Is the Libertarian Party endorsing non-stop mass migration?
In a tweet during the 2020 Democrat debates last Thursday, the Libertarian Party twitter account posted the following:
‘What do you say to white Americans that are uncomfortable with the idea of becoming a racial minority?’ There’s only one answer: You don’t get to use the government to determine the racial makeup of the nation. #DemDebate #DemocraticDebate
This came in response to a question that presidential candidate and Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar was asked regarding the impact of mass migration. One of the members of the debate panel, Yamiche Alcindor, asked Klobuchar, “What do you say to white Americans who are uncomfortable with the idea of becoming a racial minority, even if you don’t share their concerns?”
Klobuchar responded, “I say this is America. You’re looking at it. And we are not going to succeed in the world if we do not invite everyone to be part of our economy.”
The Libertarian Party is clearly following in the footsteps of the political establishment by advancing multiculturalist narratives and policies.
Ironically, the ongoing demographic shift is a problem the government ultimately created with the passage of the 1965 Immigration Act which has attracted predominantly low-skilled migrants from non-Western countries. Such legislation did not happen in a vacuum, since this took place during the Civil Rights era, which witnessed various forms of legislative overreach at the federal level.
A more rational immigration system would take into account migrant’s skills and cultural compatibility. Most importantly, there has to be reductions, if not full-blown pauses, to assimilate migration waves. If not, the U.S. is leaving itself susceptible to potential demographic imbalances and internal conflict if it continues its unfettered migration policy.
Sooner or later, America will need to consider a more rational approach to immigration policy.
Starbucks Barista FIRED After Refusing to Wear “Pride” T-Shirt for Religious Reasons, According to Lawsuit
She is a Christian and was apparently told by her manager that she didn’t have to wear it.
A former Starbucks barista is filing an unlawful discrimination lawsuit against the coffee giant, claiming they fired her for refusing to wear a “Pride” t-shirt that violated her Christian religious convictions.
Betsy Fresse started working as a barista in December 2015. After transferring to a Glen Ridge, New Jersey, store in early 2019, managers apparently “assured” her that her Christian faith wouldn’t be an issue.
Then in June 2019, she noticed a box of Pride shirts on a desk and asked if they’d make her wear one. Her store manager said she wouldn’t have to, but two months later she found herself out of a job after being terminated by a district manager.
A notice of separation claims that Fresse was fired for violating Starbucks’ “core values.” It specifically mentions an incident where she said her colleagues “need Jesus” when given the “Pride” shirt.
Starbucks maintains that “no part of our dress code requires partners to wear any approved items that they have not personally selected” and that Fresse’s claims are “without merit,” in a comment to the New York Post.
So Starbucks denies that she was fired for not wearing the shirt, yet their notice of separation appears to claim that they fired her for something she said about Jesus. Not a good look either way.
Fresse is seeking backpay, punitive damages, money to cover the cost of an attorney, and a permanent injunction that prevents Starbucks from “failing to accommodate […] sincerely held religious beliefs.”
Starbucks has long been a major player in the world of Woke Capital. Back in February Big League Politics reported on how the British branch of Starbucks was raising money for a pro-transgender lobbying group:
The U.K. branch of Starbucks is raising money to push for the chemical castration and surgical mutilation of children.
Nathanael Blake at The Federalist reported that the multinational titan is selling special mermaid-shaped cookies to help the pro-transgender lobbying group Mermaids. Curiously, the group’s founder took her underage son to Thailand to undergo a castration procedure.
Blake correctly observed “That Starbucks is supporting this group illustrates how thoroughly radicals have conquered both the LGBT movement and corporate culture.”
He also called attention to how “In a few years the fight has shifted from government recognition of same-sex relationships as legal marriages to mastectomies, sterilization, and castration for children.”
Here’s hoping that Betsy Fresse is successful in her lawsuit.
Culture4 days ago
HMM: Michelle Obama was Desperate Not to be Photographed in a Bikini as First Lady
Campaign 20204 days ago
President Donald Trump to Hold “Tremendous” MAGA Rally in Georgia for GOP Senators
Congress2 days ago
‘Let Them Be Free!’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Urges Trump to Pardon Edward Snowden and Julian Assange for Exposing ‘the Crimes of Barack Obama and the Deep State’
Big League Wellness3 days ago
New Study Shows 84 Percent Decrease in Hospitalization Rates for COVID-19 Patients Treated with Hydroxychloroquine
Campaign 20204 days ago
California Republicans Flip Third US House Seat from Democrats in 2020
States3 days ago
Illicit $25 Million Dominion Deal Set Up in Michigan by Former Democrat ‘Voter Protection’ Czar is Listed as Evidence in Kraken Lawsuit
Politics3 days ago
MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: James Mattis Bashes ‘America First’ as He Takes $$$ From Pro-China Lobbyists
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Los Angeles Enacts Full Coronavirus Lockdown for Three Weeks