Connect with us

White House

JUST DO IT: There Are Already 31 Active National Emergencies. Here’s A Full List

Published

on

President Donald Trump has no reason to hesitate in declaring a national emergency to build the southern border Wall. The national emergency is real and it’s hitting us hard.

Formally declaring a national emergency is not a big deal, especially if you look at all the foreign-focused situations that prompted President Trump’s predecessors to use the emergency option — including Barack Obama, who declared 13 national emergencies, 11 of which are still active. Did the mainstream media call Obama a dictator for using this strategy?

President Trump has declared three national emergencies himself. Surely the systemic destruction of the United States through open-borders crime and drug proliferation warrants a fourth push on the “emergency” button. If you look at all the dimensions of this issue — the drugs, the human trafficking, the cartel violence, the suspected terrorists routinely apprehended — the Border Crisis merits several national emergencies, at least.

Trending: Deranged Democrat Demands Prosecution of 40,000 Trump Supporters Who Were OUTSIDE Capitol

Here are the 31 national emergencies that are in effect right now. Are these situations making you panic at all times? Are these problems bigger than the existential threat of losing our borders? You decide.

  1. 1979: Blocking Iranian Government Property
take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Our oldest still-running national emergency comes from the Iran hostage crisis. Does the existence of the Ayatollah constitute a national emergency? Yes. Should Barack Obama have sent the Iranians $1.7 billion in cash pallets? No, that should have been another national emergency right there.

2. 1994: Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 

Bill Clinton regulated WMD’s.

3. 1995: Prohibiting Transactions With Terrorists Who Threaten To Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process

This bans any dealing with Hamas and Hezbollah, but again it does not seem like the spirit of this national emergency has been upheld very well by some of our recent leaders. The Obama White House stifled anti-Hezbollah efforts to make it easier to finalize their disastrous Iran deal.

4. 1995: Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources

Some regulations on the oil business.

5. 1995: Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers

Does building a Wall count as “Blocking Assets” for drug dealers?

6. 1996: Regulations of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels With Respect To Cuba

The Cuban Missile Crisis was no laughing matter, and the Communist threat close to our shores has not gone anywhere.

7. 1997: Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan

This national emergency did not prevent Bill Clinton from bombing a Sudanese medicine factory during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which prompted Christopher Hitchens’ greatest ever anti-war headline in The Nation: “Close But No Cigar.”

8. 2001: Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans

How about blocking migration of persons who threaten national stabilization efforts of the United States?

9. 2001: Continuation of Export Control Regulations

Something to do with exports.

10. 2001: Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks

9/11 was a national emergency. How Bush and Cheney responded to 9/11 left us in perpetual national emergency.

11. 2001: Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism

This national emergency is a no-brainer. But it didn’t stop Barack Obama from making transactions with persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism.

12. 2003: Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe

This is not more important to the United States than the security of our own border.

13. 2003: Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq Has An Interest

In 2013, Reuters pegged the total U.S. taxpayer cost of the Iraq War at $1.7 trillion, not including outstanding veteran benefits.

14. 2004: Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods To Syria

Bashar al-Assad has been a longtime target of the national security establishment in Washington, which does not seem to care quite as much about the national security threat on our southern border.

15. 2006: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus

Belarus is a country in Europe.

16. 2006: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Too bad this Bush-era national emergency is not called “Blocking Access of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Texas and Arizona.”

17. 2007: Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or its Democratic Processes and Institutions

Lebanon is a country with borders, much like the United States.

18. 2008: Continuing Certain Restrictions with Respect to North Korea and North Korean Nationals

Nobody ever made any real progress in North Korea until President Trump.

19. 2010: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia

Some pirate-related sanctions on Somalia.

20. 2011: Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related To Libya

Hillary Clinton took out Muammar Gaddafi and now there is an active slave trade in Libya.

21: 2011: Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations

Does this apply to the Clinton Foundation?

22. 2012: Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security or Stability of Yemen

Yemen is not known for its peace, security or stability, and neither is the United States in the age of open-borders mass migration.

23. 2014: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine

Ukraine and the United States of America are different countries located in different parts of the world.

24. 2014: Blocking Property of Certain Persons with Respect to South Sudan

Sudan is a place fraught with emergency, granted, but so is the United States in our borderless present.

25. 2014: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic

Drug cartels are contributing to the conflict in the American Republic.

26. 2015: Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela

The “suspending entry” part is good.

27. 2015: Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities

The criminal cartels in the United States are more tech-savvy than they let on, and pose serious threats to the American people.

28. 2015: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi

Burundi is in Africa.

29. 2017: Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption

President Trump’s first national emergency.

30. 2018: Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States election

President Trump won fair and square, it had nothing to do with the Russians.

31: 2018: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Nicaragua

The situation in Nicaragua is presenting itself at our southern border.

White House

Biden White House Will ‘Start Acting Now’ on Slavery Reparations Without Congressional Approval

Enshrining the new leftist caste system.

Published

on

The Biden White House has announced that they will “start acting now” on reparations for slavery regardless of what goes on in Congress.

“We don’t want to wait on a study. We’re going to start acting now,” Senior White House adviser Cedric Richmond said during a recent interview with Axios.

“We have to start breaking down systemic racism and barriers that have held people of color back and especially African-Americans,” he added.

Richmond believes that House Resolution 40, a measure introduced in the legislature to study reparations, will eventually pass, but he maintains that the administration will move on the issue regardless of what the facts or logic of the matter dictate.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“We have to do stuff now to improve the plight, status, future, and empowerment of Black people all around the country,” Richmond said.

Richmond is building on the case made by White House press secretary Jen Psaki, who has affirmed the Biden administration’s support of the reparations study.

“He certainly would support a study of reparations,” Psaki said. “He understands we don’t need a study to take action right now on systemic racism, so he wants to take actions within his own government in the meantime.”

Biden is already taking measures to give additional handouts to certain minority constituents. He took executive action shortly after being installed as president that compelled the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) “to redress racially discriminatory federal housing policies that have contributed to wealth inequality.”

Richmond confirmed that the Biden administration will be conferring additional government-granted privileges to minorities, particularly when it comes to educational opportunity.

“If you start talking about free college tuition to HBCUs [Historically Black Colleges and Universities] and you start talking about free community college in Title I and all of those things, I think that you are well on your way. Those are doable,” he said.

Big League Politics has reported on Biden’s embrace of Black Lives Matter radicalism as part of his devil’s bargain to seize power:

The terrorist group Black Lives Matter (BLM) uses the same digital fundraising platform, ActBlue, that is used by former vice president Joe Biden and many prominent political figures in the Democrat Party, the National Pulse has discovered.

“We appreciate your support of the movement and our ongoing fight to end state-sanctioned violence, liberate Black people, and end white supremacy forever,” the donation tab on the BLM official website states, which is rerouted to ActBlue.

The donation page notes that “ActBlue Charities is a registered charitable organization formed to democratize charitable giving” and any “contribution is made from my own funds or the funds of an authorizing corporation or other entity, and the funds are not being provided by any other person or entity.”

Biden’s presidential campaign has received a stunning $119,253,857 from the ActBlue platform, which sustains his presidential ambitions as well as the BLM terror movement.

Biden is living up to his mandate to enact an aggressive and corrosive form of identity politics. As the demographic collapse of the historical American nation continues, a new anti-white caste system of sorts will continue to take shape.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending