Home Runs
Kavanaugh Court: SCOTUS Allows North Dakota Voter ID Law
The Supreme Court Tuesday refused to force the state of North Dakota to rescind a law requiring voter identification at the polls in November.
“The Supreme Court today declined to intervene in a challenge to a North Dakota law that requires voters to present identification that includes a current residential street address,” said a New York Magazine report. “Lawyers say that the ruling will prevent thousands of Native American voters (and tens of thousands of North Dakota residents who are not Native Americans) from casting a ballot in the upcoming 2018 election in a state that could play a key role in Democrats’ efforts to retake the U.S. Senate.”
In polarized political times, presenting identification at the polling booth has become a partisan issue. The Democrats, who supposedly hate the idea of foreign meddling in elections, (see: Russia investigation), have been battling to keep polling locations ID free so their illegal alien “constituents” can have a say. Conservatives, on the other hand, would prefer that one proves his or her American citizenship before having a say in American politics.
Trending: GOP Establishment Threatens President Trump with Impeachment Unless He Denies Election Fraud
After a hard fought battle riddled with baseless smears and attempted personal destruction, Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed to he Supreme Court, giving the nation’s highest court a conservative tilt. For the first time, the court has flexed its conservative muscles.
Conveniently for Kavanaugh, one Senator who (very publicly) voted against his confirmation, Democrat Heidi Heitkamp, will likely lose thousands of votes in November due to the Court’s most recent decision. Heitkamp is in the midst of the fight for her life to hold her Senate seat against Republican Rep. Kevin Cramer.
Featured
HUGE: Court Documents Reveal Shot Kenosha Rioter Joseph Rosenbaum Was a Convicted Child Rapist
Convicted pedophile Joseph Rosenbaum was killed in an altercation at the Kenosha riots.
New court documents of the Pima County, Arizona circuit court reveal that Joseph Rosenbaum was convicted of various sex crimes against children in Arizona in 2002.
Rosenbaum was killed in an altercation while rioting in Kenosha, Wisconsin last week. He is seen on camera lunging at 17-year old Kyle Rittenhouse, who eventually shot him, claiming he acted in self defense when Rosenbaum attempted to take the AR-15 rifle he was carrying. Rittenhouse attempted to flee the scene, and was pursued by two other rioters, one armed with a gun. He tripped and fell, and when the other rioters assailed him, he shot them both. Rosenbaum and one other rioter were killed, and a third wounded. Rittenhouse has been charged with first-degree murder in the shootings.
Watch video of the shootings and decide for yourself.
Shortly after Rosenbaum was identified as one of the deceased individuals, it became public knowledge that he was on the Wisconsin sex offender registry, for crimes committed in Arizona.
One of the men killed during #Kenosha rioting last night, Joseph Rosenbaum, was a convicted sex offender. Convicted of sexual conduct with a minor in Arizona in 2002. pic.twitter.com/u8WVmuOuxi
— Richard (@Wildman_AZ) August 27, 2020
The man who may very well have set off the violent altercation is a convicted pedophile, judging from the court documents that were published Wednesday. A presentence report reveals that Rosenbaum committed a range of sex crimes against several boys from the ages of nine to eleven years old, including outright rape.
More documents reveal the legal proceedings against Rosenbaum.
Rosenbaum would be convicted of two of the eleven total charges.
Some leftists had speculated that Rosenbaum was merely a victim of the criminal justice system upon the revelation that he was a convicted sex offender, claiming he had been merely been railroaded for sexual activity with his 17-year old girlfriend as an adult, or something of the like. The new documents disprove such an assertion, demonstrating that Rosenbaum was convicted for some of the most heinous child sex crimes known to society, including the outright rape of children.
Previous criminal records of parties involved in use-of-force incidences aren’t usually admissible in court cases, but Rittenhouse’s argument of self defense appears more credible when his word is placed against the conduct of a convicted pedophile.
-
Around The World4 days agoEx-Soviet Leader Gorbachev: US Capitol Riot “Planned in Advance, And It Is Clear by Whom”
-
Politics1 day agoGOP Establishment Threatens President Trump with Impeachment Unless He Denies Election Fraud
-
Big League National Security1 day agoDNI Ratcliffe: China Interfered in 2020 Election, CIA Suppressed Info
-
Tech4 days agoAmazon Caters to Creeps by Offering ‘Anatomically Correct’ Sex Dolls of Children
-
Deep State4 days agoIs the FBI Preparing to Revoke 1st Amendment Protections for Trump Supporters?
-
Around The World3 days agoNorway Turns Against Dangerous COVID-19 Vaccines, Warns ‘Very Frail’ People Should Not Take the Shots
-
Politics7 hours agoConstituents Already Beginning to Turn on Peter Meijer, Who Admits That Voting to Impeach Trump May Have Ruined His Political Career
-
Tech3 days agoPresident Trump’s Facebook Page is Reactivated
