Connect with us

Culture

Christian Soccer Star Who Refused to Celebrate LGBT Agenda Was Kept Off of U.S. Women’s Team, Report Says

The team wasn’t necessarily picked based on their talent, but because they pushed a certain agenda.

Published

on

The United States women’s national soccer team (USWNT) has been very outspoken in their support of leftist political beliefs and the LGBT agenda since they won the gold medal, and it appears the team was picked specifically to conform to that agenda. A Christian soccer star was allegedly blacklisted from the team after she refused to participate in the team’s gratuitous displays.

Jaelene Hinkle, former national team fullback, was excluded from the roster for the USWNT. She had previously refused to play in 2017 when the entire team had rainbow-colored numbers to celebrate degeneracy during Pride Month.

Even some of Hinkle’s critics like sportswriter Kim McCauley of SBNation, who believes the soccer star is a “vocal homophobe,” had to admit that “there isn’t a better pure tactical fit available than Hinkle” for the USWNT team.

Trending: Grassroots Leaders Send Final Warning to GOP Establishment: Rejecting Trump Means Death of Republican Party

“I just felt so convicted in my spirit that it wasn’t my job to wear this jersey,” Hinkle said during an interview with the “700 Club” in May 2018.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Hinkle knew that standing with her conscience and her morals could have consequences, which they likely did as she was excluded from the team.

“I’m essentially giving up the one dream little girls dream about their entire life, and I’m saying no to. It was very disappointing,” she said.

The USWNT, which has been relentlessly promoted by the mainstream media largely due to their political message, could not take one dissenting opinion from their anti-American signaling.

“Your message is excluding people. You’re excluding me. You’re excluding people that look like me. You’re excluding people of color,” open lesbian Megan Rapinoe told the president in a CNN interview.

John Stonestreet, who works as president of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview in Colorado Springs, CO, told the Washington Times that her exclusion is consistent with the growing persecution of Christianity in the West nowadays.

“You do have a very activist team. It’s very much a part of the program,” Stonestreet said. “And if we were talking about just any player, it wouldn’t be really clear, but just because of her abilities — Jaelene Hinkle is a heck of a player — it makes it that much more suspect.”

Being a principled Christian in the day and age of secular globalism will cause an individual to make sacrifices that may come at a serious personal cost, Stonestreet explains.

“We know that increasingly there is going to have to be conformity on your viewpoint to be able to participate,” he added. “I think that’s inevitable. We use the phrase ‘the theology of being fired’ — in this case, it’s the theology of being cut.”

A Pew research study released in April showed that Christians are the world’s most persecuted faith, largely because of what happens in the third-world. However, anti-Christian bigotry is being expedited into the first world now as the LGBT agenda continues to corrode the soul of the West.

Free Speech

Does the Arizona Constitution Provide Means for Lawmakers to Crack Down on Big Tech Censorship?

Does the Arizona Constitution provide protections from Big Tech?

Published

on

The Arizona Constitution provides stronger protections for freedom of speech than the First Amendment does, potentially providing legislative solutions to Big Tech censorship in the state at a moment where political censorship is more pervasive than ever.

Article 2 Section 6, Arizona Constitution states that “Every person may freely speak, write, and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. “

This differs greatly from the federal constitution in that it doesn’t limit the powers of a legislature to restrict freedom of speech. The US Constitution identifies “Congress” as the body it’s restricting from making a law abridging the freedom of speech.

The speech rights established by the Arizona Constitution are thus expressed positively; recognizing a right belonging to the people, as opposed to negating an infringement of said right.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Quite obviously, the Arizona Constitution was written in an 1910, an era in which the internet would’ve been just as inconceivable as it was in 1789.

In a 2019 Arizona Supreme Court case, the state’s highest court recognized in a 4-3 judgement that the Arizona Constitution provided greater protections than the federal constitution. The case recognized that violations of the First Amendment would represent de facto violations of the

It’s not outside the realm of possibility that the Arizona Attorney General, or state legislature, could hold Big Tech oligarchs to account for violating the Article 2 Section 6 rights of Arizona citizens- especially in a context the major platforms are collectively adjudicated to be acting as a trust in order to suppress competition and silence lawful speech.

Three Arizona legislators called upon Attorney General Mark Brnovich to begin an antitrust investigation into Big Tech oligarchs following the coordinated deplatforming operation against Parler, in which both Amazon and Apple colluded to restrict the free speech platform from the internet.

In an era where the overwhelming majority of free speech is communicated online, the censorious actions of Big Tech very plausibly represent an assault of the right of free expression guaranteed in the Arizona Constitution. Both chambers of Arizona’s legislature remain Republican, even as the state has become purple, and action against Big Tech censorship on the state level could become a real possibility in the coming years.


Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending