Just when you thought the Democrats couldn’t get worse, former President Barack Hussein Obama organized a meeting with notorious Jew hating Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib on Thursday, March 28, 2019.
In an Instagram post on Tlaib’s profile, she posted a picture of Obama embracing her with the caption, “President Obama met with us new members of Congress and it was a thoughtful discussion. The best part was when he looked straight at me and said, “I’m proud of you.””
It is unknown what Obama is exactly “proud of”.
Is he proud of the fact that Tlaib has ties to known proHezbollah and Hamas activists? Is he proud of her calls for genocide against the Jews? Is he proud of the fact that she has called for the eradication of Israel? Is he proud that she disrespected President Trump and called him a “motherfucker”? Is he proud that she is friends with Linda Sarsour who called for jihad against Trump? Is he proud of her ties to CAIR, which happens to be a designated Islamic terrorist organization? Is he proud that she physically assaulted a Jewish journalist? Or is he super proud that she is a member of a Holocaust denier Facebook page which refers to Jews as rodents and blames zionists for 9/11?
Must be all of the above, because all of the above are true. Which is why Tlaib has been dubbed as a member of the “Hamas Caucus”.
Maybe now that Barack Hussein Obama is out of office and his beloved jihadist colleagues are now serving in Congress he will finally publicly admit that he is in fact a Muslim sympathizer who abused his position as President of the United States to help advance the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood in America.
Since Rashida Tlaib thinks it’s acceptable to refer to President Trump as a “Motherfucker”, then I think it’s fair to say that Barack Hussein Obama is truly a Jew-hating, jihadist enabling bastard.
WATCH: LAURA LOOMER #LOOMERS RASHIDA TLAIB ABOUT TERROR TIES AND JEW HATRED:
Read more about Rashida Tlaib here:
Laura Loomer is a conservative investigative journalist and activist. Originally from Arizona, Laura began her career working as an undercover journalist for Project Veritas from 2015-2017. She covers politics, anti-Semitism, immigration, terrorism, the Islamification of the West, and voter fraud. Loomer’s investigations have been broadcasted on every major national mainstream media outlet in the United States, as well as many international publications.
Support Laura Loomer’s Independent Journalism here:
Follow Laura Loomer on Instagram
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Did Bernie Sanders Just Endorse a Neocon Regime Change Foreign Policy?
Is Bernie Sanders the anti-war candidate that many non-interventionists are making him out to be?
Journalists Jacob Crosse and Barry Grey presented some interesting observations about Sanders’ foreign policy views.
Sanders criticized the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani in January and also stressed his opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
During the Iowa presidential debate, Sanders loudly boasted, “I not only voted against that war, I helped lead the effort against that war.”
However, Sanders changed his tune when chatting with the New York Times.
The answers the Sanders campaign gave the Times showed its flexibility when it comes to foreign policy.
In other words, the Sanders campaign signaled to the military and intelligence apparatus that Sanders won’t present a threat to their interests and may actually carry out their interventionist agenda.
One question in the survey that the Times sent the Sanders campaign stuck out above the rest.
The third survey question asked, “Would you consider military force to pre-empt an Iranian or North Korean nuclear or missile test?”
The Sanders campaign responded, “Yes.”
Based on this response, Sanders’ is signaling that he’s willing to continue Bush-era policies of “preemptive war.”
Like Obama, Sanders’ opposition to the Iraq War was a matter of politics rather than a principled opposition to regime change wars.
His campaign was also asked, “Would you consider military force for a humanitarian intervention?”
Sanders responded, “Yes.”
Some of the wars that the U.S. carried out in the name of “human rights” have been the Bosnian war and the bombing of Serbia in the 1990s along with the aerial campaign against Libya in 2011 and the Civil War launched in Syria.
All in all, Sanders’ pro-peace/non-interventionist image is at best window dressing.
Under a Sanders presidency, the interventionist status quo will likely stay in place.
News4 days ago
Bernie Sanders 2020 ‘Win’ in NH Netted a LOSS OF 80,000 VOTES from 2016
News4 days ago
Virginia State Police are Silent About Door-to-Door Enforcement of Suppressor Ban
Violent Left3 days ago
New Mexico Bureaucrat Arrested for Vandalizing State GOP Headquarters
Violent Left4 days ago
New Hampshire Thug Arrested After Assaulting ‘MAGA’ Hat-Wearing 15-Year Old at Polling Site
News3 days ago
MS-13 Thug Gets Life Sentence in Virginia for Rape and Abduction
Tech3 days ago
More Censorship: Controversial Right-Wing YouTuber Nick Fuentes is Booted From Platform, Even Ben Shapiro Says It’s Too Far
Deep State3 days ago
Bill Barr Pushes Back Against Trump, Criticizes President’s Comments on Stone, Drops Case Against McCabe
Culture3 days ago
How Vulture Capitalists Use Their Ill-Gotten Gains to Push Transgenderism Onto Children
Violent Left4 days ago
Wife of ‘Proud Boys’ Member Imprisoned for Self-Defense Pleads for Help for Their Three Children
The Swamp2 days ago
SWAMP: FBI Press Officer Accepted Baseball Tickets From CNN Reporter
News4 days ago
GUILTY: Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti Convicted in Extortion Trial
Politics4 days ago
MIT Warns That Voting App Used in Several States is Vulnerable for Hackers to ‘Alter, Stop or Expose’ Votes