Connect with us


Campus insanity: Christian Center vandalized with anti-Trump graffiti, incident ‘swept under the rug’



Big League Politics has obtained exclusive photographs of anti-Trump graffiti and vandalism of a Christian Center on the campus of a liberal arts college in Jackson, Mississippi.

“They just swept it under the rug,” said the student at Millsaps College who provided the photos.

The student has asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution from faculty, staff, and other students at the school.

Trending: Bezos-Linked Thinktank Official Calls for Michael Anton’s Execution for Exposing Anti-Trump Color Revolution

“The photos were taken in April, right at the end of the semester, inside of a building called the Christian Center,” the student said.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

According to the student, the vandals did not deface the church inside the Christian Center, but that basically every other room was graffitied.

Here are the photos:


One photo shows the words “Phil Bryant can s*ck a f*ck” painted on the wall. Dewey P. “Phil” Bryant is the 64th Governor of Mississippi.

Both professors and students alike participated in the vandalism. In the bottom left-hand corner of the one of the photos is Professor James E. Bowley, chairman of the Religious Studies Department at Millsaps.

(James E. Bowley, Chairman of the Religious Studies Department, courtesy of Millsaps College)

The professor’s anti-Trumpism extends beyond the campus community, as evidenced by samplings from his Facebook page.

(Screenshot from James E. Bowley’s Facebook page)

According to Millsaps’ website, the school is dedicated to academic excellence, open inquiry and free expression, the exploration of faith to inform vocation, and the innovative shaping of the social, economic, and cultural progress of our region.

Big League Politics reached out the school for comment and was directed to Millsaps’ Director of Communications and Marketing, John Sewell.

“This is the first time I’m hearing about this,” said Sewell.

“That building is under construction, and I haven’t been over there in a while,” he said.

Sewell then asked Big League Politics to provide him the photographs that we had obtained.

About an hour after the photos were sent, he replied with the following statement:

“Defamation of character or destruction of property is unacceptable at Millsaps College. The administration found this incident to be offensive, hurtful, and contrary to our values of encouraging civil and respectful discourse between disparate points of view, and subsequently took swift action to address it. The individuals involved underwent a disciplinary process, and the rooms were repainted as soon as possible.”

Another employee in Residence Life told Big League Politics that she had not heard about the event either.

“The administration just re-painted the building, nothing else ever came of it,” the student said.

The student told Big League Politics that the students still attend the school, and the four photographed professors still teach there. The building was already under construction when they broke in and vandalized the rooms, the student said.

“No one, including the four faculty members in the pictures, got in trouble, as far as I know,” the student said.

According to the student, anti-republican bias on campus had been addressed with faculty members many times by the few Republican students on campus.

When the students followed up with one dean about the vandalism incident, the dean refused to give them an update, saying that it would be in violation of the privacy of the perpetrators.

“Two months after the fact, the administration was saying that the students will be held responsible, but no one confirmed that they had been.”


Judge Amy Coney Barrett Recently Approved Democrat COVID-19 Lockdown Policies

Her decision should raise some eyebrows.



Judge Amy Coney Barrett has emerged as the choice of Conservative Twitter to be the successor on the Supreme Court to replace deceased former justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died on Friday after many bouts of cancer.

However, Barrett’s record is troubling on many issues, with a ruling that gives Democrats in Illinois blanket authority to shut down society based on COVID-19 mass hysteria standing out as particularly heinous.

Barrett concurred with the majority in Illinois Republican Party et al. v. J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois to keep the illegal lockdown in place and allow Democrats to rip up the Constitution under the guise of safety. She hid behind the precedent of Jacobsen v. Massachusetts (1905) in an attempt to avoid culpability for her decision.

“At least at this stage of the pandemic, Jacobson takes off the table any general challenge to [Pritzker’s executive order] based on the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of liberty,” the majority opinion read in the case.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

It continued: “[W]hile in the face of a pandemic the Governor of Illinois was not compelled to make a special dispensation for religious activities, see Elim, nothing in the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment barred him from doing so. As in the cases reconciling the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses, all that the Governor did was to limit to a certain degree the burden on religious exercise that [the governor’s executive order] imposed.”

While Barrett rolls over to the far left and allows Democrats to rip up the Constitution, other judges are actually living up to their oath, such as the Trump-appointed District Judge in Pennsylvania, William S. Stickman.

In his ruling, Stickman refused to hide behind precedent to allow the constitution to be destroyed by Democrats. He effectively deep-sixed Pennsylvania’s lockdown and obliterated the abominable Jacobson decision.

He wrote: “Jacobson was decided over a century ago. Since that time, there has been substantial development of federal constitutional law in the area of civil liberties… That century of development has seen the creation of tiered levels of scrutiny for constitutional claims. They did not exist when Jacobson was decided. […]”

“The Court shares the concerns expressed by Justice Alito… and believes that an extraordinarily deferential standard based on Jacobson is not appropriate,” Stickman added.

Patriotic attorney Robert Barnes has levied additional criticism against Barrett for her unwillingness to stand up to Democrat overreach.

“For example, Barrett, I would oppose her nomination personally. So I would do whatever I can to see her nomination fail. I have no interest in seeing someone like that on the bench,” Barnes explained during an interview on the Viva Frei YouTube channel.

“She comes from the old money corporate South, a world I’m familiar with and the kind of people I’d never want to see in positions of power… That’s the world she comes from. Her dad was a big Shell oil corporate lawyer,” he continued.

Barnes explained how Barrett’s history working as a Clerk for deceased former Justice Antonin Scalia is giving the false impression that she shares his staunch originalist beliefs when that is not in fact the case. He explained that her rise is similar to that of Chief Justice John Roberts, whose record of extreme cowardice on the bench has harmed the nation immeasurably.

“This is how Justice Roberts got on the bench. You do two things if you’re on the Republican side of the aisle: You let people know that you believe Roe v. Wade should be overturned even if you don’t believe that… And you play the corporate side of the equation,” he said.

“But most importantly, you get that Justice and his extended intellectual heavyweights to lobby for you to be appointed to the judicial bench down the road… That’s why people are pushing Barrett,” Barnes added.

Barnes highlighted some of Barrett’s worst decisions in a blistering Twitter thread.


Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!