Connect with us

Culture

GROSS: Democrats Block Infanticide Ban In Senate, 2020ers Lead The Way

Published

on

The US Senate has voted against protection of babies born after a botched abortion – leaving them to die alone on the table.

In a 53-44 vote tonight, the Senate couldn’t surpass the Democratic led filibuster that was prohibiting a vote on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivor Protection Act. The 60 votes needed to end the filibuster were blocked by Senate Democrats, with every Republican Senator present voting to move forward with the bill.

After calling on Congress to make infanticide illegal at his State of the Union Address, President Trump expressed his disappointment with the Senate.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Ending the filibuster would allow the Senate to vote on the actual bill, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivor Protection Act. If passed, the bill would “prohibit a health care practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion.”

Not surprisingly, every Democratic Senator running for President in 2020, voted not to end the filibuster. Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand and Bernie Sanders, all voted in favor of allowing infanticide to be legal.

Wondering if your Senator is opposed to killing infants right after they are born? Here’s a roll call of the votes:

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00027#state

Culture

Left-Wing Scholar Pushes to Censor Social Media Accounts Opposing Child Sex Trafficking by Tying Them to QAnon Movement

This scholar is doing PR for predators.

Published

on

Academic scholar Marc-André Argentino of the Global Network on Extremism & Technology is attempting to get social media accounts that are raising awareness of child sex trafficking thrown off of social media by tying them to the controversial QAnon movement.

Argentino is demonizing 114 groups that are raising awareness of child sex trafficking that he wants thrown off of social media because he claims they are affiliated with QAnon:

Argentino made it clear that he is concerned with protecting potential pedophiles from repercussions from their predatory actions against children:

He posted that he will be working on demonizing Christian, pro-life groups that are focused on stopping child sex trafficking next:

Darren Beattie of Revolver pointed out the agenda behind Argentino’s work. Argentino is aggressively demonizing activists who are raising awareness about the exploitation of children.

Big League Politics has reported on how establishment politicians from both major political parties have demonized the QAnon movement in an attempt to deflect from the depravity that they are engaging in behind the scenes:

Several Congressmen are going to war with the QAnon conspiracy theory.

On August 25, 2020, Republican Congressman Denver Riggleman and Democrat Congressman Tom Malinowski introduce a resolution to condemn the conspiracy movement and demand that law enforcement crack down on criminal activity that its supporters carry out.

Riggleman tweeted “QAnon and the conspiracy theories it promotes are a danger and a threat that has no place in our country’s politics. I condemn this movement and urge all Americans to join me in taking this step to exclude them and other extreme conspiracy theories from the national discourse.

The resolution describes QAnon as one of the “fringe political conspiracy theories” that authorities believe is likely to incite violence.

With several Republican candidates who have allegedly supported QAnon in the past now potentially making their way to Congress, establishment gatekeepers in both parties are becoming jittery.

Whether or not such conspiracies have validity is for curious Americans to decide through their own investigation.

The real question we should be asking is why a Republican like Riggleman is wasting his time trying to introduce a resolution with a Democrat?

After all, this is a time when there’s an existential threat of radical leftists tearing up the streets across the nation. This merits a full-fledged response from the GOP. Focusing on anything else is a complete waste of time and political capital.

 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending