and now they are failing miserably. President Trump is delivering on his promise to defeat ISIS, while simultaneously de-escalating U.S. involvement in regime change and the long-fought War on Terror. This is the most significant positive development in Middle Eastern War on Terror since the death of Osama bin Laden. It is the true realization of the “peace through strength” tactic that President Trump campaigned on. We are showing strength by driving out ISIS through air raids, and promoting peace by discontinuing the flow of their weaponry so that they cannot continue to de-stabilize the nations in which they inhabit.
This should be celebrated. Instead, the stories of victory and the Trump’s push for peace in the Middle East has been largely ignored by the media. We should not expect that to change, and instead should focus on shining light on Trump administration wins.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
John Bolton Completes Turncoat Transformation, Slams Trump White House For Delaying Tell-All Book
Bolton’s book is subject to a national security review.
Former White House National Security Adviser John Bolton bemoaned a national security review of his upcoming tell-all book when speaking at Duke University on Monday.
Bolton isn’t pleased that his book, “The Room Where it Happened: A White House Memoir,” is being delayed while White House national security personnel thoroughly review it to ensure any and all classified information remains private. According to Bolton, the book’s been in review since December 30th, hardly a lengthy period of time to ensure that classified U.S intelligence isn’t released to the broader public.
According to Bolton, the process is censorship.
“I say things in the manuscript about what [Trump] said to me; I hope they become public someday. He tweets, but I can’t talk about it — how fair is that?”
Bolton was fired as National Security Adviser for consistently trying to undermine the President’s America First foreign policy vision, instead preferring a neoconservative approach of regime change, globalism, and wide-ranging foreign intervention.
He’s flirted strongly with anti-Trump resistance liberals since his ouster, falling out of the President’s good graces and drawing his ire in presidential tweets.
For a guy who couldn’t get approved for the Ambassador to the U.N. years ago, couldn’t get approved for anything since, “begged” me for a non Senate approved job, which I gave him despite many saying “Don’t do it, sir,” takes the job, mistakenly says “Libyan Model” on T.V., and..
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 29, 2020
This isn’t the first time that Bolton has claimed the White House are censoring him. He incorrectly believed the White House was blocking his access to his official Twitter account, when by all indications it simply appears he was unaware how to bypass the two-factor authentication needed to access Twitter from a new IP address after his firing.
It’s totally reasonable for Bolton’s profiteering book to be delayed for any and all considerations over classified information. The longtime neoconservative pundit will simply have to wait to cash in.
Trending on BLP
Violent Left3 days ago
New Mexico Bureaucrat Arrested for Vandalizing State GOP Headquarters
News3 days ago
MS-13 Thug Gets Life Sentence in Virginia for Rape and Abduction
The Swamp3 days ago
SWAMP: FBI Press Officer Accepted Baseball Tickets From CNN Reporter
Culture3 days ago
How Vulture Capitalists Use Their Ill-Gotten Gains to Push Transgenderism Onto Children
Politics2 days ago
More Americans Now Identify as Republicans Than They Do As Democrats
Border Security2 days ago
President Trump Debunks Fake News Claims of Border Wall Collapse
News3 days ago
North Dakota Group Wants to Recall County Commissioner for Trying to Flood the County with Third World Refugees
Fake News Media2 days ago
CNN Host Admits He Was “Snookered” By Avenatti After Felony Extortion Conviction
Campaign 20202 days ago
Bloomberg Takes Lead in New National Democratic Primary Poll
Sports2 days ago
WATCH: President Trump Kicks off Daytona 500 After Taking Lap In Presidential Limousine
The Swamp2 days ago
1,100 Liberal Prosecutors, Bureaucrats, Demand Bill Barr’s Resignation from DOJ
Deep State1 day ago
Alan Dershowitz: George Soros Personally Requested FBI Investigations During Obama Presidency