International Women’s Day is coming up on Sunday, Mar. 8, and liberals are bemoaning the fact that there will be no female U.S. President in 2020.
With Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren (D-MA) bowing out of the race over the past week, that leaves Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) as the last woman in the presidential race. With Gabbard receiving roughly 1 percent of support from Democrats, this means that – barring some kind of miracle – there will be no woman in the White House at the end of this year’s election cycle.
Empowered liberal women, of course, are blaming sexism on the fact that their crop of female candidates could not cut it.
“Every time I get introduced as the most powerful woman, I almost cry, because I wish that were not true,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said after Warren dropped out of the presidential race.
“I so wish that we had a woman president of the United States, and we came so close to doing that,” said Pelosi during her weekly news conference. “I do think there’s a certain element of misogyny.”
“I think the electorate has not come to the same level of enlightenment that many other countries around the world have: that a woman as president can be in the best interests of our country,” Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) told Politico.
Feminist activists are even more enraged that America has not chosen a woman to go to the White House, regardless of their respective qualifications.
“What privilege is, is that white men get to be the default, they get to be the regular, they get to be the fallback position. And then everybody else … is the other, is the exception, is the risk,” said Aimee Allison, co-founder of She the People, a group that agitates for racial and gender quotas in politics.
Another feminist activist simply blamed the American people for being too evil and sexist for the Democrats to be able to put up a female contender.
“The Democratic electorate has never stopped second-guessing ourselves about how we could have averted the disastrous Donald Trump presidency,” said Heather McGee, a distinguished senior fellow at Demos Action who endorsed Warren for President.
“So, yes, misogyny has played a role in 2020 — not because Democratic voters were too misogynistic to vote for a woman, but because we are too aware that the rest of the country appears to be fine with misogyny, from Trump to Brett Kavanaugh to bans on abortion,” she added.
Another bitter feminist just made up complete nonsense to justify her grief and angst that the female contenders could not cut the mustard.
“If Bernie Sanders were a woman, ‘she,’ as an angry, rumpled candidate, never would have made it beyond Mayor Sanders, and even that would have been a stretch. Likewise, if Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren or Amy Klobuchar were men, I have no doubt that one of them would be our nominee against Donald Trump,” said Democratic media consultant Jennifer Burton.
These “empowered” woman seem unwilling to admit that the three major candidates remaining – former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and President Donald Trump – may have just outcompeted their female counterparts based on merit.
Trump Campaign Autopsy Shows Decline in Support From White Men, Coronavirus Epidemic Cost President Re-Election
The 2016 coalition didn’t hold this election.
A post-election autopsy reveals that Donald Trump lost the 2020 presidential election by losing support from White men and Americans who disapproved of his handling and communication regarding the coronavirus epidemic.
Data suggesting as such was obtained by Trump campaign pollster Tony Fabrizio.
“Racially, POTUS suffered his greatest erosion with White voters, particularly White Men in both state groups,” Fabrizio revealed in his findings. Fabrizio referred to swing states that Trump had held from 2016 and those he had lost. The pollster queried voters in ten different states.
Trump also suffered a decline in support from the youngest Americans and those older than 65. There’s strong reason to believe that some assertions within the Republican Party that the coronavirus pandemic was “no biggie” played a crucial in eroding President Trump’s support among seniors, a vital constituency that has traditionally been strongly Republican. Fabrizio’s data indicates that the coronavirus pandemic was by far and away the most important campaign issue in the 2020 election, and that its importance among the electorate played decisively in Joe Biden’s favor.
President Trump’s support among White Men declined by as much as 12% in swing states that he lost in 2020. Joe Biden also improved his vote share among the demographic, which still voted strongly Republican, although in a diminished fashion.
It’s been said that Joe Biden won the election with a Democratic version of the so-called “Sailer Strategy,” discarding the Obama coalition in favor of making direct appeals to white seniors who traditionally vote Republican.
At the direction of Jared Kushner, the Trump 2020 campaign prioritized minority outreach and the so-called ‘Platinum Plan’ in hopes of expanding the President’s base of support. This appears to have been only partially successful, and may have come at the crucial cost of outreach energy and resources targeting middle-class white voters who won Trump the presidency.
Wow! Who saw that coming, besides EVERYONE?
"The autopsy says that Trump saw the 'greatest erosion with white voters, particularly white men.'” https://t.co/y7c4vGmrWt
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) February 2, 2021
President Trump expanded his support from Hispanic Americans, a vital constituency in states such as Texas, Nevada and Florida. However, the midwestern Rust Belt has smaller Hispanic communities, and Trump ultimately lost Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan. Hispanic outreach in Arizona, a state Trump lost by 10,000 votes, didn’t prove as successful as it was in other Sun Belt states, especially with the state’s White senior population inching to the left, relative to 2016. Buffed Hispanic support didn’t prove enough to ultimately swing Nevada, although the President secured a comfortably high margin of victory in Florida.
Trump’s buffed appeal with Hispanics wasn’t matched with Black voters, who largely voted in a fashion comparable to the 2016 election.
A future Republican candidate- even Trump himself, should he choose to run- would have to look more closely at the path to victory staked out in Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign if they seek a strategy with a proven record of success. It’s entirely plausible to believe that future nationalist, populist and conservative presidential candidates can receive even greater levels of Hispanic support while regaining the white blue-collar populist demographic that swept President Trump into the White House in 2016.
Unfortunately, Fabrizio’s autopsy is likely to be wholly ignored, with a sizable contingent of conservatives blaming Trump’s loss exclusively on a set of election steal theories from “brand” online lifestyle influencers. With a persistent fixation on empty dopamine hits, it may prove that Republicans will never a national election ever again, powerless as the Left and corporations transform the United States into a left-liberal oligarchy.
Congress1 day ago
An America First Patriot is Challenging Dan Crenshaw in Next Year’s GOP Primary. Here’s Why.
Big League Guns3 days ago
Second Amendment Patriots Stop Mass Shooting, Take Out Gunman at Louisiana Gun Range
Two Americas2 days ago
Black Teen Travels to White Suburb to Commit Mass Shooting, Mainstream Media Remains Silent
Crime3 days ago
BIZARRE: Biden Recounts Being Arrested After Trespassing in Senate Chamber in Old Video
Opinion2 days ago
Opinion: CPAC’s Incompetency and Hypocrisy on Full Display in Their Handling of the Young Pharaoh Situation
Big League Economics3 days ago
Gas Prices Have Exploded Since Biden Entered Office
Congress2 days ago
RINO ALERT? David Perdue Sat on Millions in Campaign Cash as Democrats Took Georgia Senate Seats
Campaign 20242 days ago
Donald Trump Will Reportedly Claim He’s the “Presumptive 2024 Nominee” in CPAC Speech