Connect with us

The Swamp

Even Democrats Don’t Believe Michael Avenatti’s Claim Of A Third Accuser

Published

on

Top-ranking Democrats are keeping their distance from Michael Avenatti, the creepy porn lawyer whose representation of Stormy Daniels might spawn his own dark-horse bid for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.

The prospective candidate is claiming that a third woman has some information about alleged drunken antics undertaken by adolescent Brett Kavanaugh and his Georgetown Prep classmate, writer Mark Judge. But Democrats are not pouncing on Avenatti’s claims.

Does this mean the Avenatti Era in left-wing media — a creation of CNN — is coming to an end because Avenatti has no credibility left, even with his own Resistance comrades? Or are Democrats just ticked off that Avenatti wants to run against them for president, and is even picking up inexplicably straight-faced New Hampshire speculation from the Associated Press?

Trending: Arizona House Passes Law to Nullify Biden’s Federal Gun Control

Politico reports:

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Avenatti has tweeted that his client is a “woman with credible information” concerning “the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs” by Kavanaugh and his longtime friend Mark Judge, whom Ford has identified as the third person in the room during the alleged assault against her. But Democratic senators are treading lightly on the claims from Avenatti, who also represents Trump accuser Stormy Daniels and is weighing a presidential run.

“You know I never have no comment, but I have no comment about Michael Avenatti,” Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) said.

“Until we have more information, there’s not much that anyone can do with that,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), like Sanders a member of Schumer’s leadership team and leading 2020 presidential contender, said of Avenatti’s client.

“But since there are two women who have come forward – they have made credible claims, they have made their names public – it now means that the FBI should be conducting a full investigation” into both Ford and Ramirez’s allegations, Warren added.

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), who’s become one of the Judiciary panel’s most vocal Democrats on sexual misconduct issues, delivered blunt advice to Avenatti: “If he has something to introduce, he should do it now. I haven’t had any contact with him.'”

Politico passage ends

The Swamp

Whistleblower Who Placed Bill Clinton at Epstein’s Pedo Island Now Cooperating with Ghislane Maxwell Investigation

Sweating, Bill?

Published

on

A longtime Bill Clinton aide who came forward with shocking claims that the former President had visited Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous “pedophile island” in the early 2000’s, is now cooperating with federal authorities who continue to investigate Ghislane Maxwell during her ongoing sex trafficking trial, Big League Politics has learned.

In recent weeks, Doug Band has spoken to two criminal investigators working on the Southern District of New York’s prosecution of Maxwell.

Doug Band was the third witness to specifically allege that Clinton had visited the island of Little Saint James, and the first personally connected to the powerful Democrat. Two other witnesses have alleged seeing Clinton on Epstein’s island, including one Epstein trafficking victim and a handyman who was employed by the pedophile oligarch on the island. Band asserted in an interview with Vanity Fair that Clinton visited the infamous sex trafficking island in January of 2003, shortly after a “charitable” trip to Africa with Epstein.

Band started working in the Clinton White House in 1995, only leaving the neoliberal dynasty’s orbit in 2012. It’s possible that the SDNY investigators may have asked Band about Clinton’s personal connections with Epstein and his international pedophile ring, although Clinton had a relationship with Maxwell that lasted for decades- even after Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 solicitation of underage prostitution conviction.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Maxwell’s upcoming sex crimes trial may prove to further enlighten Epstein’s sex trafficking operation, serving as the trial that the mysteriously deceased Democrat megadonor never had. Clinton has strenuously denied ever visiting Little Saint James, even as three different credible witnesses with personal connections to either himself or Epstein say he traveled there.


Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending