CONFIRMED: Comey Will Be Guilty Of Perjury If He Testifies That Trump Obstructed Justice


WASHINGTON — Fired former FBI director James Comey will be guilty of perjury if he testifies that President Donald Trump tried to influence his Russia investigation, according to a top national attorney who is well-versed in the matter.

Comey will testify sometime after Memorial Day (Monday) in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Comey also postponed his testimony before NeverTrumper Jason Chaffetz’s House Oversight Committee in order to have a conversation with “Russia” special investigator Robert Mueller. The testimony will hinge on a conversation that Trump allegedly had with Comey, in which Trump allegedly discussed the investigation into his former national security adviser General Michael Flynn.

Comey is already hinting that he is going to try to get Trump implicated in an “obstruction of justice” plot. A strange CNN article cited a “person familiar with his thinking” to claim that Comey “now believes that President Donald Trump was trying to influence his judgment about the Russia probe.” The article notes that intent must be proven before an obstruction of justice charge can be leveled at Trump.

But as Big League Politics reported, Comey previously testified in no uncertain terms that Trump did not obstruct his investigations. Comey made that statement under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Trending: Rod Rosenstein Submitted False Documents To Senate Concerning His Interrogation of Hillary Clinton

A major national attorney told Big League Politics that Comey is “damned if he did and damned if he didn’t.”

“To change his story would suggest he lied to Congress and perjured himself,” the lawyer said about the potential open-and-shut perjury case. “He would be guilty of perjury under 18 US Code Section 1621.”

Here is Comey’s sworn statement clearing Trump of obstruction of justice and rendering Comey’s upcoming testimony meaningless to the establishment cause of impeaching the president (unless they can find something else to try before the testimony happens):

With Comey knocked out of the game, the Establishment forces are seeing their Russia narrative fall apart. CNN recently ran a segment reporting that Russians tried to use Flynn as a back-channel to get to Trump, which actually hurts their own argument because why would the Russians need a back-channel to a president they are supposedly already manipulating?

Blackwater founder Erik Prince, who was also accused of being involved in some kind of Russian back-channel to get to Trump, made that obvious point in an interview with Fox News madman Tucker Carlson.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


  1. This is a ridiculous witch hunt to distract Democrats from their party’s rigged nomination and abandonment of the working classes.

  2. I keep seeing people selling this testimony as clearing Trump, but she asked a specific question….”If the AG or senior officials at the DOJ”. He would not perjure himself if he alleges Trump did 🙁

  3. i can easily see Comey taking the “atttempt to influence does not equal obstruction” route of argumentation

  4. Only perjury? If Comey thought this, he was duty-bound to report it to the Attorney General. If he did not, he’s also guilty of obstruction of justice.

  5. Who’d believe Comey on anything now? Get rid of the weasel, I for one do not care to hear anything he has to say.

  6. Listen to what she says again. “So if the A/G or senior officials at the DOJ opposes a specific investigation”, she does not say President. This maybe Comey’s out!! Not good!

  7. You know the russia stuff is real open your fucken eyeballs. The seth Rich has become a propaganda for russia since Assange got involved and leaked to wikileaks for them. All they do is contribute conspiracy and now bugging the shit out the uk

  8. In that clip Comey was responding to a question about interference by the DOJ. He might attempt to say his answer was referring only to the DOJ, leaving him wriggle room to say: “…oh sure, like I said, in my experience interference by the DOJ has never happened, but I was only talking about the DOJ, I never said anything about President Trump, and now you mention President Trump, oh boy do I have something to tell you about him”.

  9. Your reply is noted, along with many spelling,punctuation and grammatical mistakes..I will consider the source.
    But I have to ask,
    are you 10 years old, or just ignorant?

  10. This whole article is based on the lie that #Comey, “previously testified in no uncertain terms that Trump did not obstruct his investigations. Comey made that statement under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee.”
    He most certainly did NOT say a word about @POTUS in his answer. Video of Comey proves writer is wrong. Question was clear as a bell. “CAN AG or DOJ high level officials”…NOT, “Did Trump ask,”
    Writer either doesn’t understand English, or is purposely lying for some reason. Only the ignorant, uninformed, stupid or illiterate can believe what this writer is saying…#justsayin

  11. Wouldn’t that be the epitome of irony? Comey goes to jail for perjury and obstruction of justice while he let an obvious crook slide because she “didn’the intend to break the law” as she was shredding and sending classified documents.

  12. Nope, he said “NO attempt … that he was aware of” .. none.
    Zero wriggle room without damaging his shattered reputation even further (at best), or coming down for perjury (at worst).

  13. Funny how after firing Comey, the FBI seems to have stopped leaking to liberal rags. Also funny how Comey’s “thoughts & memos” continue to leak to liberal rags. Could it be that the Director of the FBI was also the leaker that the FBI couldn’t silence? I’m glad President Trump silenced him for the sake of the credibility of the bureau