Connect with us

Congress

FLASHBACK: Nadler Was Repeatedly ‘Trumped’ by DJT in 1990’s Real-Estate Feud

The House Judiciary Committee Chairman clearly has a bone to pick with the President.

Published

on

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) is on the war path against President Trump, abusing his authority at the helm of the House Judiciary Committee to hold Attorney General Bill Barr in contempt for following the law, and claiming a non-existent “constitutional crisis” is occurring within the Trump administration.

“We’ve talked for a long time about approaching a constitutional crisis. We are now in it,” Nadler said to reporters on Wednesday.

While Nadler likes to advertise himself as a steward of the public trust, his motivations to take Trump down may be far more self-serving than he is willing to admit considering their long-running feud going back to the 1990s.

Trending: WATCH: Black Lives Matter Protestors Overwhelmed by Counter-Demonstrators in Springfield, Oregon

In 1995, the New York Times reported that Rep. Nadler passed legislation helping Trump expand his real estate empire in Manhattan, unbeknownst to the clueless lawmaker:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A Congressman who opposes his Riverside South proposal, Representative Jerrold Nadler of the West Side, threw a Federal wrench right into the plan’s soft middle this week. So Mr. Trump says he is thrilled, contending that it will now be easier and cheaper to develop the project.

“Jerry Nadler fell right into my trap,” the adaptable builder said yesterday in an interview…

The plan was that if the highway was moved, Mr. Trump could build a waterfront park above it with direct access to the water, adjacent to his buildings. In return, the civic groups dropped their opposition to Riverside South, withdrew a potentially damaging lawsuit and made a pact to work with the often bedeviling Mr. Trump.

From the beginning, though, there was this problem: the stretch of the West Side Highway between 57th and 72d streets was so deteriorated that state and city authorities said it needed immediate repair. It had a $72 million federally financed renovation, completed in December. That, in turn, raised a question of whether government would deliberately tear down a newly revamped roadway and spend another pot of Federal money to move it a few yards away. Assuming the money was forthcoming…

Mr. Trump says he knew all along that the highway was staying right where it is, which, if true, means that he neutralized opposition to his plan four years ago by making a promise that he figured he would not have to keep…

At the same time, though, even as he expressed his great gratitude to Mr. Nadler, Mr. Trump could not contain his anger toward the Congressman, saying Mr. Nadler was “doing this for publicity” and accusing him of peddling “total nonsense.” Why the disaffection if Mr. Nadler did him such a favor? “Because it’s better for me, but it’s worse for the civics and the city,” Mr. Trump said.

“You know, this is an opportunity to get something done in New York,” he added, noting that the city’s fondness for turning developments that should take a few years to carry out into developments that span decades.

The feud only worsened from there, as Nadler grew more angry after being publicly bamboozled by Trump. Little did he know that getting outfoxed by Trump would come to define his entire career in public office.

Three years later, the President made a fool of Nadler yet again as Nadler was forced to vote ‘yes’ on legislation that would personally enrich Trump. The Observer reported in 1998:

Representative Jerrold Nadler may or may not have snarled his archenemy’s surname as he snapped his cell phone shut on May 22, but he certainly had good cause to toss a few choice epithets in the developer’s direction. Minutes later, the House of Representatives would vote on a $200-billion Federal transportation bill, and the Democratic Congressman for the Upper West Side had been preparing to cast a “Yea” when a frantic aide called with a disconcerting piece of news.

The aide was skimming through the voluminous bill’s fine print when he made a startling discovery. In the latest twist to a bitter and intensely personal feud between Mr. Nadler and Donald Trump, the developer and his allies had somehow smuggled into the bill $6 million in Federal funds for a key element of the Trump Place project, or the Mega-Development Formerly Known as Riverside South…

Mr. Trump and his supporters had won a substantial chunk of Federal change toward the mega-development-all without the knowledge of Mr. Nadler, whose district will be radically transformed by the mammoth project.

“Trump got $6 million in the dead of night when no one knew anything about it,” an enraged Mr. Nadler told The Observer . “The final agreement was reached at 3 in the morning.”

(Mr. Trump may have scored more than $6 million: According to supporters, the bill allots an additional $15 million toward future design costs; Mr. Nadler was uncertain of the total.)

Characteristically, Mr. Trump downplayed his victory. “There were so many people on our side, beyond Donald Trump, that it wasn’t really very hard,” Mr. Trump said. “The chips all seemed to fall right.”

Nadler, by grossly overreaching as House Judiciary Committee Chairman to keep the Russia collusion hoax going a little while longer, is yet again falling into another one of Trump’s traps.

The belligerent leftist Congressman will be lucky to leave his privileged federal position with a single shred of dignity by the time President Trump is done with him.

Congress

FLASHBACK: Three Recent Supreme Court Justices Were Confirmed Within 45 Days

There’s ample precedent for a quick confirmation.

Published

on

There are 45 days until the November 3rd presidential election, and there’s ample precedent for an expedited confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice in such a timeframe following a vacancy.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg died on Friday, setting up a possible contentious confirmation process to fill her seat. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is pledging that a tentative Trump administration nominee for the position will receive a vote on the Senate floor, despite outrage and indignation on the part of progressives falsely maintaining that McConnell is breaking precedent he set by refusing to confirm Merrick Garland. President Obama tried to get Garland confirmed when the opposing party controlled the Senate, a divided government that does not exist in 2020.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg herself was formally nominated by President Clinton on June 22nd, 1993. Her confirmation process began on July 20th, and she was confirmed on August 3rd, with a total of 42 days elapsing between her nomination and confirmation.

John Paul Stevens’ nomination was advanced and confirmed in a speedy 19 days, and Sandra Day O’Connor was confirmed in 1981 in a total of 33 days.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In fact, every single Supreme Court nomination of the past 45 years was nominated and voted upon within a shorter duration of the time remaining in Donald Trump’s first presidential term.

There’s actually wide precedent for nominating and confirming a Supreme Court justice within the confines of President Trump’s first term, and Democrats are being untruthful or erroneous to suggest otherwise.

McConnell is beginning initial work to advance confirmation hearings, with potential liberal Republicans such as Mitt Romney, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski presenting themselves as possible holdouts. It is possible to approve a judge with 50 votes in the Senate and a Vice Presidential tiebreaker.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending