Connect with us

Big League National Security

Why Aren’t We Celebrating Trump’s Middle East Wins?



On July 31st, The Independent reported that President Trump is considering withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. The leftist UK publication presented the story as bad news – as though Trump was defying his top military advisors.

He’s not.

The military officers who serve the President chose to serve him voluntarily, understanding that his position on war is not nearly as hawkish as those of his establishment Democrat and Republican predecessors, some who have profited off of the very wars that we’re still fighting. Looking at you, Dick Cheney.

Trending: Mike Lee Passes Big Tech H-1B Visa Giveaway in Senate Without Objection

President Trump campaigned on utterly destroying ISIS, and a foreign policy that he described as “peace through strength.” He was openly adversarial regarding the invasion of Iraq during his campaign, and questioned whether or not our taxpayer dollars could be spent more effectively in other areas besides endless conflicts in the Middle East.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“It’s not like we had victory. It’s a mess. The middle east is totally destabilized – a total and complete mess. I wish we had the $4 trillion dollars or $5 trillion dollars; I wish it were spent right here in the United States on our schools, hospitals, roads, airports, and everything else that are all falling apart,” he said during a debate on CNN.

His campaign message was a popular one among war-weary Americans, particularly those who are currently serving in the military. The Military Times reported in late 2016 that in a poll of 2200 active duty troops, 55% “strongly oppose” or “somewhat oppose” nation-building activities, defined as “establishing democracies in the Middle East and North Africa.” In a similar exercise, CNN, in collaboration with ORC International, a polling company, found in 2013 that 64% of Americans were “very reluctant” to use military force around the world.

So with President Trump mulling over the removal of the troops from Afghanistan – potentially ending the longest war in U.S. history – one might think that mainstream media would be supportive of the measure. Instead, we have deafening silence. It’s almost as though they have an anti-Trump agenda to protect! The American people want this. They want peace in the Middle East. They recognize the futility of putting boots on the ground to fight an enemy that continues to regenerate itself after 16 years of nonstop fighting.

The same goes for the recent announcement of the end of the United States’ covert arming of “moderate” Syrian rebels who were seeking to overthrow the Syrian president, Bashar Al-Assad. It’s the same tactic that our government has used to topple other regimes in the Middle East, including the Gaddafi regime in Libya.

It is well-known that the “moderate” rebels that we’ve been supporting are not moderate at all. In fact, they’re not even rebels. Rather, they’re radical terrorists.

Professor Joshua Landis, the director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma, points out that “every rebel group in Syria has been affiliated with Al Qaeda at some point.” Historically, the “rebel” groups in the Middle East are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, and Al Qaeda. Often they go by different names  – al-Nusra, Boko Haram, al-Shabab – but they’re not inherently different. They’re one in the same. They fight for the same purpose of establishing an Islamic caliphate. They worship the same warped radical Islamic ideology. They behead, rape, and pillage in the name of Allah, no matter where they are located geographically, or what they call themselves.

Why would our elected representatives choose to arm these dubious groups in the first place, especially with taxpayer funding?  It deserves intense public scrutiny. It is decidedly opposed to the idea that framers of our Constitution had in mind regarding how America would conduct itself in foreign affairs. The Jeffersonian crowd would be appalled. Our founders were true nationalists. They believed in America keeping to itself unless it was directly provoked. That has not been our policy in the Middle East for quite some time. It’s refreshing to see an administration that is genuinely interested in finishing the never-ending Middle Eastern quagmire.

Instead of hailing the new “dis-arm the rebels” policy that will save countless lives and help to prevent the spread of terror in the Middle East, the media has spun it as a victory for Vladimir Putin. The suggestion is that the President Trump is working on Russia’s behalf, as Putin is aligned with Assad. It’s a small amount of life-blood for their rapidly deteriorating Russian election influence conspiracy theory.

President Trump is insistent on destroying our enemies, rather than arming them. Victories against ISIS have been overwhelming under the Trump presidency.

In early July, Iraq’s Prime Minister declared victory against ISIS in a “liberated” Mosul. ISIS is quickly losing control of it’s headquarters in Syria, which is located in the city of Raqqa. They have been driven out of 40% of the city since June. The militants have not been able to leave or enter the city, and are subject to daily airstrikes from the U.S. Military.

Consider the significance of these events: ISIS stands for the “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Their goal is to set up a Muslim caliphate in the land that makes up the two nations, and now they are failing miserably. President Trump is delivering on his promise to defeat ISIS, while simultaneously de-escalating U.S. involvement in regime change and the long-fought War on Terror. This is the most significant positive development in Middle Eastern War on Terror since the death of Osama bin Laden. It is the true realization of the “peace through strength” tactic that President Trump campaigned on. We are showing strength by driving out ISIS through air raids, and promoting peace by discontinuing the flow of their weaponry so that they cannot continue to de-stabilize the nations in which they inhabit.

This should be celebrated. Instead, the stories of victory and the Trump’s push for peace in the Middle East has been largely ignored by the media. We should not expect that to change, and instead should focus on shining light on Trump administration wins.


ANTIFA-Linked Washington Women, Former Democrat Organizer Charged With Terrorist Attack in Train Derailment Plot

Two women are charged with attacks on railroad infrastructure.



Two ANTIFA-linked Bellingham, Washington women were federally charged on counts of terrorist attack and violence against a railroad carrier on Monday, with the Department of Justice alleging Ellen Reiche and Samantha Brooks placed a “shunt” on railroad tracks in Whatcom County.

The shunt device in question disrupts the low level electrical current on the tracks and can disable various safety features. Charging documents indicate that previous shunting incidents had caused dangerous situations for traveling trains and almost resulted in a spill of hazardous materials at least once.

Reiche(pictured), 23, and Brooks, 27, were arrested on Saturday night. In a charging press release, US Attorney Brian Moran reveals that authorities have discovered 41 incidences in which dangerous shunts were placed on railroad tracks belonging to BNSF Railroads since January.

According to reports on her now-deleted Linkedin page, Reiche was previously employed as a Deputy Field Organizer for Washington State Democrats. She appears to be something of an environmentalist type, working as a park aide for the state, a naturalist for Outer Island Excursions, and a mentor for Wild Whatcom. Reiche also has a bachelor’s degree in German from the University of Western Washington.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Photography of Reiche’s vehicle released in the Department of Justice charging document reveals an “Indigenous Land” bumper sticker, suggesting the territorial United States was stolen from Native Americans.

Charging documents reveal that claims of responsibility for the shunt placements were posted onto anarchist website, a platform used by ANTIFA militants to plan property destruction, violent crimes, and attacks on traditional American statues. The post regarding the placement of the shunt invoked supposed solidarity with Native American groups who oppose the construction of a Canadian oil pipeline.

This claim of responsibility stated that the shunting activity was carried out in solidarity with Native American tribes in Canada seeking to prevent the construction of an oil pipeline across British Columbia, and with the express goal of disrupting BNSF operations and supplies for the pipeline,” cites the charging documents.

A railroad safety deputy chief describes witnessing the two women placing the shunt device on railroad tracks by use of a game camera on November 28th. Whatcom County Sheriff’s Deputies were alerted, and when the two women were found at the scene, they claimed they were merely looking for lost keys. However, authorities determined Reiche was in “possession of a brown paper bag that contained rubber gloves, a piece of black insulated copper wire, and a Makita Drill with a wheel-shaped wire brush attachment in the chuck.” The same wire had been used in previous shunting devices. A shunt was ultimately discovered near where the two women were confronted by sheriff’s deputies.

The terrorist suspects were released from jail in advance of a scheduled December 14th court appearance. The criminal charges are punishable by sentences of up to 20 years in prison. Their booking information at the Whatcom County Jail specifies state charges filed against the leftist militants.

Both of them are identified as Bellingham, Washington residents in the DOJ press release.


Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!