Connect with us

Big League National Security

Chairman of Senate Homeland Security: Give me all comms from Comey, 15 other FBI, DOJ officials

Published

on

The chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee sent a letter late Wednesday to Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein requesting he turn over all communications from former FBI director James B. Comey Jr., former FBI general counsel James A. Baker, Deputy FBI Director Andrew G. McCabe, as well as 13 other FBI agents and Justice Department officials.

Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein (File photo)

“On Jan. 19, 2018, the Department of Justice (DOJ) produced to the committee 384 pages of text messages exchanged between FBI officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok,” wrote Sen. Ronald H. Johnson (R.-Wis.), whose committee has oversight over the operations of all parts of the government in addition to homeland security. “I write to request additional information about FBI records connected to this investigation.”

Rosenstein is in charge of all matters regarding the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 political cycle because Attorney General Jeff B. Sessions recused himself from this situation in accordance with Justice Department rules.

Trending: Bezos-Linked Thinktank Official Calls for Michael Anton’s Execution for Exposing Anti-Trump Color Revolution

“Please provide an unclassified response to the greatest extent possible,” he wrote. “If a full response requires the production of classified information, please provide this material under separate cover via the Office of Senate Security.”

The senator’s letter cast a wide net when he asked for all texts, emails, memos, and voicemails relating to the FBI’s investigation of former secretary of state Hillary R. Clinton, and candidates for the 2016 presidential election for the individuals named.

The Wisconsin Republican also asked specifically for the emails between the former first lady and President Barack Obama exchanged while Clinton was in the “territory of a sophisticated adversary” that Comey referred to in a draft of what would become his July 5 announcement that he would discourage federal prosecutors from going after Clinton for her handling of sensitive electronic correspondence on her private server while leading the State Department.

Notes from the FBI’s July 2, 2016 interview with Clinton suggest the country was Russia.

The other individuals Johnson is asking about are:

In text messages produced to the committee, Page and Strzok make references to communicating with other FBI employees via text message, phone call, email, and voice mail and additional text messages created the impression FBI officials used non-official email accounts and messaging programs to communicate about official business.

The chairman wrote to FBI Director Christopher A. Wray Jan. 20 to request an update regarding missing text messages between Page and Strzok, in addition to questions about how the FBI handles or monitors its workers who use private accounts for official business.

Johnson wrote that he was very interested in an August 2016 series texts exchanged between Page and Strzok where the two paramours refer to record-retention issues with the Samsung phones issued by the FBI for official business and how FBI employees preferred their private iPhones:

Ms. Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so
Mr. Strzok: Oh hot damn.  I’m happy to pilot that . . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?
Ms. Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them.  Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from omb, but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule.  His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we.
Ms. Page: Helps that Dd had a terrible time with his phone [redacted] which made him concerned for our folks all over the place.
Ms. Page: These phones suck as much as they do because of the program we use to capture texts, full stop.
Mr. Strzok: No doubt.
Mr. Strzok: I’m not convinced short of OPR, that text capture capability really deters anything.
Mr. Strzok: If I want to copy/take classified, I’m sure as hell not going to do it on this phone.
Ms. Page: I thought it was more from a discovery perspective.
Mr. Strzok: Probably.  So just make a rule no texts of a discoverable nature.  Like you said, what are CBP, DEA, others doing?
Ms. Page: I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing.  But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.

Johnson also cited this April 2016 exchange between Page and Strzok, where they refer to communicating with other FBI employees via text message, phone call, email and voicemail and private emails and private messaging services:

Mr. Strzok: [Redacted] I find I’m increasingly profoundly bothered by JBs [sic] call and the lack of ANY heads up.  Deeply.  It was wrong given what I had already been asked to do.  Gonna sleep on it and see where I am in the morning.
Mr. Strzok: Because you know where I was on Thursday or Friday night – when I was complaining about everyone expecting me to deliver the hard message while they vacillated in discussing with their counterparts.  About how my sense of justness and character was at odds with waiting until Sat to say something.  And rightfully, you point out stop being so prima donna-ish and just do it.  And I do.  And then I find out an hour later that in addition to what I was asked to do, JB went to counsel and had the discussion he did.  And I’m the one facing the music.  From some who I have known for a long time.  Nobody else pays the price.  Nobody else will have the same straight hard discussion.  Yet, I’m the only one who violated his sense of integrity to swallow hard and deliver the message.
Mr. Strzok: I’m not sure if I want to be part of this
Ms. Page: You are part of this and that’s not going to change.  But I think you have every right to be angry and frustrated about bring left out of the loop on your investigation, especially when you’re going to be left holding the bag.  And I think you’re entitled to say something to Baker about that, though on this one I would probably discuss with Bill first.
Ms. Page: I’m sorry [redacted].  Big big case, big big problems.  But God knows you’re still the right guy to do it.
Mr. Strzok: Gmailed you two drafts of what I’m thinking of sending Bill, would appreciate your thoughts.  Second (more recent) is updated so you can skip the first. 

Johnson told Rosenstein that he wanted no later than St. Valentine’s Day.

Big League National Security

NEW: Joe Biden Bashes Incoming Trump Administration In Leaked 2016 Call to President of Ukraine

Completely inappropriate.

Published

on

Joe Biden speaks in critical and partisan terms of the incoming Trump administration in a new leaked call to the President of Ukraine unveiled Wednesday.

In the call, conducted in November 2016 a week after then-candidate Trump’s election victory, Biden bashes the incoming administration to the foreign leader, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. Biden assails the Trump transition team as incompetent, turning down the idea of visiting the country before the January transition before Trump is “fully briefed” on matters related to Ukraine.

In a second call, Biden asks for Poroshenko to describe his conversations with incoming President Trump, going to to speak of Trump in more dismissive terms. He describes Trump as a “dog who caught the car, and who doesn’t know what to do.” Not quite a “dog-faced pony soldier,” but definitely not an appropriate way for an outgoing vice president to describe an incoming president to a foreign leader.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A Ukrainian comedian originally released the calls, suggesting questionable operational security within the conversations of Joe Biden and Poroshenko. Biden has a lengthy history of ethical questions regarding his relationship with Ukraine, including looking the other way as his son Hunter secured an extremely lucrative position at a Ukrainian oil company without any experience whatsoever in the energy industry.

Biden himself would later go on to demand the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating corruption allegations against the younger Biden, a clear conflict of interest Biden merely dismissed when he spoke openly of securing the prosecutor’s firing at a Council on Foreign Relations public event.

This is a totally inappropriate way for a Vice President to speak to a foreign leader, and the public should be concerned about how Biden plans to conduct diplomacy should he be elected President.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending