Connect with us

Culture

Bezos Obeys Schiff’s Anti-Vax Censorship Demands

Published

on

In a remarkable turnaround, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) published an open letter last week to Jeff Bezos demanding that Amazon stop “surfacing and recommending products and content that discourage parents from vaccinating their children” and Amazon complied within hours. According to Caroline O’Donovan of Buzzfeed, popular anti-vax documentaries were promptly removed from search results and Amazon Prime Video streaming.

Following similar calls by Schiff amid an outbreak of measles in Washington: Youtube, Pinterest and Facebook have all acceded to demands to crack down on anti-vax content. The World Health Organization has listed anti-vax sentiment as one of the top 10 global health threats of 2019.

Social media businesses who sort and recommend content by algorithm face unique ethical challenges: do they have responsibilities for harm facilitated by content they host or promote? Algorithms designed to better serve users by recommending similar content could exacerbate tendencies towards conspiracism, driving them ever further into a bubble without alternate viewpoints.

However, there is no evidence that censorship of conspiracy theory content solves the problem and plenty to suggest that it worsens it. Contrary to the popular conception of the crazy lone conspiracy theorist, studies have shown that conspiracy thinking is driven by natural impulses rather than mental illness and over half of Americans believe in at least one conspiracy theory.

A study comparing reactions to censored vs. uncensored video with suicidal content found no difference in how they were received and actually found that both reduced suicidality.

Another study in BMC Medical Ethics on combating vaccine hesitancy recommended against “coercive public policies” in favor of “increasing citizen engagement on vaccination to help inform a parent-centered approach and legitimize public policy measures.” Since conspiracy thinking hinges on distrust of authority and feelings of powerlessness, censorship compounds the root causes where the best prescription would be open dialogue that emphasizes personal freedom.

Conspiracy theories can also be true. Until the Chicago Police outlined evidence that Jussie Smollet conspired with two Nigerians to fake a hate crime, the conspiracy was just a theory.

Likewise, Schiff is a conspiracy theorist in his own right as the standard-bearer for the conspiracy theory that President Donald Trump conspired with Russia to rig the 2016 election. There is no evidence of such a conspiracy to date, but there is hard proof of a Clinton campaign conspiracy to propagate a Russia collusion narrative through millions of campaign dollars funneled through a law firm to a foreign spy.

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

You Might Like

Deplorables

Appeals Court Refuses to Expunge Joe Arpaio’s Contempt Conviction After Presidential Pardon

A judge isn’t happy about the pardon.

Published

on

A federal appeals court is refusing to expunge former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpario’s contempt of court conviction, after the sheriff was granted a presidential pardon by President Trump.

Such a legal move is rare if not unprecedented for the recipient of a presidential pardon. Usually federal and state court systems dismiss the convictions of people granted presidential pardon.

Arpaio was convicted of contempt of court in 2017 for refusing to change the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department’s practices after a judge mandated that the agency cease immigration raids.

Three judges of the liberal San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court upheld a ruling from a lower circuit court refusing to expunge the legal record of Arpaio’s conviction. The move sets new legal precedent for a recipient of a presidential pardon.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • Should Mitt Romney be EXPELLED from the U.S. Senate by the GOP for his vote to convict President Trump?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Arpaio was a frequent target of Eric Holder and the Obama administration, often coming under intense DOJ scrutiny for the practices of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department.

Arpaio ran for the United States Senate in 2018, coming in third in the Republican Primart behind Martha McSally and Kelli Ward. He’s now running for his old position as Maricopa County Sheriff once more at the ripe age of 87.

In any case, presidential pardons have traditionally resulted in dismissal of criminal convictions in federal and state courts. It’s hard to think of the 9th Circuit’s decision to maintain the conviction as anything more than a political slight to President Trump.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


You Might Like

Trending