A concerned citizen wrote an impassioned letter to the editor published by the Fresno Bee entitled “Was Kamala Harris Really Dating?” The citizen writes:
“Could someone please explain what their definition of dating is? Mine is two single people go somewhere and eat, have coffee, see a movie, and get to know each other better. Maybe this leads to a married future or not. Maybe the two are exclusive or maybe they are playing the field and dating other single people. Neither one is married to someone else.
Twice now in The Bee, I’ve read articles about Kamala Harris and her history. Twice now in The Bee, I’ve read that she was “dating” Willie Brown, former California politician and in my opinion, player. Since Willie Brown was married, that doesn’t fit my definition of “dating.” Perhaps The Bee is trying to change history and make Ms. Harris into a normal single person at that time, instead of a tawdry, sordid “other woman” interfering with another family.
Obviously, this doesn’t exonerate Willie Brown, but it says a lot about the character and morals of Ms. Harris. Please, Fresno Bee, stop distorting the truth and changing history.”
Great letter concludes
Willie Brown offered his own take on the Kamala Harris relationship in the lower paragraphs of a recent “Willie’s World” column in the San Francisco Chronicle:
“I’ve been peppered with calls from the national media about my “relationship” with Kamala Harris, most of which I have not returned.
Yes, we dated. It was more than 20 years ago. Yes, I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker.
And I certainly helped with her first race for district attorney in San Francisco. I have also helped the careers of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and a host of other politicians.
The difference is that Harris is the only one who, after I helped her, sent word that I would be indicted if I “so much as jaywalked” while she was D.A.
That’s politics for ya.”
Willie Brown’s recollection ends
Starbucks Barista FIRED After Refusing to Wear “Pride” T-Shirt for Religious Reasons, According to Lawsuit
She is a Christian and was apparently told by her manager that she didn’t have to wear it.
A former Starbucks barista is filing an unlawful discrimination lawsuit against the coffee giant, claiming they fired her for refusing to wear a “Pride” t-shirt that violated her Christian religious convictions.
Betsy Fresse started working as a barista in December 2015. After transferring to a Glen Ridge, New Jersey, store in early 2019, managers apparently “assured” her that her Christian faith wouldn’t be an issue.
Then in June 2019, she noticed a box of Pride shirts on a desk and asked if they’d make her wear one. Her store manager said she wouldn’t have to, but two months later she found herself out of a job after being terminated by a district manager.
A notice of separation claims that Fresse was fired for violating Starbucks’ “core values.” It specifically mentions an incident where she said her colleagues “need Jesus” when given the “Pride” shirt.
Starbucks maintains that “no part of our dress code requires partners to wear any approved items that they have not personally selected” and that Fresse’s claims are “without merit,” in a comment to the New York Post.
So Starbucks denies that she was fired for not wearing the shirt, yet their notice of separation appears to claim that they fired her for something she said about Jesus. Not a good look either way.
Fresse is seeking backpay, punitive damages, money to cover the cost of an attorney, and a permanent injunction that prevents Starbucks from “failing to accommodate […] sincerely held religious beliefs.”
Starbucks has long been a major player in the world of Woke Capital. Back in February Big League Politics reported on how the British branch of Starbucks was raising money for a pro-transgender lobbying group:
The U.K. branch of Starbucks is raising money to push for the chemical castration and surgical mutilation of children.
Nathanael Blake at The Federalist reported that the multinational titan is selling special mermaid-shaped cookies to help the pro-transgender lobbying group Mermaids. Curiously, the group’s founder took her underage son to Thailand to undergo a castration procedure.
Blake correctly observed “That Starbucks is supporting this group illustrates how thoroughly radicals have conquered both the LGBT movement and corporate culture.”
He also called attention to how “In a few years the fight has shifted from government recognition of same-sex relationships as legal marriages to mastectomies, sterilization, and castration for children.”
Here’s hoping that Betsy Fresse is successful in her lawsuit.
Big League Wellness3 days ago
Doctors Urge the CDC to Make the Public Aware of Painful Side Effects of Experimental COVID-19 Vaccines
Culture2 days ago
HMM: Michelle Obama was Desperate Not to be Photographed in a Bikini as First Lady
Campaign 20202 days ago
President Donald Trump to Hold “Tremendous” MAGA Rally in Georgia for GOP Senators
Opinion3 days ago
President Trump Must Consider Annihilating the GOP to Reverse Electoral Impropriety
States3 days ago
Republican TRAITOR Who Certified Dubious Vote in Michigan is Top Lawyer for Michigan House Speaker
Politics3 days ago
BREAKING: Pennsylvania Judge BLOCKS Certification of State’s Election Results
Immigration3 days ago
Illegal Alien Thug Freed from Jail by California’s Sanctuary Policies Charged with Double Homicide
Campaign 20203 days ago
California Republicans Flip Third US House Seat from Democrats in 2020