Connect with us

Tech

Koch-Funded Swamp Creature Robby Soave Covers for Google By Smearing O’Keefe

Nobody is buying what this Reason Magazine editor is selling.

Published

on

Reason Magazine editor and Beltway favorite Robby Soave joined the media blackout regarding revelations that Google is deliberately manipulating their algorithms to prevent President Donald Trump from attaining re-election in 2020.

Soave went on Twitter to throw shade at James O’Keefe, the award-winning Project Veritas founder who broke the story on Google’s corrupt practices yesterday.

Trending: Los Angeles Enacts Full Coronavirus Lockdown for Three Weeks

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

O’Keefe immediately struck back, making the Koch-funded journo pay for his ridiculous smear attempt.

Soave’s response was arguably lamer and more dishonest than his initial tweet criticizing O’Keefe, and he was ratio’d accordingly.

Paul Joseph Watson of Summit News kicked the Koch-bought propagandist while he was down.

Conservative voices who have been banished completely off of social media took to blasting Soave on their Telegram accounts.

“I’ve sent the above Soave tweet to three major donors to Reason who are personal friends of mine. This is going to cost them,” Milo Yiannopoulos wrote.

“‘Caught James O’Keefe’? It’s called ‘undercover journalism’ you total and utter f**king fool!” exclaimed Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes.

While it may be easy to attribute Soave’s asinine remarks to foolishness, there may be a more sinister motive afoot. The Koch Brothers, who order around Soave and his fellow fake news hacks at Reason Magazine, are actively facilitating Big Brother.

The Charles Koch Institute will be sending representatives to the second annual “After Charlottesville Project” in San Francisco, CA on July 17. The event, which is sponsored by Comcast NBCUniversal, the Kresge Foundation and the Soros Fund Charitable Foundation, intends to exploit the tragedy of Charlottesville to push for even more Orwellian censorship.

They will be joined by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and Big Tech giants like Eventbrite, Pinterest, Mozilla, Patreon and Airbnb to devise new ways to choke off the free speech of right-wing dissidents on their platforms.

The Koch Brothers’ network is also working to make sure that Big Tech retains their special federally-granted privileges under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

The tech monopolists are regulated like neutral platforms although they behave like biased, partisan publishers. The Koch network is opposing efforts led by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) to make these special privileges conditional on being unbiased arbiters of content.

“Senator Hawley’s misguided legislation sets the table for stricter government control over free expression online,” Americans for Prosperity Policy Analyst Billy Easley said in a statement.

“Eroding the crucial protections that exist under Section 230 creates a scenario where government has the ability to police your speech and determine what you can or cannot say online,” Easley added.

Soave looks to be another cheerleader for the Orwellian Nightmare on the bankroll of the Koch Brothers, who want all opposition to their globalist profit-driven agenda to be unpersoned and disenfranchised politically.

Free Speech

YOUR NEW MASTER: Twitter’s Head of Conversational Safety, a “Young, Queer Asian-American Businesswoman,” is “Rethinking” the Concept of User Safety

Do you trust someone like her to make Twitter “a safer place”?

Published

on

The media company Protocol, a sister site of Politico, recently published an article about Twitter’s new “head of product for conversational safety,” Christine Su. It claims that Su, a “young, queer Asian-American businesswoman,” is revolutionizing what “user safety” on social media means.

Twitter hired Su around six months ago to be in charge of “what might be the most difficult task on Twitter,” despite having no apparent experience in politics, programming, and media relations. But Twitter seems to like her for her “creative” and “somewhat radical new ideas” about user safety.

“As a queer woman of color who is an Asian American in tech in rural America, that experience is a very intersectional one. I’ve had plenty of experiences moving through spaces where I wanted more safety,” Su said.

Protocol writes that Su’s vision incorporates “transformative and procedural justice.” Transformative justice ostensibly refers to a non-retributive form of repairing harm done to someone and preventing it from happening again; procedural justice to enacting a set of rules that “make harm rarer in the first place.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This all sounds nice and dandy—but beware. So-called transformative and procedural justice will not benefit you, but will crush you. Anything that’s perceived as “harmful” against “women and people from marginalized groups” can and will be used to censor you. Christine Su may reassuringly claim that “the point is not to make the entire world a safe space,” but she’s open about the fact that she will help give the Coalition of the Fringes more control over what people are allowed to do and say on Twitter.

Examples from the article:

  • Creating an audio hangout feature called “Spaces,” which will allow users to determine who is allowed to participate, as well as who can speak and when. (Note that it’s being tested on “women and marginalized groups of people” first.)
  • Potentially doubling down on functions that “encourage people to read content before reposting it.” (Which is exclusively done to censor or limit the reach of conservative and other right-wing content.)
  • Building tools that “create private pathways for apologies, forgiveness and deescalation.” (The finer details are still a work in progress according to Su.)
  • Defining what a “meaningful conversation” is. (Would people like Su think that anything right-wingers say or believe belongs in a “meaningful conversation”? Let’s just say I wouldn’t bet money on it…)

You know full well that a company like Facebook would shortly follow suit. After all, it’s not just Twitter that Su is “revolutionizing,” but the concept of social media itself. Figure out where all this is heading.

Now is as good a time as ever to plug our Parler:

Follow Big League Politics on Parler: @BigLeaguePol

Follow Evan James on Parler: @CatholicEJames

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending