Connect with us

Culture

INTERVIEW: Activist Shirley Husar Says This Is “Switch Bitch 2” For Omarosa

Published

on

Big League Politics spoke with the woman who announced Donald J. Trump’s nomination from the floor of the Republican Convention for the state of California, who is also the only Black Grassroots Republican to meet with Omarosa Manigault at the White House “North”.

“What she is doing is diving the Black Community and we don’t really need that right now, ” said Shirley Husar, who has been active in Republican politics since 1977. “She gave poverty pimps access to the President, and never took care of us,” Husar told Big League Politics.

“I am the only grassroots activist to have to meet with Omorosa. I call her the switch bitch, because she wrote the book, Switch Bitch.   This latest attack against Trump, who gave her everything, is Switch Bitch 2.  She lied to me and denied Black grassroots from being at the table. Omarosa did that. She set the President up for failure,” Husar, the founder of Urban Game Changers said.

Trending: Grassroots Leaders Send Final Warning to GOP Establishment: Rejecting Trump Means Death of Republican Party

“We all tried to reach her.  She never returned our calls,” she said. “Omarosa does switch it on and off, just like she wrote in the book,” she said.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“At first Omarosa wanted to change the Urban community, that is what she told me, but it didn’t work out for her that way and I know why,” Husar said.

Husar announcing the Nomination of Donald J. Trump, Cleveland, OH at the 2016 RNC Convention

“Trump chose her because of the reality TV angle, and some of us didn’t like her then, but he is loyal.  In the end, she is about money and her brand. She didn’t have relationships with any black activists. I am the only person she met at the White House.  Look it up in the  LA Times,”she said.

LA TIMES ARTICLE

“She has two personalities- I have seen her turn on and then off.  I befriended her because of Trump and she said she wanted to see something happen for African Americans. Trump said he wanted to meet with us.  We were first on his mind.  Instead of honoring the delegation, before the red pill, or walk away and whatever she called people who don’t support the President- she could have asked us to meet with President Trump.   I am angry about people like Omarosa who don’t acknowledge us- we have been here a long time,” she said.

“I am street activist. I meet with the hardest cases.   I have walked that walk. Our family disowned us and we put ourselves out for Trump.  Omarosa turned her back on us,” Husar said.

“She picked the Congressional Black Caucus to meet with President Trump- and that was a disaster and embarrassing. Omarosa didn’t give me a seat at the table to talk about policies that would affect the people I talked to and work with out there, the black people with pain in their hearts,’ said Huser to Big League Politics.

“Omarosa set Trump up with people who don’t even support him and wanted to only cause him harm. She worked with the Clintons and was still good friends with them,” Husar said.

“We were taught to rise.  Unfortunately, when we had the opportunity to really rise as Blacks in America, Omarosa came out with Slick Bitch 2 book, because she didn’t do her job and she wants some money. I am mad,” she said.

You can watch her here:

Free Speech

Does the Arizona Constitution Provide Means for Lawmakers to Crack Down on Big Tech Censorship?

Does the Arizona Constitution provide protections from Big Tech?

Published

on

The Arizona Constitution provides stronger protections for freedom of speech than the First Amendment does, potentially providing legislative solutions to Big Tech censorship in the state at a moment where political censorship is more pervasive than ever.

Article 2 Section 6, Arizona Constitution states that “Every person may freely speak, write, and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. “

This differs greatly from the federal constitution in that it doesn’t limit the powers of a legislature to restrict freedom of speech. The US Constitution identifies “Congress” as the body it’s restricting from making a law abridging the freedom of speech.

The speech rights established by the Arizona Constitution are thus expressed positively; recognizing a right belonging to the people, as opposed to negating an infringement of said right.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Quite obviously, the Arizona Constitution was written in an 1910, an era in which the internet would’ve been just as inconceivable as it was in 1789.

In a 2019 Arizona Supreme Court case, the state’s highest court recognized in a 4-3 judgement that the Arizona Constitution provided greater protections than the federal constitution. The case recognized that violations of the First Amendment would represent de facto violations of the

It’s not outside the realm of possibility that the Arizona Attorney General, or state legislature, could hold Big Tech oligarchs to account for violating the Article 2 Section 6 rights of Arizona citizens- especially in a context the major platforms are collectively adjudicated to be acting as a trust in order to suppress competition and silence lawful speech.

Three Arizona legislators called upon Attorney General Mark Brnovich to begin an antitrust investigation into Big Tech oligarchs following the coordinated deplatforming operation against Parler, in which both Amazon and Apple colluded to restrict the free speech platform from the internet.

In an era where the overwhelming majority of free speech is communicated online, the censorious actions of Big Tech very plausibly represent an assault of the right of free expression guaranteed in the Arizona Constitution. Both chambers of Arizona’s legislature remain Republican, even as the state has become purple, and action against Big Tech censorship on the state level could become a real possibility in the coming years.


Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending