Connect with us

Culture

California Voters Resoundingly Reject Affirmative Action

Published

on

To many people’s surprise, California delivered great news on November 3, 2020.

Voters went to the polls and rejected Proposition 16, which would have enacted affirmative action in California.

If passed, Proposition 16 would give public universities the power to create admissions quotas based on race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin. The Los Angeles Times reported that state and local governments would have also been permitted to use these factors during the hiring process of government employees and when government contracts are awarded. Voters rejected this initiative by a 56 percent to 44 percent margin.

Trending: The Attorney General on His Way Out? Trump Mulls Firing Bill Barr, Advisers Trying to Dissuade Him

This initiative was brought before the voters by the California Legislature, which is under firm Democrat control. It’s purpose was to repeal Proposition 209, a ballot initiative that voters approved in 1996 that prohibited affirmative action policies in the Golden State.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Proposition 16 backers were able raise over $20 million. On the other hand, opponents only raised about $1.5 million. However, money was not the deciding factor with regards to this vote due to the fact that there was a strong bloc of opposition to the measure as reflected in recent polls.

Ward Connerly, a former University of California regent who supported Proposition 209,  believed that California voters viewed Proposition 16 as an assault on fairness.

“[Proponents] still have not persuaded the people that it is OK to discriminate against one group of people in the interest of trying to benefit another,” Connerly declared on the night of November 3.

Even a blue state such as California has voters that know there are limits to social engineering. Americans, no matter how radical some aspects of their politics may be, still have a residual sense of respect for the concept of fairness. In addition, they understand the divisive nature of using racial criteria to give people job opportunities.

It’s unfortunate that there are not strong partisan forces willing to take on such policies. However, referenda do offer opportunities for citizens to have their voices heard when the political class is not willing to take on issues that concern them most. Californian voters should be congratulated for coming to their senses on the question of affirmative action.

 

Culture

BIDEN’S AMERICA: Psychotic Anti-White ‘Diversity’ Training Returns in San Diego School District

Anti-white indoctrination.

Published

on

The San Diego Unified School District is offering a “white privilege” training that claims all white people are racist and forces whites to engage in bizarre self-hate conditioning.

Christopher F. Rufo of City Journal exposed the materials that are being used in these trainings on social media:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Because of the journalistic work of Rufo, President Donald Trump officially banned the teaching of critical race theory by the federal government.

Big League Politics reported on the president’s achievement in stopping the left-wing agenda to systemically discriminate against white people funded by taxpayer dollars:

Weeks after banning the use of hateful critical race theory indoctrination sessions among federal agencies, President Donald Trump is expanding the CRT ban to companies that receive lucrative federal government contracts.

The President announced he is expanding the ban to cover private government contractors in a series of Tuesday tweets.

The ban on governmental contractors will doubtlessly instill panic in the CEO’s of powerful Fortune 500 companies, who love to tout their supposed virtue by staging race-based trainings on their often unwilling employees. Many of these companies are largely dependent on payments from the United States government, despite masquerading as a “free enterprise.”

The President’s executive order on the matter refutes the liberal identity-politics doctrine alleging that some people are inherently oppressive or evil on the basis of their race.

The ban’s coverage of contractors that do business with the United States military may be the most significant. Organizations such as Sandia National Laboratories, which is a longstanding federal nuclear research institutions, were busted staging hateful “trainings” in which white male employees were coerced into repeating progressive and BLM-style drivel.

However, Joe Biden intends to bring back critical race theory within the federal government if the color revolution coup to overthrow Trump is successful. Democrats are inflicting a hateful agenda to weaken America for their “Great Reset” world government plot.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending