Connect with us

Congress

Democrat ‘Witness’ & Leftist Professor Pamela Karlan Slammed White Men in 2006 Rant

Liberals are claiming the elite university professor is a serious witness.

Published

on

A Stanford professor that Democrats in Congress trotted out as a supposedly serious witness attacked white men in a bitter rant to the American Constitution Society in 2006.

Karlan testified in support of President Trump’s impeachment(that won’t happen as long as Republicans control the Senate) in the House of Representatives on Wednesday, invoking her supposed expertise to claim that the President had committed impeachable acts by negotiating with Ukraine.

Yet her testimony appears to be all but worthless in the light of a clip that emerged of Karlan speaking in 2006, where she revealed her animosity against white men. The clip was first reported upon by Raheem Kassam.

Trending: Say His Name, Rowan Sweeney: 4-Year-Old White Boy Murdered in Ohio by Black Thug in Targeted Execution

The elite university professor attacked white men in vicious terms when speaking to the liberal group.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The rich, pampered, prodigal, sanctimonious, incurious, white, straight sons of the powerful do pretty well everywhere in the world, and they always have.

But what about us? Snarky, bisexual, Jewish women who want the freedom to say what we think, read what we want, and love who we do.

Karlan’s remarks were shamelessly slanted and prejudiced in 2006, but they’re even more inexcusable today. As the elite law school professor touts herself as a victim, it’s worth noting that white men have the highest suicide rate in America.

Surely Karlan can’t be considered an impartial and unbiased witness in light of her 2006 comments. She harbors prejudice against white men such as Donald Trump, and can’t be trusted to evaluate or judge them objectively.

It’s well past time to stop taking the nation’s coastal elite universities seriously. They’re merely indoctrination centers for faux-victims such as Karlan, who punch downward at those they perceive to be “bigots” from a comfortable perch in high society.

 

Congress

Democrat Congressmen Introduce Term Limits Legislation for SCOTUS Justices As Trump Prepares Nominee

Interesting timing.

Published

on

Three Democrat members of Congress are introducing legislation to institute term limits for Supreme Court justices, as President Trump prepares to nominate his third candidate for the court following the death of progressive liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Democrats Joe Kennedy, Ro Khanna, and Don Beyer are proposing legislation that would limit SCOTUS justice to a maximum term of eighteen years on the court.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Khanna has proposed an idea that would allow Presidents to appoint two judges in each term. “Senior” members of the court would be required to basically retired for every new member of the court.

It’s pretty funny the Democrats are uniting behind these proposals the moment they appear primed to lose control of the Supreme Court for a generation. They weren’t complaining when Obama was trying to replace Antonin Scalia with progressive Merrick Garland, even going so far as claiming that the stealth liberal was entitled to the seat. Reports emerging Friday suggest that President Donald Trump intends to nominate Amy Coney Barrett, a mostly conservative judge with a pro-life and immigration hawk judicial record.

The judicial branch of government is arguably the most flawed element of American governance, and it’s highly questionable how institutions such as the Supreme Court are able to appoint themselves a nearly unlimited amount of political power.

A better reform proposals would be to institute term limits for justices that only go into effect after the current members of the court vacate their seats. Anything else is simply a political power grab.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending