Connect with us

Politics

Department of Justice Supporting Challenges to Illinois, California Stay-at-Home Orders

Barr believes the states’ restrictions are excessive.

Published

on

The Department of Justice is signing onto challenges to the stay-at-home restrictions imposed by the state governments of California and Illinois, suggesting legal challenges to the onerous executive orders could stand a chance at success with the federal government’s support.

Attorney General Bill Barr had previously suggested that some restrictions enacted by state and local governments in response to coronavirus were ‘excessive,’ declining to rule out that the DOJ would support challenges to their extension. The AG had pledged to watch out for “overbearing infringement of constitutional and statutory protections.

The Justice Department has filed a statement of interest backing a lawsuit against Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, and sent letters to Los Angeles County officials questioning the length of the county’s planned stay-at-home restrictions, which has been extended indefinitely with some speculating the order could remain in place until July.

Trending: BASED: University Professor Placed on Leave After Exposing ‘Satanic, Globalist Elite’ in Explosive Letter

Reports of your recent public statements indicate that you suggested the possibility of long-term lockdown of the residents in the city and county of Los Angeles, regardless of the legal justification for such restrictions,” Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband wrote. “We remain concerned about what may be an arbitrary and heavy-handed approach to continuing stay-at-home requirements.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Illinois statement of interest has even greater legal significance, with the Justice Department signing onto a lawsuit filed against the governor over the ongoing lockdown. Steven Weinhoeft, the US Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois, explained the federal government’s attitude towards Illinois’ similarly indefinite lockdown period in the legal document.

However well-intentioned they may be, the executive orders appear to reach far beyond the scope of the 30-day emergency authority granted to the Governor under Illinois law,” explained the prosecutor. “Even during times of crisis, executive actions undertaken in the name of public safety must be lawful.

Expect legal challenges to stay-at-home restrictions to gather in steam as the public tires of their seeming indefinite nature and the economic consequences become more readily apparent. Blue state governors can’t expect to be backed up by the federal government, either.

Politics

Before the Election, DHS Set Up ‘Sector Coordinating Council’ with Dominion and Smartmatic Reps to Oversee the Vote

It appears the vote steal was ordered from the highest of levels.

Published

on

After the election, many so-called national experts have proclaimed that the 2020 vote was the most secure in history as they plot desperately to avoid legitimate inquiry.

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,” the members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee said in a statement.

“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections,” they added.

However, it has been revealed that Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) literally partnered with executives from Dominion and Smartmatic to form the Elections Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) to “protect” electoral infrastructure prior to the dubious vote.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The Sector Coordinating Council would like to assure the public that the SCC is working collectively to cooperate, share and exchange information with DHS and the nation’s intelligence community to ensure the integrity and security of our nation’s critical voting infrastructure,” the SCC executive committee stated prior to the election.

The SCC executive committee members included Chairman Chris Wlaschin of Election Systems & Software, Vice Chair Bryan Finney of Democracy Live, Kay Stimson of Dominion Voting Systems, Ericka Haas of the Electronic Registration Information Center, and Edwin Smith of Smartmatic. They operate in a dual capacity with the GCC, which were both mandated into existence in Jan. 2017 by DHS before President Trump could even be sworn into office.

Big League Politics reported on a survey of tech professionals indicating that a strong majority of them had major concerns about electoral integrity shortly before the vote took place:

The Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA) released the findings of a survey months before the election of the opinions of tech professionals, showing that a majority of them had deep concerns with electoral integrity heading into November’s election. The fake news media, of course, swept this crucial survey under the rug.

The professionals who were surveyed in September listed the rankings of their concerns as follows:

1. Misinformation/disinformation campaigns (73%)

2. Tampering with tabulation of voter results (64%)

3. Hacking or tampering with voter registration rolls

Hacking or tampering with voting machines (both 62%)

Retired Brigadier General and ISACA board director Greg Touhill was alarmed at the findings, hoping to throw cold water on the legitimate concerns of the tech professionals with regards to the voting process.

“The overwhelming majority of localities have sound election security procedures in place, but the public’s perception does not match the reality,” said Touhill.

“This means that governments, from the county level on up, need to clearly and robustly communicate about what they are doing to secure their election infrastructure. As the study indicates, the most real threat to the election—impacting all candidates from all parties—is misinformation and disinformation campaigns,” he added.

Tech professionals suggested the following remedies to allay election concerns:

1. Educating the electorate about misinformation (65%)

2. Using electronic voting machines with paper audit trails (64%)

3. Increased training for election and election security personnel (62%)

Unfortunately, none of those recommendations were ever put into place, and America had to deal with third-world nightmare on election day.

Even though the process has been rife with fraud and abnormalities, China-owned politicians and bureaucrats have championed the process anyway as they hope the dubious media-ordained outcome can be finalized as quickly as possible.

These so-called experts are desperate to gloss over the incredible fraud that happened during this year’s vote. They will seemingly make up any lie to avoid being held liable for their seditious actions.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending