Connect with us

News

How Red China is Influencing North Carolina Education

Published

on

The extent to which China has spread its influence into American institutions of higher learning has been one of the biggest stories in recent years.

In recent years, a number of academics and researchers have been charged for their connections to the Chinese government.

Of the most high-profile cases of American academics colluding with China, the case of Charles Lieber has caught national attention. Lieber, the chair of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, was charged and indicted on June 9 for making false statements to federal authorities concerning his involvement in China’s Thousand Talents Program.

Trending: Portland ANTIFA Riots Continue in Biden’s Presidency as Thugs Terrorize Businesses, Citizens in Leftist Pogrom

In early June, an investigation by the National Institute of Health led to 54 firings and resignations. The investigation was launched in 2018. According to Michael Lauer, NIH’s head of extramural research, 93 percent of those cases involved undisclosed funding of Chinese origin.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

These investigations have been going on for a while, but the Wuhan virus outbreak has made these issues prominent. The House Oversight and Reform Committee was in the process of investigating Wuhan virus propaganda campaigns by China and has already stepped up its efforts in early May. Republican leaders sent U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos a letter which demanded information regarding the Chinese Communist Party’s investment in American universities as a means of expanding its influence.

The establishment of Confucius Institutes in 2004 has allowed the CCP to enter institutes of higher education in the U.S. They have expanded across the world by providing language courses and similar cultural material that tends to downplay the human rights abuses and overall history of suppression the Chinese government has been involved during the last century.

Although the C.I.’s offerings appear harmless, they are actually ran by the Hanban, an entity that receives funding and tutelage from the Chinese government’s Ministry of Education. The Hanban also determines the compensation and screening process for those who end up becoming teachers for these institutes.

According to a 2017 report by the National Association of Scholars, the C.I.s were described as “weapons of soft power” which comply with Chinese law, avoid mentioning Chinese political history and human rights abuses, implement China’s restrictions on free speech, and “portray Taiwan and Tibet as undisputed territories of China.”

According to North State Journal, “As of May, there are around 81 C.I.’s operating in the United States and one still operating in North Carolina — The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.”

UNC Charlotte started running back in 2017. The institute in question was running in Pfeiffer University, but shut its doors in 2016 and then moved to UNC Charlotte.

Buffie Stephens, director of issues management and external media relations at UNC Charlotte, told North State Journal that the C.I. is “governed by a board of directors that is chaired by the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences.” In addition, he noted that the institute has a campus advisory council compromised of UNC Charlotte faculty and staff.

“UNC Charlotte controls all curriculum and other academic matters at the university, and the C.I. does not offer any for-credit classes,” Stephens said in an email message with North State Journal.

“Teaching assistants in the C.I. are not instructors of record at the university,” Stephens commented. “They work under the direction of UNC Charlotte faculty in our classrooms — providing services such as being conversation partners — and work under the oversight of teachers in K-12 schools, governed by those schools. They also help with cultural events.”

When questioned about how UNC Charlotte receives Hanban funding, Stephens recounted that the Hanban funded the creation of the institute with “start-up expenses of $150,000” back in 2017. In 2018, the Hanban allocated an additional $70,000 in operating support and an “additional $30,000 to support K-12 schools directly.”

According to Stephens, the C.I. was the recipient of an additional $107,150 in operating support and another $40,000 to aid K-12 schools directly back in 2019.

“UNC Charlotte has not received more than $150,000 of support from Hanban in any given year. Consistent with Section 117 of the Higher Education Act, UNC Charlotte reports to the federal government all gifts from or contracts with a foreign source valued at $250,000 or more in a year,” Stephens commented.

The rise of China is one of the largest political questions of our time.

To curb Chinese influence, the U.S. will need to shutdown all Confucius Institutes within its borders.

Big League Guns

Merrick Garland Suggests that Getting Rid of Lawsuit Protections is Not a Second Amendment Violation

Garland as AG will be a disaster for the right to bear arms.

Published

on

If Merrick Garland is nominated as Attorney General, the Second Amendment is in big trouble.

Based on his comments at a Senate hearing on February 22, 2021, Garland made a suggestion that the repeal of lawsuit protections for gun manufacturers is not unconstitutional. 

AWR Hawkins of Breitbart News reminded his readers that President Joe Biden campaigned on a platform of repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shielded lawful gun manufacturers from lawsuits.

In a previous Breitbart News report, Biden spoke at an MSNBC forum in 2019 alongside gun control organizations such as March for Our Lives where he expressed his support for gun manufacturers to be subject to lawsuits.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

At the speech, Biden suggested that the PLCC be repealed. He declared, “No other outfit in history has gotten this kind of protection” and asserted that the legal actions would bring about “change overnight.”

In a subsequent occasion on February 7, 2020, Breitbart News covered Biden’s remarks to a New Hampshire crowd, in which he stated that it was a “mistake” to shield firearms manufacturers from lawsuits. He continued, “The first thing I’m going to do as president is work to get rid of that.” 

Later that month, Breitbart News recalled how Biden called out gun manufacturers at a South Carolina rally and boasted, “I’m going to take you down.”

According to a report by The Salt Lake Tribune, Utah Senator Mike Lee asked Garland about his views on removing protections for gun manufacturers. Garland responded, “I have not thought myself deeply about this. I don’t think it raises a Second Amendment issue.”

When he was questioned if he is in favor of Biden’s plans to ban so-called “assault weapons”, Garland responded, “Where there is room under the law for the president’s policies to be pursued, then I think the president is entitled to pursue them.”

Biden’s track record as a gun control proponent is well-documented. From his support of gun-free zones at schools to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, Biden is Gun Control Inc.’s guy. With Democrats in control of the House and the Senate, there will most certainly be attempts to ram gun control down our throats. If they can’t beat us legislatively, they will most certainly use the courts to undermine the Second Amendment. Pro-gun organizations should be ready to lawyer up and use whatever means possible to keep courts from destroying our rights.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending