Connect with us

Tech

Big League Politics Joins Parler As Partner, Embraces Free Speech On Social Media

Big League Politics is happy to join the pro-free speech social media platform.

Published

on

Big League Politics Parler Partner

Big League Politics and many of its reporters have now joined Parler, the pro-free speech social media website rumored to be part of President Donald Trump’s social media strategy for his 2020 reelection campaign.

Big League Politics is now on the popular pro-free speech platform, and is an official Parler Partner. While Facebook, Twitter, and Google actively attempt to hide our articles and reduce their reach, Parler and Big League Politics are working together to provide high quality, pro-America news to the public.

Perhaps Parler’s most fascinating and distinguishing difference from the other big tech giants is its devotion to freedom of speech. While Facebook, Twitter, Google, and virtually every other big tech website offer byzantine rules regarding what they consider hate speech, sensitive content, targeted harassment, and other forms of behavior they consider toxic, Parler stands behind the United States Constitution’s definition of free speech.

Trending: Shipments of 20,000+ Fake US Driver’s Licenses From China Intercepted at Chicago Airport

Parler’s Community Guidelines, a five page long, easily read and understood document available on its website, enshrines this:

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Parler desires to stand behind the definition of free speech as laid out in the United States Constitution in order to firmly and clearly state the type of communication that is allowed and that is prohibited within our platform. All users have full control over their account(s) to create and sustain conversations within accepted legal boundaries. Free speech allows users to express them-selves on their own profile and spread their message to their followers but it also allows users to avoid speech they do not want to see by blocking/banning or muting content they do not want tosee. This authority grants users the ability to publish content on their account, manage all direct interactions with other users and potentially filter material of others as they see fit. User have total control over the publishing, moderation and censorship of their accounts on the Parler platform. This establishes Parler as a neutral party whose responsibility is to uphold the law as defined by the United States Constitution, United States Supreme Court and the FCC consumer guidelines on obscenity, indecent and profane broadcasts.

In short, if you can legally make a statement in the United States, you can make the same statement on Parler. This, naturally, does not include threats, promises or incitements to commit violence, blackmail, slander, or other forms of legitimately illegal speech. However, there are no rules against or definitions of hate speech, fake news, or other terms used by the other big tech giants.

Even more exciting are the rumors of President Trump joining the pro-free speech platform as part of his 2020 reelection campaign’s social media strategy.

Big League Politics reported:

Amid censorship of conservative media by tech giants, a Tuesday POLITICO report said that President Donald J. Trump is considering opening an account on Parler, a Twitter-esque social network.

“According to one person close to Trump’s campaign, the president’s team is considering setting him up with an account on the site,” the report said. “A senior Trump campaign official said that there was no imminent plan to have the president join the platform, but that [Campaign Manager Brad] Parscale is scouting Parler.”

It is unclear what type of effect a Trump move would have on existing platforms that he uses, like Twitter. It is unlikely that Trump would stop using other forms of social media completely.

Many prominent, banned conservatives have found a new digital home on Parler amid the censorship crisis, that may be reaching its zenith as Project Veritas Action exposes Google for promising to never allow another “Trump situation” to occur.

After James O’Keefe’s earth shattering report, Google responded by banning and blacklisting many of the videos from its platforms, including YouTube.

Most of the Big League Politics staff of writers and reporters have now joined Parler, with the rest of the team planning to join soon:

Big League PoliticsThe official Parler account for our publication.

Patrick HowleyBig League Politics editor-in-chief’s new Parler account.

Peter D’AbroscaBig League Politics senior reporter’s Parler account.

God Emperor Trump – The Parler account owned by this reporter, dedicated to a blend of conservative news and memes.

Luke RohlfingBig League Politics reporter’s Parler account.

Shane TrejoBig League Politics reporter’s Parler account.

Jose NinoBig League Politics reporter’s Parler account.

Richard MoorheadBig League Politics reporter’s Parler account.

Some of our popular contributors are also on the free speech platform, including Laura Loomer, who was banned and branded a hate figure by virtually every other big tech platform over the last year.

Other banned figures and organizations now on Parler include Milo Yiannopoulos, Infowars, Paul Joseph Watson, Gavin McInnes, and Nick Monroe.

While big tech frequently bans the mobile apps of free speech social media platforms and organizations, Parler currently has apps available on Google Play and the Apple App Store. The social media website brands itself as a mobile-first platform.

Tech

Twitter Targets Alternative Video Platform Bitchute as Big Tech’s Censorship Crackdown Intensifies

Big Tech wants to cripple the free flow of information.

Published

on

The social media giant Twitter is targeting Bitchute, the alternative video service that allows for content to be shared freely on the platform, with Draconian censorship.

Independent journalist Tim Pool made the discovery in a Twitter post:

This may have been done at the behest of ANTIFA-style organization, Hope Not Hate, which lobbies Big Tech to censor their political enemies.

“Major social media platforms including Facebook and Twitter should ban the sharing of Bitchute links on their platform, thereby significantly reducing the impact of this extreme and dangerous material,” Hope Not Hate wrote in their blog about Bitchute.

In addition to calling for Draconian censorship against Bitchute on social media platforms, they also call for Bitchute to be slapped with criminal repercussions for permitting free speech on their platform.

“Law enforcement investigate Bitchute for distribution of content that breaks British law, including terrorism legislation,” Hope Not Hate wrote. “The Government should introduce an Online Harms Bill that includes meaningful consequences for bespoke platforms such as Bitchute that host, promote or distribute terrorism, extremist and hateful content.”

Bitchute has grown in influence for hosting videos that have been driven off of major platforms. A viral video of front-line doctors urging for the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 was scrubbed from YouTube but can still be accessed on Bitchute.

The Bitchute links to banned videos from the courageous medical whistleblowers have been posted many different times onto Twitter:

Twitter will not allow users to access these videos without providing the following warning:

As Twitter targets Bitchute for allowing freedom of speech on their monopoly platform, they are actively allowing pedophiles to discuss their lustful desires for children.

Big League Politics has reported on how Twitter explicitly amended their terms of service so pedophiles are allowed on the platform to talk about how they want to rape kids, with child nudity being permissible in certain instances:

Social media giant Twitter has quietly amended their terms of service to allow for “discussions related to… attraction towards minors” to be allowed on their platform.

“Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way,” reads Twitter’s terms of service.

Twitter allow noted that they would allow for nude depictions of children on their platform in certain instances.

“Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a limited number of scenarios e.g., works by internationally renowned artists that feature minors,” they added.

Twitter’s pro-pedo policy may have been implemented at the behest of Dr. James Cantor, who describes himself as a proud Jewish homosexual. Cantor is a leading researcher and advocate for pedophiles, who he refers to as minor-attracted persons.

Cantor wrote a letter in Jan. 2018 to John Starr, who works as Director of Trust and Safety with Twitter, with other university academics. The letter urged Twitter to allow pedophiles to network and discuss their attraction to children on the monolithic social media platform.

“Many of us have worked with a group of such non-offending pedophiles, also known as anti-contact MAPs (Minor-Attracted Persons), in a peer support network called Virtuous Pedophiles (@virpeds), as well as in other support networks,” they wrote in their letter.

“Recently, a prominent member of Virtuous Pedophiles, who goes by the pseudonym Ender Wiggin (@enderphile2), had his account permanently suspended by Twitter. At least one other member of the same network, Šimon Falko (@simgiran), also had his account permanently suspended around the same time, and a number of other accounts of non-offending, anti-contact MAPs have since been permanently or temporarily suspended,” they added.

They argued that denying pedophiles a place on the social media platform may lead to these so-called virtuous pedophiles acting on their impulses to sexually victimize kids.

The values of these tech giants do not align with American values. If these hostile actors refuse to abide by American values, they ought to lose their Section 230 privileges under the Communications Decency Act.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


No articles were found at this time.

Trending