Medical Experts Urge for COVID-19 Vaccine to be Delayed for the Elderly Because They’re ‘Too White’

Medical experts are showing how medicine will be distributed under the technocracy by urging to delay the COVID-19 vaccine for the elderly, potentially killing scores of them or needlessly extending their suffering, because they are “too white.”

The experts spoke out in a New York Times article about how the COVID-19 vaccine, which has been rushed into mass production by Big Pharma with government relaxing restrictions, should be withheld from the elderly.

“Older populations are whiter,” said Dr. Schmidt, who is an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania, in the Times article. “Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving them additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”

Additionally, Marc Lipsitch, who works as an infectious-disease epidemiologist at Harvard, is arguing that teachers are not “essential workers” and should also have the vaccine delivery delayed to them.

Left-wing economist Elise Gould offered additional analysis claiming that racial grievance theories should determine how medicine is dispensed during a pandemic.

“When you talk about disproportionate impact and you’re concerned about people getting back into the labor force, many are mothers, and they will have a harder time if their children don’t have a reliable place to go,” she said. “And if you think generally about people who have jobs where they can’t telework, they are disproportionately black and brown. They’ll have more of a challenge when child care is an issue.”

Despite their best efforts, these medical experts may actually be doing a favor for elderly white folks considering the horrific side-effects that have occurred during clinical trials where the experimental COVID-19 vaccine has been administered.

Big League Politics has reported about how Big Pharma whistleblowers are being sued by COVID-19 vaccine makers in an attempt to suppress the truth about potential negative side-effects from the shots:

Big Pharma is hitting back against a whistleblower who has valiantly come forward to detail the horrific side effects that he experienced from COVID-19 vaccines.

The Serum Institute of India (SII) is suing a 40-year-old Indian businessman who had participated in a clinical trial for a COVID-19 vaccine. He went public with his account of suffering a “neurological and psychological” breakdown after being stuck with the dangerous shots.

“He spent 15 days in hospital, including 8 days in intensive care, suffering from acute neuro-encephalopathy (an altered mental state) that left him “totally disoriented,” so much so that he could no longer recognize close relatives,” his wife said to reporters, per Science Magazine.

He is suing SII for $676,000 in damages and demanding that these clinical trials are immediately shuttered. SII is suing the man in retaliation, alleging that he has engaged in “malicious” defamation against the massive corporation. They claim he was “specifically informed by the medical team that the complications he suffered were independent of the vaccine trial he underwent.” They are seeking $13.5 million in damages from the whistleblower.

“The COVISHIELD vaccine is safe and immunogenic. The incident with the Chennai volunteer though highly unfortunate was in no way induced by the vaccine and Serum Institute of India is sympathetic with the volunteer’s medical condition,” the SII said.

However, the whistleblower’s wife is claiming that her husband is still experiencing the negative impacts of Big Pharma’s shots.

“Even after two weeks, simple things like online payments… he asks me to do. He never does that. He got a good project during the pandemic; it was an American project that started on October 1. Apparently he has lost that. Because of his condition the clients have moved back. They wanted their work to be done quickly,” she said.

In the upcoming new world order, medicine may be withheld from an individual if they are not of a certain preferred race.

Our Latest Articles