Connect with us

Deep State

FLASHBACK: Obama Administration Pressured Ukraine to Drop Investigation of George Soros Group in 2016

The real Ukraine scandal involves the Democrats.

Published

on

As House Democrats promulgate a fake Ukrainian crisis involving President Donald Trump, the evidence shows that members of the Obama administration are the ones who really ought to be investigated.

Investigative journalist John Solomon revealed earlier this year how the Obama administration used its power to coerce Ukraine into dropping an investigation of a George Soros front group in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election.

Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, who recently testified against President Trump before Congress, reportedly handed Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuri Lutsenko a list of individuals who should not be prosecuted. It included the leader of the Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC), which is a Soros-backed front group that was being investigated for the misappropriation of U.S. funds.

Trending: GOP Establishment Threatens President Trump with Impeachment Unless He Denies Election Fraud

“At the time, Ms. Ambassador thought our interviews of the Ukrainian citizens, of the Ukrainian civil servants who were frequent visitors in the U.S. Embassy, could cast a shadow on that anti-corruption policy,” Lutsenko said.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“We ran right into a buzzsaw and we got bloodied,” a senior Ukrainian official said to Solomon about the entire affair.

Obama’s state department claimed that they were protecting a group that was promoting anti-corruption reforms, and denies any nefarious agenda behind their policy to protect the group. However, they did admit the peculiarity of the request.

“We’re not normally in the business of telling a country’s police force who they can and can’t pursue, unless it involves an American citizen we think is wrongly accused,” an official said.

The Obama administration’s policies were ultimately successful in protecting AntAC, which remains active to this day and continues to agitate on behalf of Soros in the Ukraine.

Solomon also noted that the Obama administration outsourced federal work to Soros groups. After the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) announced their Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative to supposedly root out corruption throughout the world, the FBI, DOJ and State Department brought Soros-backed groups on board as their partner.

AntAC has received $1 million of its $1.7 million annual budget through federal welfare. They also receive $290,000 annually from Soros’s International Renaissance Foundation. This is no secret collaboration, at least to observers in Ukraine. Prominent DOJ officials and FBI agents have regularly appeared at conferences and events sponsored by Soros.

The FBI admits that Karen Greenaway, who once worked as the FBI’s supervisor in charge of international fraud cases and played a key role in the railroading of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, had intimate ties to the AntAC group while she was working with the bureau.

“In furtherance of the FBI’s mission and in the course of their duties, FBI employees routinely travel and participated in public forums in an official capacity. At a minimum, all such travel and speaking engagements are authorized by the employee’s direct supervisor and can receive further authorization all the way up to the relevant division head, along with an ethics official determination,” they said.

After her retirement from the FBI, Greenaway was put on the supervisory board of AntAC. The Obama administration’s ties to Soros and their undue influence in Ukraine is the real scandal, while President Trump’s non-existent quid pro quo is little more than fake news meant to fuel an unprecedented witch hunt.

Deep State

Source: Feds are Purging National Guard Members Based on Ties to NRA, TPUSA, Patriotic Groups

It’s unclear if there’s any due process.

Published

on

According to an alleged White House source, the feds are purging National Guard members based on their association with conservative patriotic groups such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) or Turning Point USA (TPUSA).

The extreme paranoia within the deep state has been taken to a new level following the U.S. Capitol siege on Jan. 6. The feds have succumbed to conspiracy theories that there are disloyal ranks within the military who must be purged and cannot be trusted to protect President-imposed Joe Biden.

Journalist Jack Posobiec of the One America News Network made the announcement in a tweet:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The FBI has released a baseless report, countering intelligence from the Pentagon, that QAnon supporters are planning to “infiltrate” the National Guard during inauguration. This irresponsible propaganda from the FBI has fueled the police state in Washington D.C.:

 

The Capitol has been turned into an occupied military zone as the America transitions back to establishment rule:

Big League Politics has reported on the fake news that Trump supporters were planning armed demonstrations in Washington D.C. and elsewhere during Biden’s inauguration:

Mainstream media figures have claimed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is warning of imminent “armed protests” at every state capitol in the country on January 20th, the day on which Joe Biden is slated to be inaugurated as President…

In a development seeming to contradict with claims of imminent armed marches on state capitols, the special agent in charge of the FBI Boston office revealed that the agency had no reason to believe a threat of criminal activity was at hand in the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island.

We are currently not in receipt of any credible information regarding violent activity in or around the capitol buildings, or anywhere else for that matter, connected to the events of Jan. 6 or the upcoming inauguration,” said Special Agent in Charge Joseph R. Bonavolonta.

Armed protests occasionally happen- almost always peacefully- in states with pro-Second Amendment gun laws. But it’s all but impossible to imagine states such as New Jersey, Massachusetts and New York legally allowing armed protests, with open carry being all but outright illegal.

Some protests supposedly planned at state capitols are being organized by individuals affiliated with “Boogaloo” subculture, a juvenile anarchist movement that largely opposes President Trump, let alone supports election protests. Thin sourcing for the legitimacy of these events seems to rely on little more than amateuristic online fliers, as opposed to real organization and permit processing usually required for protest events at sensitive areas such as state capitols.

The feds are looking to inflame tensions even further to justify their unconstitutional crackdown after Biden seizes power. America is hanging by a thread, and the globalists are pulling out all the stops to destroy the nation for good.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending