Establishment Democrats are panicking as Vermont socialist Senator Bernie Sanders opens up a considerable lead in early primary and caucus states, such as Iowa.
A New York Times poll taken earlier this week for the first-to-vote Iowa caucus revealed Sanders has opened up his strongest lead thus far in the campaign in the state, leading neoliberal centrist Pete Buttigieg by a solid seven percentage points. Sanders took first place in the poll with 25%, with Buttigieg behind in second with 18%.
Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren came in third and fourth respectively with 17% and 15%.
The strong poll is the latest development fueling a general feeling of consternation among establishment Democrats who oppose Sanders’ candidacy.
Fake “conservatives” who have taken their place in the Democratic Party in the Trump era are also voicing their displeasure with the possibility of their new party nominating Sanders, presenting a presidential election in which traditional liberal centrist politicians are not nominated by either major American political party.
A national party could end up nominating an old crank who isn't even a member of their own party, who fires up brainless populists, and is surrounded by a cult of personality.
What could go wrong, I ask you
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) January 25, 2020
Democrats, wake the hell up.
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) January 25, 2020
President Obama himself has been rumored to be nervous about the prospects of Sanders’ candidacy, and reports have surfaced indicating that the Democratic Party kingpin would be willing to make a statement with the intention of kneecapping Sanders.
Although many conventional conservatives appear to dismiss Sanders’ prospects in a general election, President Trump himself is more prescient of the aged socialists’ populist appeal. The President has spoken of Sanders’ resonance on national trade policy, an issue both men have championed with great appeal to American workers.
However, the President believes that the Democratic establishment will likely take measures to rig the primary against Sanders, as it did in 2016. Considering the DNC’s track record of corruption, it’s far from a distant possibility.
A Trump vs. Sanders general election would likely be determined by whichever candidate can effectively channel the populist energies that fuel their respective political bases. Both candidates have strong trade track records. Sanders has the potential to appeal to working class voters on issues of income inequality usually dismissed by Republicans, but he’s also completely powerless to criticize globalist mass immigration policies that have fueled a cheap labor workforce for the corporate elite.
A general election between the two populists would be unlike anything in recent American political history, and judging from Sanders’ hot polling, it very well could be in the cards.
WATCH: Fulton County Poll Manager Susan Voyles Recounts Election Improprieties in Georgia Recount
A Georgia woman who submitted a sworn affidavit regarding election improprieties has recorded a new video detailing her experience assisting in Georgia’s recount of the 2020 election ballots.
Susan Voyles is a veteran Georgia elections poll manager who submitted a sworn affidavit in a Trump campaign lawsuit against Georgia’s Secretary of State. She recounts some of the most significant improprieties she witnessed participating in the recount of Georgia’s election, which Joe Biden supposedly won by around 13,000 votes.
Voyles, who has done elections work for twenty years, describes counting an unusual “pristine” batch of absentee ballots that were cast 98% for Joe Biden. She states that the packaging containing these absentee ballots was unlabeled by the Secretary of State.
“We came to one batch- it was surprising, it was stark- having done this for years, I’m very familiar with how the ballots work, how they fold, how they feel, their general appearance- these ballots appeared as though the first one had been bubbled in by a person and all of them were replicated, exactly the same.
We were further alarmed that in our count 98% of these ballots were for Joseph R. Biden. Two were for Donald Trump.
That’s a very odd count. My coworker agreed with me that there was something very unusual about these ballots.”
Voyles even suspects that the unusual ballots she counted in the recount were filled out with a marking device.
“Every single ballot was absolutely identical, and they appeared to be printed with some sort of marking device.”
Unfortunately, it’s very difficult for elections integrity monitors to verify the veracity of these supposedly pristine absentee ballots. They’ve been separated from the envelopes that contain the supposed legal information of the voters that cast them, and they can’t be reunited with them.
Globalism3 days ago
Hungarian PM Orbán: George Soros is “One of the Most Corrupt People in the World”
Immigration2 days ago
BOMBSHELL: President Trump May Sign Executive Order to End Birthright Citizenship Before First Term Ends
Around The World4 days ago
South Australia Police: You Cannot Leave Your House to Walk the Dog or Exercise
Congress3 days ago
Marjorie Taylor Greene Brutalizes Ilhan Omar in Devastating Tweets Over Her Illicit Brother Marriage
Big League Economics3 days ago
VIDEO: A Tired-Looking Hillary Clinton Shills for ‘The Great Reset’ Agenda at Globalist Forum
Campaign 20204 days ago
THE KRAKENING: Trump Attorney Sidney Powell Reveals Stunning Fraud Allegations in Press Conference
Campaign 20204 days ago
EXPLOITATION: Whistleblower Details Illegal Ballot Harvesting of Disabled Voters in Wisconsin Group Homes
Big League Guns4 days ago
Biden Deputy Chief of Staff Proposed Mandatory Confiscation of “Assault Weapons” as Beto Campaign Manager