Connect with us

Hollywood

Jussie Smollett May Have Lied to FBI, Tried to Frame Innocents for Hoax

Smollett may have been willing to send innocent people to prison for his hate hoax.

Published

on

The criminal dimensions of Jussie Smollett’s all-but-guaranteed hate hoax may expand farther beyond what’s already largely speculated, according to reporting from TMZ Monday.

Smollett may have employed the two Nigerian brothers believed to have carried out the fake attack at his bidding to send himself an almost comically fake ‘hate’ letter weeks ago.

The letter contained rhetoric similar to what Smollett claims his attackers abused him with, threatening his life and calling him a “black f**.”

Trending: OUTRAGEOUS: Milwaukee Man Who was Defending His Home from a Leftist Mob is Arrested

The FBI has been investigating the letter’s source, and if it’s found to be just as fake as the alleyway ambush, the penalties Smollett will face could be severe. Mail fraud is a federal crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Police who raided the home of the Osundairo brothers(said to the Smollett’s accomplices in staging the hoax) located cut-out magazines, potentially used in creating the magazine-letter hate mail that Smollett received.

In an even more disturbing development, it seems Smollett may have tried to take advantage of what he saw as an opportunity to frame completely innocent people for the hoax.

The Empire actor had told police he’d be willing to sign off on criminal complaints against the two ‘suspects’ when they were in custody. Yet when Smollett found out that police arrested the Osundairo brothers in regards to the incident, he declined to pursue charges, as he had earlier indicated he’d be willing to.

This change of heart suggests that Smollett would have been willing to press charges against hypothetical individuals arrested by Chicago police in connection to the attack. With the incident appearing almost certainly to be a hoax, Smollett would’ve been enabling the criminal prosecution of individuals who were completely blameless.

Smollett’s hoax can’t be simply written off as the grotesque stunt of a publicity seeker, if Chicago’s system of justice wants to retain any semblance of credibility in the eyes of the more than 100,000 Trump supporters who live in the city.

Smollett should face serious felony charges, and a prison sentence, upon the full exposure of his pathetic hate hoax.

Hollywood

Michelle Obama’s Influence Over Netflix Led to Release of Pro-Pedo Movie ‘Cuties’

Published

on

Netflix is under fire for distributing the pro-pedo flick “Cuties” over its streaming video service. The movie “Cuties” is about an 11-year-old girl who discovers her sexuality while twerking.

“Cuties” has been described by its apologists as a triumph of diversity and womanhood. It should come as no surprise that this content is getting distributed as former first lady Michelle Obama is an influential producer with Netflix.

Big League Politics reported three years ago on how the Obamas were using Netflix to distribute their political propaganda and promote their social agenda after leaving the White House:

Former President Barack Obama is currently in advance negotiations with Netflix to produce a series of shows through them. This will give the former President easy access into the living rooms of virtually every American in order to spread whatever propaganda he wants.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The deal would pay both the former President, and his wife Michelle to provide exclusive content to the over 118 million Netflix subscribers around the world. It is unclear of the exact content that would be produced, but after looking at other content produced by Netflix, the shows being highly political wouldn’t be surprising.

After receiving massive investments totaling over $40 million from George Soros in 2015 and 2016, the content on the streaming service began to shift and include originally produced content with political agendas.

One show they released was titled “Dear White People,” and was extremely racially charged, as the name implies. They also released a show featuring Katie Couric that explores “gender identity,” while at the same time editing a portion of an old episode of Bill Nye the Science Guy, where Nye makes the claim that there are only two genders.

With former President Obama already going against the norm for other Presidents by attacking the current President, it’s clear that Obama is okay with getting divisively political. It would not be surprising to see his show used as a political weapon of the left.

Making matters even worse, Russia-gate villain and former national security advisor Susan Rice also sits on the Netflix board.

It should come as no surprise that Michelle is completely silent with regards to “Cuties.” This is the type of filth that her family is personally invested in promoting throughout the West. Her husband is the founder of ISIS, as President Trump so eloquently put it, after all.

Big League Politics has reported on how “Cuties” is mainstreaming child pornography and the sexualization of kids:

A Netflix film set to debut on Sept. 9 will feature profile an 11-year-old girl who joins a twerking dance crew to “explore her femininity.”

The film, called “Cuties,” will provide fodder for pedophiles and sexual deviants the world over. The description of the perverse movie reads as follows: “Amy, an 11-year-old girl, joins a group of dancers named “the cuties” at school, and rapidly grows aware of her burgeoning femininity – upsetting her mother and her values in the process.”

… The trailer has already inspired a lot of rage from YouTube critics who are sick of the LGBT agenda to sexualize and exploit innocent children.

“Jeffrey Epstein would have loved this show,” a user with the handle “MR. OBVIOUS” wrote in a comment.

“The premise is a dishonest one. One doesn’t have to be remotely religious to want to forbid their 11-year old daughter from twerking in a scantily clad clothing, but they have to make the main character a victim of a religious upbringing so that opponents of this movie would be seen as religious zealots,” commented user “zhengyingli” about the trailer.

“This looks so disgusting, I felt like I’m already on an Offenders list just watching this,” user “Junior Jr.” wrote in a comment.

“Not even trying to hide the pedo rings anymore,” wrote user “IchiPopp” in a comment.

Michelle and her husband represent the values of the third world, not the values of a Western Christian society.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending