Rants
GRASSLEY ANGRY: FBI Ignores His Deadline For Answers On Whistleblower Raid
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has brazenly ignored Iowa Republican senator Chuck Grassley’s demand for information about the FBI’s raid on Uranium One whistleblower Nate Cain.
Grassley, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, set a firm deadline of December 12 for the FBI to respond. Inspector general Michael Horowitz, who has been a so-so figure in all of this melodrama, also did not respond to Grassley.
“We have not yet received answers to the chairman’s questions on this matter,” said a Grassley committee staffer.
This is not good, because whistleblowers are being treated horribly, and Grassley should not be disrespected. The Iowa senator is one of the few bulwarks in the Republican Party fighting for something, anything, during this period of unprecedented left-wing assault on our Republic.
Trending: HOWLEY: Here’s The Full Story of How Obama, Hillary and Brennan Carried Out The Crime of the Century
I reported for Big League Politics:
Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa wants answers pertaining to the FBI’s raid on the home of a Uranium One whistleblower.
Robert Mueller’s role in the Uranium One scandal is a big deal as the Deep State War players are scrambling for ground in this frenzied final period of the Russia Witch Hunt. Perhaps former FBI director Mueller’s embedded apparatchiks at the Bureau are trying to tie up a few loose ends of their own.
Newsmax reports: “Grassley, R-Iowa, has sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray and to the Department of Justice’s internal watchdog, seeking more details on the raid of Dennis Nathan Cain in Maryland on Nov. 16, giving them until Dec. 12 to respond, reports Fox News. Cain’s attorney, Michael Socarras, told The Daily Caller after 16 FBI agents raided the home on Nov. 19 that the agent who led the raid accused Cain of being in possession of stolen federal property.”
As special counsel Robert Mueller comes under scrutiny for his role in the Uranium One scandal — with the FBI raiding a Uranium One whistleblower’s house — the number of criminal complaints, lawsuits or investigations into his potentially criminal conduct is growing. That number has reached at least four.
Let’s walk through some of our coverage of the Robert Mueller investigation, which we have been digging into since Mueller’s appointment in May 2017, a month after our inception. (READ: An Army of FBI Whistleblowers Are Ready To Testify Against Mueller).
- Dr. Jerome Corsi has filed a criminal complaint against Robert Mueller for trying to coerce him to lie
Writer Dr. Jerome Corsi appeared on my show to discuss his criminal complaint against Robert Mueller, and how Mueller covered up evidence of Hillary Clinton law-breaking and of the Democratic National Committee “hack” actually being an inside leak. Corsi said that he believes murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was the Wikileaks leaker. Corsi was targeted for destruction by Mueller but he refuses to back down.
Jerome Corsi’s criminal complaint against Mueller is available online and can be READ HERE.
2. Mueller is being investigated by Tennessee Bureau of Investigation for allegedly framing a right-wing man on a gun charge
As I first reported, the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation confirms on official letterhead that a criminal complaint regarding Mueller’s conduct as FBI director is stored in an investigative case file at the Bureau. The Department’s policy is not to release this information in the course of an investigation.
Big League Politics has reviewed police audio of a conversation between Walter Fitzpatrick, witness in the case against Mueller, and TBI special agents Jerry Spoon and Mark Irwin, plus another TBI officer.
Fitzpatrick describes his claim that Darren Huff was fraudulently prosecuted by Mueller’s FBI for the crime of “carrying a firearm in interstate commerce with the intent to use it in a civil disorder” in a supposed right-wing plot in 2010 to take over a courthouse in Monroe County. Huff served time in solitary confinement, and did not wish to be quoted in this report.
Fitzpatrick and others have presented evidence that Darren Huff never possessed a firearm at the location or in the matter alleged by authorities, and that there was no plot to take over a courthouse.
Huff’s lack of firearm, if confirmed by investigators, shapes the case against Mueller for willful misconduct by law enforcement.
3. Mueller Is Getting Sued By A Grand Jury Witness
Mueller has a pretty big headache on his hands.
Fox News’ Bill Mears reported:
“A federal appeals court announced Friday that it would hold a closed oral argument session on Dec. 14, to address a lawsuit apparently filed against Special Counsel Robert Mueller by an unidentified grand jury witness.
Much of the detail in the case remains under seal, and there has been intense speculation in the legal and political communities over the identity of the mystery appellant.
Speculation in some media was that President Trump himself had filed the lawsuit back in August, but his attorney denied it.
The suit could be related to a possible subpoena for the witness to appear before the federal grand jury empaneled by Mueller, who is looking into a range of issues, including the extent of Russia interference in the 2016 election.”
4. Mueller Stands Accused of Treason
Tim Brown reported for Freedom Outpost that “there is a criminal complaint of treason against Mueller filed by retired Commander Walter Fitzpatrick, the same citizen issuing the third complaint, on July 26, 2017. Mueller’s corrupt is so deep and so vast, one wonders how he can even be considered reliable in DC, unless one knows just how corrupt DC truly is.”
Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?
Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.
Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
